Practical assessment on the run – ipads as an effective mobile and paperless tool in physical education and teaching

This paper investigates the use of iPads in the assessment of predominantly second year Bachelor of Education Primary /Early Childhood pre-service teachers undertaking a physical education and health unit. Within this unit practical assessment tasks are graded by tutors in a variety of indoor and outdoor settings. The main barriers for the lecturer or tutor for effective assessment in these contexts includes limited time to assess and the provision of explicit feedback for large numbers of students, complex assessment procedures, overwhelming record-keeping and assessing students without distracting from the performance being presented (Gallo et al. 2013). The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate whether incorporating mobile technologies such as iPads to access online rubrics within the Blackboard environment would enhance and simplify the assessment process. Results from the findings indicate that using iPads to access online rubrics was successful in streamlining the assessment process because it provided pre-service teachers with immediate and explicit feedback. In addition, tutors experienced a reduction in the amount of time required for the same workload by allowing quicker forms of feedback via the iPad dictation function. These outcomes have future implications and potential for mobile paperless assessment in other disciplines such as health, environmental science, and engineering.


Introduction
There is growing interest in the potential to extend the use of mobile technology in pre-service teacher education.Research indicates that replacing traditional and time-consuming method of written assessment and provision of feedback can significantly enhance the assessment process (Barnett et al. 2002;Bennett, 2002;Buzzetto-More & Alade, 2006;Byers 2001;Vendlinski & Stevens, 2002).Gallo et al. (2013) argue that teaching large numbers of students, time restrictions, complex assessment procedures and associated record keeping are the main barriers for effective assessment in physical education.However, little research currently supports the use of digital technology to improve the time-consuming written process of assessing practical performance tasks of pre-service teachers particularly in physical education.This pilot study aimed to evaluate the potential of a mobile paperless assessment method using iPads and the effectiveness of online rubrics.Mobile devices such as iPads can be easily used in the assessment of physical education performance tasks that can link to the university Blackboard site where student grades are stored.The following questions framed the focus of the study: 1) To investigate whether the use of iPads with a dictation function in combination with online rubrics would improve the time-consuming written process of assessing preservice teachers undertaking physical performance tasks by tutors?
2) To investigate the relationship between the use of online rubrics and pre-service teacher's perceptions about assessment requirements and expectations and methods of receiving feedback?
To provide a context for the study, the next section examines the literature relating to various aspects of assessment in pre-service teacher education especially the use of mobile technology and rubrics.The studies mentioned in this review have relevance to the current study as they predominantly examine rubric-based assessment in practical performance tasks.

Literature review
The majority of research relating to the use of mobile technology, such as iPads, for supporting learning has been directed towards primary and secondary education (Chen et al. 2003;Rogers et al. 2005;Sharple et al. 2002).Several studies have focused on technology use in teacher education (Blackwell et al. 2013;Herro et al. 2013) and addressed issues regarding the use of mobile devices in learning and teaching and how the specific functionalities of these devices can be employed to support learning and assessment.However, there remains a paucity of research investigating the potential of using these devices specifically for practical assessment tasks such as those undertaken in physical education despite the fact that mobility is the distinctive feature of devices such as iPads.
Traditional paper and pencil methods to record the assessment of the practical performances of physical education students has proven cumbersome and time-consuming.Byers (2001) confirms that interactive assessment such as technology-based data collection and analysis would promote dynamic feedback and enhance assessment 'on the fly ' (p. 362).Research by McFarlane (2013) and Melhuish and Fallon (2010) confirms that the greatest affordance of an iPad for teaching and learning is its portability and its potential for real-time experiential learning.
Therefore, the inclusion of mobile devices such as iPads as an easily accessible, mobile, paperless tool in practical assessment tasks could offer a potential solution.Patten et al. (2006) identified seven functions by which a mobile device would serve educational requirements: administration, referential, interactive, micro world, data collection, location aware, and collaborative.The framework by Patten et al. (2006) demonstrates that a variety of learning and potential assessment activities can be carried out using mobile devices.This functional framework of mobile device use and technology integration is used to evaluate the range of assessment activities carried out in this study alongside the evaluation of the benefits of using iPads in the assessment of practical tasks.These devices have the capacity to provide assessors with a tool that could conveniently record grades and deliver written, audio or video feedback by tutors using the dictation functionality of the iPad.
Several researchers have recognised that the use of different instructional, sport and physical education-related technologies and e-learning strategies would enhance the teaching of physical education (Kretschmann 2010;Macdonald & Hay 2010;Mohnsen 2008;Roblyer & Doering 2010).However, most studies about technology integration within physical education literature have focused on competency in device use (Kretschmann 2010;Mohnsen 2008;NASPE 2009;Russell 2007;Strand & Bender 2011;Woods et al. 2008).These devices have included: monitoring systems such as digital video and cameras, heart rate monitors; active gaming devices; handheld devices such as mobile phones, video game consoles and sports-related software to demonstrate game play, tactics and provide motivation in teaching sports and physical education.Little research thus far has been conducted to indicate how the use of technology could improve the time-consuming written process of assessing students undertaking physical performance tasks.
The need to improve the practice of assessment generally in higher education has been well documented (Boud, 2000;Maxwell, 2010).Further research confirms the effect that assessment, including technology-based assessment, has on supporting and extending student learning (Earl, 2003;Kirkwood & Price, 2008;Rust, 2002).An extensive review of literature relating to the use of assessment rubrics in higher education by Reddy and Andrade (2010) identifies the link between rubric use, increased student achievement and improved academic performance.The review highlights research by Powell (2001), Reitmeier et al. (2004), Andrade and Du (2005), and Schneider (2006) that examined student and instructor perceptions about rubric use.The findings from these studies conclude that students generally respond positively to rubric use.
Conversely, two other studies (Bolton 2006;Parkes 2010) indicated a noted resistance by university instructors to incorporate rubrics as an assessment tool.One possible reason for this view, as noted by Hafner and Hafner (2003), is that rubric development requires a significant amount of time and effort on the part of the tutor or instructor.Conflicting results about the effectiveness of rubrics on student performance in studies by Petkov and Petkova (2006), Reitmeier et al. (2004) and Green and Bowser (2006) also confirm the importance of clarity and appropriateness of language in the development of effective assessment rubrics.In addition, Reddy and Andrade (2010) conclude that: Important aspects of validity have not yet been addressed at all, including the need to establish the alignment between the criteria on the rubric and the content or subject being assessed (content validity); the facets of the intended construct being evaluated (construct validity); and the appropriateness of generalisations to other, related activities (criterion validity) (p.445).
While validity and reliability of the rubrics used are not the focus of this study, this comment highlights a need for more research in the area of effective online assessment rubric development particularly in the assessment of physical education.Several researchers (Andrade & Du 2005;Bolton 2006;Maxwell 2010;Parkes 2010;Shaw 2014) identified the key tenets for effective assessment rubric use in higher education and in particular performance assessment as being to: 1) clarify the assessment task; 2) enable regulation of planning of assignments; 3) produce work of better quality; 3) increase student confidence in undertaking the assessment task; 4) provide clear descriptions at each level of performance; 5) provide explicit learning outcomes and 6) make grading fair and transparent.Other research highlights the effectiveness and efficiency of utilising computer-assisted grading rubrics compared to other grading methods (Ahoniemi & Karavirta 2009;Anglin & Campbell 2005;Gardner Sheridan and Andreas 2013;Heinrich et al. 2009).Further studies (Brown 2004(Brown -2005;;Orell 2006;Stefani 2004-05) emphasise the necessity to include useful, effective and timely feedback and assert that using rubrics is a vital aspect of teaching and assessing and should be included in current teaching practice.In addition, research (Ally et al. 2014;Rosenthal & Eliason 2015) highlights the need for lecturers in higher education to model best pedagogy and practice of ICT (Information Communication Technology) integration to enable pre-service teachers to develop knowledge and skills that will transfer into their teaching setting.Shaw (2014) confirms this view and suggests that when faculty staff employ rubrics to document student learning, it provides an opportunity to model pedagogical practice.All of the factors mentioned not only have implications for modifications to the rubrics developed for this study but for future rubric awareness and development in teacher education more generally.

Methodology
The methodology underpinning this study is action research.Action research is a flexible spiral process to promote change and improve practice (Cole & Knowles 2000;Cousin 2009;Hanson & Nalder-Godfrey 2004;Johnson 1993;Kemmis & McTaggart 2005;Sagor 2000;Souto-Manning 2012, Tinning 1992).It consists of a cyclical process based on four phases: 1) problem identification; 2) taking initial action; 3) data collection and analysis and 4) reflection and data driven action before beginning the spiral again.It is the intention of this study to reflect on and disseminate results to improve and update current practices in assessment particularly in units such as physical education where practical tasks are prevalent.In order to gain a richer understanding about the aim and purpose of this study, the next section describes the research site and context.

Project overview
This pilot study was part of a year-long university Learning and Teaching grant that investigated the use of iPads in the assessment of a mixed group of second, third and fourth year pre-service teachers undertaking a Personal Development, Health and Physical Education unit (PDHPE) within the Bachelor of Education Primary/Early Childhood program.This study took place at three campuses of a regional Australian university.The university has a long history of distance education, maintains a strong ICT focus and has a centrally supported eLearning management system called Blackboard.This system, widely used throughout the Australian and international higher education community, is an easy to use browser-based content Learning Management System (LMS) enabling students online collaboration as well as access to study materials and resources.The majority of study units have an associated Blackboard site and the School of Education uses these sites to present unit materials and provide students with feedback and grades.
Two practical tasks, a Health 'Show and Tell' presentation in a classroom and a Physical Education micro teaching assessment task were used to trial the use of iPads in the unit assessment.Practical tasks in this study were assessed by five tutors across the three campuses and took place in either a classroom, a gymnasium or on an oval creating a number of practical challenges for the provision of student feedback.The main barrier to assessment in this context and in these types of locations is to assess the pre-service teacher's performance in time-efficient manner.Therefore this project aims to investigate the relationship between the use of iPads and online rubrics as part of the assessment process.

Participants
The study focused on the practical assessment of 250 pre-service teachers undertaking a PDHPE unit.Out of the pre-service teacher cohort: 58% were 2 nd year students, 15% 3 rd year and 12% were 4 th year students.The age range of the participants was between 18 and 54 years, with 72% female and 28% male.A random sample of the pre-service teachers was given a survey to complete anonymously details about the survey follows and is also attached in Appendix 1. Five tutors, who had at least five years tutoring experience and whose average age was 44.6 years, were also involved in the study across the three SCU campuses and all were briefed about the purpose of the pilot and provided with an Apple iPad (4 th generation) with Wi-Fi capability, earphones and microphone.All tutors were relatively confident in the use of technology but not so familiar with iPads and how to connect to the internal Blackboard system.All tutors were therefore provided with introductory training on how to use the iPads and the internal Blackboard system rubric tool.The individual rubric was devised offline and then built on the Blackboard shell using the rubric tool.

Data collection and analysis
To investigate the potential of using iPads in practical physical education and health assessment tasks, the study was conducted in four phases: Phase 1 -Problem identification; Phase 2 -Pilot iPad trial; Phase 3 -Survey and semi-structured interviews; and Phase 4 -Reflection and discussion of results.
In Phase one, the problem identification stage of this action research study, a consultative meeting was organised with the Digital Learning and Teaching team to discuss the rubric tool located on the university's Blackboard site and its suitability for mobile assessment.It was deemed that the online rubric could be translated into a digital format and made available for pre-service teachers on the university Blackboard site.As a result, an online rubric was developed for each of the two targeted assessment tasks: a Physical Education micro-teach and a Health 'Show and Tell' presentation.In addition, pre-service teachers were provided with a copy of the rubric at the beginning of the unit, which included performance level descriptors to guide their assessment preparation.A copy of the micro-teach rubric is attached as an example in Appendix 2. Tutors marking the practical assessment task ticked the appropriate rubric criteria boxes online using the iPad and provided additional feedback in the comments box by using the dictation function and microphone.The basic features of rubric marking online enabled the tutor to: mark electronically; select the appropriate level descriptors associated with each criteria relevant to each pre-service teacher's level of achievement; and provide electronic feedback either typed or dictated.The online rubric functionality then automatically calculated the marks allocated by the tutor and sent them to each individual pre-service teacher's grade repository (gradebook).As well as having access to both grade and online feedback, pre-service teachers also received brief verbal feedback immediately after their assessment.
During the trial phase the tutors received instructions and training on how to use the iPad and the rubrics on Blackboard.A hard copy (paper) version of the rubric was also printed off in the initial trial to ensure that if the technology failed or was not deemed the preferred method by the tutor they had a record of each individuals attempt at the task.Pre-service teachers were all given a copy of the rubric well before the practical assessment task during tutorials on campus.
In the initial stages of the project the authors trialed the applications and Apps such as Garageband were explored to compare and determine how to provide appropriate audio feedback on the iPad.
Phase two consisted of a trial to use the iPads and online rubrics to assess the practical delivery of a Physical Education micro teaching episode and a Health 'Show and Tell' presentation by 250 pre-service teachers.The 'Show and Tell' presentations consisted of each pre-service teacher presenting a health strategy to their peer group.This was scheduled across weeks 3-11 of the semester and took place in a tutorial classroom.In the physical education micro teaching task, students were required to teach a skill utilising a Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) approach to a group of peers.Their performance was assessed individually either at campus specific gymnasiums or on an oval depending on the skill/game being taught.Internet access was tested in each location prior to use to ensure that the iPads could be used in the process of assessment of both tasks.After the first week of assessment, all tutors consulted with each other to moderate the grades being allocated to students and to determine any issues found when using the iPad.
Phase three consisted of a survey given to pre-service teachers to determine their perceptions about the use of online rubrics and quality of feedback provided after their practical assessment tasks.The survey consisted of five questions related to access to the marking rubric prior assessment; clarification of expectations, rubric and comment feedback; comparison with receiving only a final grade and overall feedback experience.The pre-service teachers completed the survey anonymously at the end of the assessment period after they had received their results and feedback.
In addition, semi-structured interviews regarding the use of iPads were conducted with the five tutors.The following interview questions guided discussion: 1) What are the benefits and challenges in using iPads as an assessment tool?
2) What impact did the rubrics available for online marking have on the assessment process when evaluating practical assessment tasks for both pre-service teachers and tutors?
Responses to the study research questions are discussed in the following section.

Results and discussion
Phase four, which involves reflection and data driven analysis, outlines the results of the pilot study in terms of the (1) range of activities that the iPads were able to support in the assessment process (2) benefits; and (3) challenges and issues encountered in the use of both iPads and online rubrics.To analyse the data a framework was employed that had been utilised by Fabian and McLean (2014) to identify and assess the benefits and pitfalls when using mobile devices in learning and teaching activities.This framework, originally developed by Patten et al. (2006), analysed handheld applications in relation to their application function and pedagogical underpinning.In this study, the framework by Patten et al. (2006) was used to map the categories of application and highlight the useful functions undertaken and possible pedagogical implications in the process of assessment using iPads as shown in Table 1.Based on this framework, it is evident that the predominant purpose in the use of iPads for assessment was administrative which included its interactivity and data collection function.
However, as the data suggests the formulation of explicit rubrics on Blackboard also allowed tutors to evaluate pre-service teachers' performance on site and facilitated learning and engagement in the task criteria prior the assessment period.In addition, the dictation function and mobile availability of the iPad offered tutors a time-efficient method of providing feedback than the original paper based feedback for the task.There were however, limitations in the use of iPads and these will be clarified in subsequent sections.

Benefits
Analysis of data from the student survey and semi-structured interviews with tutors revealed that the use of iPads and online rubrics significantly improved the efficiency and quality of assessment procedures in the health and physical education unit assessment tasks.Based on the findings the most outstanding benefit for pre-service teachers was the immediacy and quality of feedback.The original thought was that they would receive their performance feedback immediately.However, a short time delay between the feedback process and release of the feedback results for each assessment was deemed necessary to undertake a process of moderation across three campuses.The delay in feedback release was to ensure that all grades awarded were consistent.Overall pre-service teachers were satisfied with this explanation and were still impressed by the quick return of results and feedback.In addition, at the end of their micro-teaching assessment, a few minutes was spent with each pre-service teacher to personally provide immediate feedback and discuss their performance.This allowed the students and the tutor to come to a common understanding and consensus about the strengths and weaknesses of the performance before the final online grade and comment was released.Therefore, the provision of multi-faceted mode of assessment feedback in this pilot study afforded pre-service teachers the opportunity to reflect on the quality of their work and areas for improvement.This aligns with research by Lombardi (2008, p. 4) who confirms that 'learners want to know the criteria by which they will be judged, but they also want processes in place to help them improve and develop, guided by clear, practical, and specific feedback'.
The first question in the survey was to ascertain how many pre-service teachers actually accessed the rubric before their practical assessment.An analytic rubric was provided for each assessment task and was explained in detail to them at the beginning of the unit.A video recording was also made about the expectations and requirements of each task to increase preservice teacher understanding.Of the 58 responses, only one pre-service teacher did not access the rubric.The second question sought to find out the 'extent to which the rubric clarified the assessment requirement?'The majority of pre-service teachers found that the rubric helped to The final question required pre-service teachers to comment on their experience regarding the method and timeliness of their assessment feedback.Most of them expressed a preference for the use of rubrics as the feedback guided their future learning (Reddy & Andrade, 2009).In addition, the timeliness of results and quality of feedback was appreciated and gave meaning and understanding to the assessor's grading of the assessment tasks.These pre-service teacher comments align with the framework of principles and standards for effective assessment practices developed by Gardner et al. (2008, p. 20).Gardner et al. (2008) argue that knowing and using the criteria for the standard of work required demonstrates to students what they should be aiming for and provides them with evidence of how judgments about their learning are made.
The majority of pre-service teachers who participated in this project appreciated having an explicit rubric to guide preparation for their assessment task.Research by Reddy and Andrade (2009) confirmed that students who are provided with rubrics in advance to guide their work generally have a deeper understanding of the assessment task resulting in higher levels of achievement.This is only applicable where students take the time to thoroughly read and actively use the rubric (Jonnson 2010;Jonsson & Svingby 2007).Pre-service teacher's responses also indicated that the rubrics provided made the assessment task transparent and clearly outlined the criteria and expectations by which they were to be judged.From a tutor's perspective, the rubric provided an opportunity to reflect on the criteria for the task/s and design appropriate teaching and learning activities that would assist and lead into the assessment tasks for the unit content (health and physical education).
The analysis of data from semi-structured interviews with tutors revealed that time was a key issue when marking practical assessment tasks.All tutors expressed satisfaction with using iPads in the assessment process but were more impressed by the time-efficient use of the computerassisted grading rubrics.Using mobile devices in this way compared favourably to the previous paper based feedback system as it took took more time and required managing paper and pen while simultaneously attempting to pay attention to the practical assessment task.Gardner et al. (2012) argues that 'time is the most challenging factor when marking' and divides time into an allocation for 'administrative tasks (marking per se) and time spent on engaging with student's work and providing individual feedback' (p.392).Several other researchers (Ahoniemi & Karavirta 2009;Anglin et al. 2008;Milne et al. 2008) confirm that e-tools provide more time to 'Overall the strength of this tool lies in the fact that once the on-line rubric was completed by the tutor, the results and the feedback were immediately available for the students to access' Tutor D The results suggest that the combined use of iPads and rubrics in the assessment process significantly reduced the time required and management of multiple paper items (the workload) by tutors and provided pre-service teachers with valuable and timely feedback.However, the process was not without issues and challenges and these are discussed in detail in the next section.

Challenges and issues
Whilst the overall use of iPads and rubrics could be deemed as successful, judging from the positive response from the pre-service teachers and tutors, the use of the iPads in the assessment process was not totally problem-free.The challenges have been grouped into technical and assessment issues.

Technical issues
1. Access and Maintaining Connectivity to the Internet -This aspect was mentioned as challenging when assessing the physical education micro-teach at an off-campus gymnasium.Two tutors identified the following areas as challenging in this context: 1) Difficulty to access the internet via Wi-Fi at off-campus sites; 2) Difficulty to maintain connectivity; 3) Use of personal iPhone hotspot access to maintain connectivity.All tutors commented that access to internet via Wi-Fi is in most cases was problematic and highly unpredictable.This resulted in the need to purchase and pay for personal 'hotspots' at the tutor's expense.
2. Voice recognition on iPad -Tutors found they needed time to ensure voice recognition function (dictation) was working properly so that the device recorded the comments without error.Considerable editing was required in the first trial using this method.
3. iPad screen capacity -An internal issue with Blackboard was that the screen visibility of the iPads only allowed for a small number of student names to be accessible on the screen.
In order to overcome this issue, pre-service teachers needed to be placed into assessment groups of up to 25.In addition there were challenges with the allocation of the columns for the assessment feedback.The Blackboard site required some preparation of the columns and group allocations before use to overcome this issue.

Assessment issues
1. Time delay caused by moderation processes-As tutors needed to consult with other tutors and moderate across the groups there was a delay in the feedback of a couple of days.This was outweighed by the fact that the use of the voice recognition was both time-efficient and effective in the gymnasium and oval setting as opposed to the use of paper feedback.
2. Complexity of feedback in some cases -One tutor reported that in the case of pre-service teachers who did not perform well in the micro-teaching activity that there was a need to refer to their original lesson plan (on another part of the Blackboard submission system) in order to provide additional feedback.This also caused a short delay in the release of the final student feedback for the task..

3.
Use of microphone to record the pre-service teachers' feedback -Using the dictation function on the iPad was unsuitable in a group setting such as in the Health 'Show and Tell' assessment where comments could be overheard by other pre-service teachers.
Based on the findings tutors were able to identify important benefits for the use of iPads in practical assessment tasks that compensated the occasional lack of access to internet or maintenance of connectivity.The electronic interactive rubric used on Blackboard proved to be time-efficient and an effective way of assessing student's practical performance with the comment section located at the end of the rubric especially useful for additional personalised observations or statements.This resulted in what was considered to be better quality feedback because the process of assessment was quicker which allowed the tutor more time to process the performance evaluated.The benefits seemed to offset the issues and problems and tutors found that generally they were able to complete the task in less time once the issues were identified.
The time saving element of the use of the iPads was substantial as was the reduction in use of paper to provide feedback.The use of the online rubric saved time in terms of supporting workflow efficiency and assisting in the delivery of initial criteria-specific feedback, tutors were able to provide additional in-depth quality comments.
The following were the key areas identified as positive about the mobile assessment strategy adopted in the project: -Time (saved time for paper printing and handing out to pre-service teachers).
-Time saved to write/ prepare and upload the feedback as this was instantly online and could be released once approved-no double handling of the paper.
-Feedback was more directly available (once the assessment feedback was moderated).
-Feedback was more individualised (voice recognition of the tutor's words) and pre-service teachers were provided with a more detailed piece of feedback.
-Rubrics provided clarity of expectations and task performance for tutors and pre-service teachers.
-Pre-service teacher feedback could be linked to individual task criteria and provided by the tutor in a clear and consistent manner.

Conclusion
This paper draws attention to the significant benefits that the use of technology such as iPads and computer-assisted grading rubrics can offer in assessing performance-based assessment tasks in university courses such as health and physical education.The results emphasise the potential of rubrics to help pre-service teachers understand the expectations and targets for their learning and the standard requirements of a particular assignment task.In addition rubrics can provide them with an opportunity to make dependable judgments about their own work that can inform reflection, revision and improvement.The paper also highlights the possible limitations of the technology imposed by lack of connectivity and capacity of the iPad itself.As an added initiative, the results of this pilot study in the form of information and instructions for iPad and online rubric use have been developed and disseminated to other faculties within the university who may have similar performance-based assessment.
This research has implications for the way universities develop consistent and effective methods of assessment and e-learning resources to assist lecturers and tutors in the process.This study raises important considerations for academics about the use of technology and in particular iPads for learning and teaching.The literature highlights the expanding use of iPads and other mobile devices in education from K-12 through to higher education (Byers 2001;Miller 2012;Parkes 2010;Patten et al. 2006;Peluso 2012).One of the goals from the Melbourne Declaration on the Educational Goals for Young Australians (MCEETYA, 2008) emphasises the critical need for young people to develop competencies in ICT and specifically in the use of a variety of devices to become creative and productive users of that technology.This has implications for teacher educators who must be willing and able to model exemplary assessment tasks and feedback to ensure that pre-service teachers have the capability and knowledge of technology integration for the 21st Century classroom.The use of iPads and other mobile technology may support this aim by assisting teacher educators to model exemplary ICT integration.An aspect worth consideration is that the investment in technology such as iPads is costly and will undoubtedly be replaced by other technological tools in the future.It is also evident that with the increase in mobile technology use, we as teacher educators should be addressing how we are using devices such as iPads to inform and shape the preparation of a new generation of teachers.
clarify each assessment task and set a realistic idea of what was required.The following responses to the third question in the survey highlighted their perceptions about the effectiveness of receiving rubric and specific written feedback: 'It is very reassuring to receive additional feedback and suggestions for future assessment' BEd Pre-service Teacher A 'Feedback is very useful to allow me to modify my approaches to teaching' BEd Pre-service Teacher B

'
provide individual feedback and reduces paper usage and generally improves the manual grading process.Tutors in this study indicated several positive reasons for using computed assisted rubrics as shown in the following responses: 'I prefer to provide feedback quickly -this method did' Saved time manually up-loading student's individual grades into the unit's Grade Centre' Tutor C