Understanding learner engagement on a blended course including a MOOC
The use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in blended learning contexts is becoming increasingly common, but relatively little is known about the experiences of on-campus learners taking MOOCs. This article reports research that explored the experiences of on-campus learners taking a blended course which included a MOOC. Use of the UK Engagement Survey provided a focus on engagement and permitted comparisons with a wider cohort of on-campus learners. Findings show that there were no differences between learners on the blended course and the wider cohort of on-campus learners for some aspects of engagement. However, learners on the blended course were more engaged than on-campus learners on specific aspects measured by the UKES survey including those which appear related to social learning. Evidence from a small number of interviews is used to explore issues raised, and informed by the Community of Inquiry framework, factors which influence blended learners’ engagement with the MOOC are discussed. Some of the findings support the call for amendments to the community of inquiry framework for MOOC contexts and provide evidence of issues related to social and teaching presence that may need additional consideration.
Akyol, Z. & Garrison, D. R. (2011) ‘Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bruff, D., et al., (2013) ‘Wrapping a MOOC: student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning’, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 187–199.
Buckley, A. (2014a) ‘How radical is student engagement’, Student Engagement and Experience Journal, vol. 3, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.7190/seej.v3i2.95
Buckley, A. (2014b) UK Engagement Survey 2014: The Second Pilot Year, The Higher Education Academy, York, Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/ukes_report_2014_v2.pdf
Caulfield, M., Collier, A. & Halawa, S. (2013) Rethinking Online Community in MOOCs for Blended Learning (web log post), Available at: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/10/rethinking-online-community-in-moocs-used-for-blended-learning.
Chua, S. M., et al., (2017) ‘Discussion analytics: identifying conversations and social learners in FutureLearn. MOOCs’, LAK-MOOCs-2017 MOOC Analytics: Live Dashboards, Post-Hoc Analytics and the Long-Term Effects, Workshop proceedings. Available at: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1967/FLMOOCS_Paper3.pdf
Cohen, A. & Holstein, S. (2018) ‘Analysing successful massive open online courses using the community of inquiry model as perceived by students’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 544–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12259.
Damm, C. V. A. (2016) ‘Applying a community of inquiry instrument to measure student engagement in large courses’, Current Issues in Emerging ELearning, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 138–172. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol3/iss1/9
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (1999) ‘Critical enquiry in a text based environment: computer conferencing in Higher Education’, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 2, pp. 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2001) ‘Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education’, American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 15, pp. 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Gašević, D., et al., (2014) ‘Where is research on Massive Open Online Courses Headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative’, International Review of Research in Online and Distance Learning, vol. 15, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954
Ghadiri, K., et al., (2013) ‘The transformative potential of blended learning using MIT edX’s 6.002x online MOOC content combined with student team-based learning in class’, https://www.edx.org/sites/default/files/upload/ed-tech-paper.pdf
Howson, C. & Buckley, A. (2016) ‘Development of the UK engagement survey’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1132–1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1235134
Israel, M. J. (2015). ‘Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students’, IRRODL, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 102–118. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222
Jaffer, T., Govender, S. & Brown, C. (2017) ‘“The best part was the contact!” Understanding postgraduate students’ experiences of wrapped MOOCs’, Open Praxis, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 207–221. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.565
Kahan, T., Soffer, T. & Nachmias, R. (2017) ‘Types of participant behavior in a Massive Open Online Course’, IRRODL, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3087
Kovanović, V., et al., (2018) ‘Exploring communities of inquiry in massive open online courses’, Computers and Education, vol. 119, pp. 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.010
Macfarlane, B. & Tomlinson, M. (2017) ‘Critiques of student engagement’, Higher Education Policy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0027-3
Milligan, C. & Littlejohn, A. (2014) ‘Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course’, IRRODL, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 197–213. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1855
Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A. & Margaryan, A. (2013) ‘Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs’, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 149–159. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/milligan_0613.htm
Pascarella, E., Seifert, T. & Blaich, C. (2010) ‘How effective are the NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes’, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380903449060
Rourke, L., et al., (1999) ‘Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing’, The Journal of Distance Education, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 50–71. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/92000/
Sharples, M. (2013) ‘Social learning and large scale online learning’, FutureLearn blog [online] Available at: http://about.futurelearn.com/blog/massive-scale-social-learning/
Sinclair, J. & Kalvala, S. (2016) ‘Student engagement in massive open online courses’, International Journal of Learning Technology (IJLT), vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2016.079035
Trowler, V. (2010) Student Engagement Literature Review, Higher Education Academy, York, UK, Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/studentengagementliteraturereview_1.pdf
Wicks, D. A., et al., (2015) ‘An investigation into the community of inquiry of blended classrooms by a Faculty Learning Community’, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 25, pp. 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.001
Wintrup, J., Wakefield, K. & Davis, H. (2015) Engaged Learning in MOOCs: A Study Using the UK Engagement Survey, Higher Education Academy, York, UK [online], Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/engaged-learning-in-MOOCs.pdf
Yousef, A. M. F., et al., (2015) ‘A usability evaluation of a blended MOOC environment: an experimental case study’, IRRODL, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 69–93. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2032
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.