The Community of Inquiry framework as learning design model: a case study in postgraduate online education

Keywords: online learning, postgraduate, academic professional development, interactive video, conditional release


Interaction within online educational environments has long been advocated as conducive to learning, whether interaction between the learner and their teacher, the learner and online resources or the learner and their peers. The relationship among these three types of interaction is also receiving increasing attention, with the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework providing a method of interpreting this relationship in terms of the interplay of teaching presence, cognitive presence and social presence. This case study investigates the use of the CoI framework as a learning design model, showing how it was used to address specific issues in a postgraduate online module. Specifically, the framework informed decisions to strongly link together interaction with the video content, activity on discussion boards and release of new learning materials. Using discussion board posts and video analytics as the primary evidence of learner engagement, the findings show how learner activity significantly increased in both ‘social’ contexts and ‘cognitive’ contexts. More importantly, analysis also revealed strong correlations among participation in discussions, video viewing and module completion. The study suggests that the CoI framework is a robust model for learning design in online environments.


Download data is not yet available.


Chen, K.-C. & Jang, S.-J. (2010) ‘Motivation in online learning: testing a model of self-determination theory’, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 741–752. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011

Cherney, M. R., Fetherston, M. & Johnsen, L. J. (2018) ‘Online course student collaboration literature: a review and critique’, Small Group Research, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 98–128. doi: 10.1177/1046496417721627

Costley, J., Hughes, C. & Lange, C. (2017) ‘The effects of instructional design on student engagement with video lectures at cyber universities’, Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, vol. 16, pp. 189–207. doi: 10.28945/3728

Delen, E., Liew, J. & Willson, V. (2014) ‘Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: self-regulation in online video-based environments’, Computers & Education, vol. 78, pp. 312–320. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.018

Gafni, R. & Geri, N. (2010) ‘The value of collaborative e-learning: compulsory versus optional online forum assignments’, Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, vol. 6, pp. 335–339.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2010) ‘The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: a retrospective’, Internet and Higher Education, vol. 13, no. 1–2, pp. 5–9. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003

Geri, N., Winer, A. & Zaks, B. (2017) ‘A learning analytics approach for evaluating the impact of interactivity in online video lectures on the attention span of students’, Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, vol. 13, pp. 215–228.

Gulati, S. (2008) ‘Compulsory participation in online discussions: is this constructivism or normalisation of learning?’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 183–192. doi: 10.1080/14703290801950427

Guo, P. J., Kim, J. & Rubin, R. (2014) ‘How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos’, First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale conference, Atlanta, GA, pp. 41–50.

Hrastinski, S. (2008) ‘What is online learner participation? A literature review’, Computers & Education, vol. 51, pp. 1755–1765. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.005

Jones, A. & Issroff, K. (2005) ‘Learning technologies: affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning’, Computers & Education, vol. 44, pp. 395–408. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004

Kahn, P., et al., (2017) ‘Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: the role of reflexivity | SpringerLink’, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 15. doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z

Kovanović, V., et al., (2015) ‘Analytics of communities of inquiry: effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions’, Internet and Higher Education, vol. 27, pp. 74–89. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.002

Kurucay, M. & Inan, F. A. (2017) ‘Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course’, Computers & Education, vol. 115, pp. 20–37. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010

Lee, H., Kim, J. W. & Hackney, R. (2011) ‘Knowledge hoarding and user acceptance of online discussion board systems in eLearning: a case study’, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1431–1437. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.047

Luo, N., Zhang, M. & Qi, D. (2017) ‘Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment’, Computers & Education, vol. 115, pp. 153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006

Moule, P. (2007) ‘Challenging the five-stage model for e-learning: a new approach’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 15, pp. 30–50. doi: 10.1080/09687760601129588

Nerantzi, C. & Gossman, P. (2015) ‘Towards collaboration as learning: evaluation of an open CPD opportunity for HE teachers’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 23. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v23.26967

Ouyang, F. & Scharber, C. (2017) ‘The influences of an experienced instructor’s discussion design and facilitation on an online learning community development: a social network analysis study’, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 35, pp. 34–47. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.07.002

Palincsar, A. S. (1998) ‘Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 49, pp. 345–376. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345

Parks-Stamm, E. J., Zafonte, M. & Palenque, S. M. (2017) ‘The effects of instructor participation and class size on student participation in an online class discussion forum’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1250–1259. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12512

Salmon, G. (2004) E-moderating, 2 edn, Routledge, London.

Stenbom, S. (2018) ‘A systematic review of the Community of Inquiry survey’, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 39, pp. 22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001

Zhang, D., et al., (2006) ‘Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness’, Information & Management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 15–27. doi: 10.1016/

Zydney, J. M., deNoyelles, A. & Kyeong-Ju Seo, K. (2012) ‘Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: an exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions’, Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.009
How to Cite
Nolan-Grant C. R. (2019). The Community of Inquiry framework as learning design model: a case study in postgraduate online education. Research in Learning Technology, 27.
Original Research Articles