Riddles on YouTube: Investigating the potential to engage viewers in reflective thinking
Linear videos continue to be useful technologies for both formal and informal learning. The advent of YouTube has seen the rise of educational channels engaging millions of viewers informally, in the spirit of ‘lifelong learning’. This article investigates the potential of a particular kind of video to engage viewers in reflective thinking. The premise is that viewers, followers who find the channel worthwhile or interesting, should reflect, affirming or changing their answers. The channel Veritasium, with more than 5 million subscribers at the time of this study, posed four questions as ‘riddles’, and then a week later provided solutions. A survey appended to the solutions video was completed by 2220 respondents. About 16%–43% of respondents across all riddles indicated that their answer was correct or that they changed their answer, and 49%–73% reported to have changed their answers. The reasons for not changing answers were inductively coded for each riddle. The emergent categories were the same for the different riddles, from outward focused to inward focused, matching the types of reflective thinking in the extant literature. The responses illustrated how the riddles engaged the viewers in reflective thinking in this social media informal learning context.
Bentley, J., et al., (2019) ‘Smallholders download and share videos from the Internet to learn about sustainable agriculture’, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 92–107. doi: 10.1080/14735903.2019.1567246
Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. (1985) Reflection, Turning Experience into Learning, Kogan Page, London.
Burla, L., et al., (2008) ‘From text to codings’, Nursing Research, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 113–117. doi: 10.1097/01.nnr.0000313482.33917.7d
Carter, B., et al., (2017) ‘Parent-driven campaign videos: An analysis of the motivation and affect of videos created by parents of children with complex healthcare needs’, Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 276–292. doi: 10.1080/24694193.2017.1373160
Coller, B. & Scott, M. (2009) ‘Effectiveness of using a video game to teach a course in mechanical engineering’, Computers & Education, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 900–912. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.012
Covolo, L., et al., (2017) ‘What arguments on vaccinations run through YouTube videos in Italy? A content analysis’, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1693–1699. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1306159
Creswell, J. & Plano Clark, V. (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 801–804. doi: 10.1177/1094428108318066.
Crook, S. J., Sharma, M. D. & Wilson, R. (2015) ‘An evaluation of the impact of 1: 1 laptops on student attainment in senior high school sciences’, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 272–293. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.982229.
CrookedScience, 2019, personal communication.
Dabbagh, N. & Kitsantas, A. (2012) ‘Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning’, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and Education, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.
Dewey, J. (1933) How We Think (1998 ed.). doi: 10.1037/10903-000.
Gosper, M., Malfroy, J. & McKenzie, J. (2013) ‘Students’ experiences and expectations of technologies: An Australian study designed to inform planning and development decisions’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 29, no. 2. doi: 10.14742/ajet.127.
Gray, J., Lindstrøm, C. & Vestli, K. (2017) ‘Khan Academy as a resource for pre-service teachers: A controlled study’, in CERME 10, Feb 2017, Dublin, Ireland. hal-01946341. doi: 10.1119/perc.2017.pr.057.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J. & Rubin, R. (2014) ‘How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos’, in Proceedings of the first ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference, ACM, pp. 41–50. doi: 10.1145/2556325.2566239
Jones, T. & Cuthrell, K. (2011) ‘YouTube: Educational potentials and pitfalls’, Computers in the Schools, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75–85. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2011.553149
Knox, J. & Bayne, S. (2013) ‘Multimodal profusion in the literacies of the massive open online course’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 21. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v21.21422
Liu, C. & Elms, P. (2019) ‘Animating student engagement: The impacts of cartoon instructional videos on learning experience’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 27. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v27.2124
Mayo, A., Sharma, M. D. & Muller, D. A. (2009) ‘Qualitative differences between learning environments using videos in small groups and whole class discussions: A preliminary study in physics’, Research in Science Education, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 477–493. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9090-0.
Mezirow, J. (1997) ‘Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice’, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, vol. 1997, no. 74, pp. 5–12. doi: 10.1002/ace.7401.
Mezirow, J. (1998) ‘On critical reflection’, Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 185–198. doi: 10.1177/074171369804800305.
Muller, D. A., et al., (2007) ‘Conceptual change through vicarious learning in an authentic physics setting’, Instructional Science, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 519–533. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9017-6.
Pithadia, D. J., et al., (2019) ‘A cross-sectional study of YouTube videos as a source of patient information for topical psoriasis therapies’, Journal of Dermatological Treatment, (just-accepted), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1597247.
Rodgers, C. (2002) ‘Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking’, Teachers College Record, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 842–866. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00181.
Rogers, R. R. (2001) ‘Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis’, Innovative Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 37–57. doi: 10.1023/a:1010986404527.
Rosenthal, S. (2017) ‘Motivations to seek science videos on YouTube: Free-choice learning in a connected society’, International Journal of Science Education, Part B, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 22–39. doi: 10.1080/21548455.2017.1371357.
Sinfield, D. (2018) ‘The boundaries of education: Using mobile devices for connecting people to places’, ALTJ-Association for Learning Technology Journal, vol. 26. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2121.
Stieff, M. (2005) ‘Connected chemistry—A Novel Modeling Environment for the Chemistry Classroom’, Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 82, no.3, p.489. doi: 10.1021/ed082p489.
Tan, E. & Pearce, N. (2011) ‘Open education videos in the classroom: Exploring the opportunities and barriers to the use of YouTube in teaching introductory sociology’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 19(sup1), p.7783. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v19s1/7783.
Wade, R. C. (ed) (1997) Community Service-Learning: A Guide to Including Service in the Public School Curriculum: Challenges to Effective Practice, The Social Studies, 88(5), pp. 197–202. doi: 10.1080/00377999709603778.
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K. & Perkins, K. K. (2008) ‘PhET: Simulations that enhance learning’, Science, vol. 322, no. 5902, pp. 682–683. doi: 10.1126/science.1161948.
Yeung, A., Raju, S. & Sharma, M. D. (2016) ‘Online lecture recordings and lecture attendance: Investigating student preferences in a large first year psychology course’, Journal of Learning Design, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 55–71. doi: 10.5204/jld.v9i1.243.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.