Exploring 30 years of research in learning technology: an analysis of the RLT journal

  • Julie Voce Learning Enhancement and Development, City St George’s, University of London, London, England http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9351-530X
  • Liz Bennett School of Education and Professional Development, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, England
  • James Brunton School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland; and Department of Financial Accounting, University of South Africa, Dublin, Ireland
  • Evana Downes Rolewicz Learning Enhancement and Development, City St George’s, University of London, London, England
  • Michael Flavin School of Global Affairs, King’s College London, London, England
  • Sarah Honeychurch Academic and Digital Development, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
  • Tünde Varga-Atkins Centre for Innovation in Education, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v32.3332
Keywords: learning technology, research, journal, content analysis, international

Abstract

This paper presents the findings from a research project to analyse 30 years of the Research in Learning Technology journal (1993 to 2022). The analysis explores the content of the articles in terms of key topics and their relationship with sector events and policies, discussing key terms such as virtual learning environment, massive open online courses (MOOCs) and virtual reality (VR). It also considers how the terminology used to describe the field has changed over time, starting with a focus on the computer and expanding to include a range of common terms such as e-learning, technology enhanced learning (TEL) and digital. Between 1993 and 2015, issues of the journal were accompanied by editorials. This analysis considers how the role of the editorials helped to shape and establish the journal and influence the field of learning technology to take a more research and theory-based approach. Finally, an analysis of the locations of the authors who have published in the journal has demonstrated a shift from a predominantly UK-based journal to one with more international reach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


Aalborg University. (n.d.). Previous networked learning conferences. Retrieved from https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/previous-networked-learning-conferences-and-events


Agbonifo, O. C., Sarumi, O. A., & Akinola, Y. M. (2020). A chemistry laboratory platform enhanced with virtual reality for students’ adaptive learning. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2419. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2419


Anthony, L. (2023). AntConc (Version 4.2.4) [Computer Software]. Waseda University. Retrieved from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software


Association for Learning Technology. (2024). Archives. Research in Learning Technology. Retrieved from https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/issue/archive


Atenas, J., & Havemann, L. (2014). Questions of quality in repositories of open educational resources: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 22, 20889. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.20889


Aubusson, P., Schuck, S., & Burden, K. (2009). Mobile learning for teacher professional learning: Benefits, obstacles and issues. Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v17i3.10879


Barker, P. (1993). Virtual reality: Theoretical basis, practical applications. Research in Learning Technology, 1(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v1i1.9463


Beetham, H. (2005). e-Learning research: Emerging issues? Research in Learning Technology, 13(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v13i1.10976


Bell F., Mackness, J., & Funes, M. (2016). Participant association and emergent curriculum in a MOOC: Can the community be the curriculum? Research in Learning Technology, 24, 29927. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29927


Bell, F., Schmoller, S., & Sharpe, R. (2012). Editorial: Going for gold: Research in Learning Technology makes the switch to a fully Open Access publishing model. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 17163. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.17163


Bennett, L., & Folley, S. (2014). A tale of two doctoral students: Social media tools and hybridised identities. Research in Learning Technology, 22, 23791. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.23791


Brunton, J., et al. (2023). Research in Learning Technology: Making friends and influencing people. Research in Learning Technology, 31, 3212. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.3212


Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2019). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 12–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12730


Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.


Brown, S. (1998). Reinventing the university. Research in Learning Technology, 6(3), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v6i3.11165


Burgstahler, S. (2006). The development of accessibility indicators for distance learning programs. Research in Learning Technology, 14(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v14i1.10935


Celik, C., Guven, G., & Kozcu Cakir, N. (2020). Integration of mobile augmented reality (MAR) applications into biology laboratory: Anatomic structure of the heart. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2355. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2355


Cochrane, T., & Narayan, V. (2013). Redesigning professional development: Reconceptualising teaching using social learning technologies. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 19226. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.19226


Cochrane, T. D., et al. (2018). Authentic interprofessional health education scenarios using mobile VR. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 2130. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2130


Conole, G. (2006). Understanding and making practice explicit. Research in Learning Technology, 14(3), 10958. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v14i3.10958


Conole, G. (2007). What constitutes good research in e-learning—Are there lessons we can draw from the Research Assessment Exercise? Research in Learning Technology, 15(3), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v15i3.10929


Cornelius, S., & Heywood, I. (1998). An interactive learning environment in geographical information systems. Research in Learning Technology, 6(2), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v6i2.11005


Cornelius, S., & Marston, P. (2009). Towards an understanding of the virtual context in mobile learning. Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v17i3.10874


Czerkawski, B., & Berti, M. (2021). Learning experience design for augmented reality. Research in Learning Technology, 29, 2429. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2429


Dale, V. M., Sullivan, M., & Irvine, D. R. (1999). Computer-assisted learning as an alternative to didactic lectures: A study of teaching the physics of diagnostic imaging. Research in Learning Technology, 7(3), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v7i3.11563


De Freitas, S., & Roberts, G. P. (2003). Does distance e-learning work? A comparison between distance and face-to-face learners using e-learning materials. Research in Learning Technology, 11(3), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v11i3.11286


Essmiller, K., et al. (2020). Exploring mixed reality based on self-efficacy and motivation of users. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2331. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2331


Flavin, M., & Quintero, V. (2018). UK higher education institutions’ technology-enhanced learning strategies from the perspective of disruptive innovation. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 1987. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.1987


Green, S., et al. (2006). Accessibility and adaptability of learning objects: Responding to metadata, learning patterns and profiles of needs and preferences. Research in Learning Technology, 14(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v14i1.10938


Groat, A., & Musson, T. (1995). Learning styles: Individualizing computer-based learning environments. Research in Learning Technology, 3(2). 53–62. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v3i2.9610


Hamburger, H. (1993). Finely integrated media for language learning. Research in Learning Technology, 1(1), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v1i1.9473


Jacobs, G. (1993a). Standards. Research in Learning Technology, 1(1), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v1i1.9461


Jacobs, G. (1993b). Technology and plagiarism. Research in Learning Technology, 1(2), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v1i2.9476


Jacobs, G. (1994). Editorial. Research in Learning Technology, 2(2), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v2i2.9577


Jacobs, G. (1995). Editorial. Research in Learning Technology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v3i1.9585


Jacobs, G. (1996). Is there a way? Research in Learning Technology, 4(3), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v4i3.9973


Jacobs, G. (1997). Editorial Research recognition. Research in Learning Technology, 5(3), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v5i3.10566


Jacobs, G. (1998). Time for a change. Research in Learning Technology, 6(2), 11002. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v6i2.11002


Jacobs, G., & Heath, S. (1995). Enabling active learning. Research in Learning Technology, 3(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968776950030101


JISC. (2004). e-Learning programme. Projects. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20040928084353/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=programme_elearning


Johnson, M. I., Dewhurst, D. G., & William, A. D. (1997). Computer-based interactive tutorial versus traditional lecture for teaching introductory aspects of pain. Research in Learning Technology, 5(3), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v5i3.10568


Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2007). Motivation and mobile devices: Exploring the role of appropriation and coping strategies. Research in Learning Technology, 15(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v15i3.10934


Jones, C. (2004). Networks and learning: Communities, practices and the metaphor of networks. Research in Learning Technology, 12(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v12i1.11227


Jones, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2011). Theory in learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 17107. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i3.17107


Jones, G., Edwards, G., & Reid, A. (2009). How can mobile SMS communication support and enhance a first year undergraduate learning environment? Research in Learning Technology, 17(3). 201–218. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v17i3.10877


Jones, R., & Shields, E. (2018). Using games to disrupt the conference Twittersphere. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 2036. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2036


Jones, C., et al. (2022). Providing dementia education with augmented reality: A health sciences and medicine feasibility pilot study. Research in Learning Technology, 30, 2668. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2668


Kennedy, G. (1998) An introduction to corpus linguistics (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315843674


Knox, J., & Bayne, S. (2013). Multimodal profusion in the literacies of the Massive Open Online Course. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 21422. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21422


Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24, 29369. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29369


Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.


Lawrence, K. C., & Fakuade, O. V. (2021). Parental involvement, learning participation and online learning commitment of adolescent learners during the COVID-19 lockdown. Research in Learning Technology, 29, 2544. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2544


Leathard, H. L., & Dewhurst, D. G. (1995). Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of a computer-assisted learning program with a tutored demonstration to teach intestinal motility to medical students. Research in Learning Technology, 3(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v3i1.9603


Lewis, B., & Rush, D. (2013). Experience of developing Twitter-based communities of practice in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 18598. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.18598


Lisewski, B. (2004). Implementing a learning technology strategy: Top–down strategy meets bottom–up culture. Research in Learning Technology, 12(2), 11250. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v12i2.11250


Lisewski, B., & Joyce, P. (2003). Examining the five-stage e-moderating model: Designed and emergent practice in the learning technology profession. Research in Learning Technology, 11(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v11i1.11267


Liu, C. (2018). Social media as a student response system: New evidence on learning impact. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 2043. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2043


Makhno, K., Kireeva N., & Shurygin V. (2022). The impact of online learning technology on self-regulation and student success. Research in Learning Technology, 30, 2802. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2802


Munnerley, D., et al. (2012). Confronting an augmented reality. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19189


O’Riordan, T., Millard, D. E., & Schulz, J. (2016). How should we measure online learning activity? Research in Learning Technology, 24, 30088. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.30088


Office for Students. (2002) Blended learning review. Retrieved from https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/media/dc1c3c84-269a-4c40-8f87-15bfae0fcced/blended-learning-review-panel-report.pdf


Orsini-Jones, M., & Jones, D. (1996). Hypermedia for language learning: The FREE model at Coventry University. Research in Learning Technology, 4(2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v4i2.9965


Ozyurt, O., & Ayaz, A. (2022). Twenty-five years of education and information technologies: Insights from a topic modeling based bibliometric analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 11025–11054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11071-y


Pan, Z., et al. (2021). Introducing augmented reality in early childhood literacy learning. Research in Learning Technology, 29, 2539. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2539


Pande, P., et al. (2021). Long-term effectiveness of immersive VR simulations in undergraduate science learning: Lessons from a media-comparison study. Research in Learning Technology, 29, 2482. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2482


Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html


Pearson, E. J., & Koppi, T. (2002). Inclusion and online learning opportunities: Designing for accessibility. Research in Learning Technology, 10(2). 17–28. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v10i2.11398


Pfeiffer, V. D., et al. (2009). Situated learning in the mobile age: Mobile devices on a field trip to the sea. Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v17i3.10876


Phipps, L., & Kelly, B. (2006). Holistic approaches to e-learning accessibility. Research in Learning Technology, 14(1). 69–78. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v14i1.10939


Reed, P. (2013). Hashtags and retweets: Using Twitter to aid Community, Communication and Casual (informal) learning. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 19692. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.19692


Reeves, L., et al. (2021). Use of augmented reality (AR) to aid bioscience education and enrich student experience. Research in Learning Technology, 29, 2572. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2572


Richards, S. (1994). Computer-based learning in psychology using interactive laboratories. Research in Learning Technology, 2(2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v2i2.9579


Rogers, S. L. (2020). Cheap, accessible, and virtual experiences as tools for immersive study: A proof of concept study. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2416. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2416


Russell, C. (2009). A systemic framework for managing e-learning adoption in campus universities: Individual strategies in context. Research in Learning Technology, 17(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760802649871


Salmon, G. (2005). Flying not flapping: A strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. Research in Learning Technology, 13(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v13i3.11218


Salmon, G., et al. (2015). The space for social media in structured online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.28507


Sato, M. (2015). Time, chronology, and periodization in history. In J. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 409–414). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.62148-7


Sharpe, R. (2009). Engagement in learning and development. Research in Learning Technology, 17(1), 10770. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v17i1.10770


Sharpe, R. (2010). A snapshot of research in learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 18(2), 85–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687769.2010.499207


Sharpe R. (2011). Evidence and evaluation in learning technology research. Research in Learning Technology, 19(1), 17102. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i1.17102


Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., & Francis, R. (2006). Implementing a university e-learning strategy: Levers for change within academic schools. Research in Learning Technology, 14(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v14i2.10952


Shi, Y., & Lin, X. (2021). Exploring the characteristics of adults’ online learning activities: A case study of EdX online institute. Research in Learning Technology, 29, 2622. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2622


Sinfield, D. L. (2018). The boundaries of education: Using mobile devices for connecting people to places. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 2121. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2121


Sloan, D., Stratford, J., & Gregor, P. (2006). Using multimedia to enhance the accessibility of the learning environment for disabled students: Reflections from the Skills for Access project. Research in Learning Technology, 14(1). 39–54. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v14i1.10947


Smailes, J., & Gannon-Leary, P. (2011). Peer mentoring – Is a virtual form of support a viable alternative? Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i2.10351


Smith, C., & Jagodzinski, P. (1995). The implementation of a multimedia learning environment for graduate civil engineers. Research in Learning Technology, 3(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v3i1.9589


Tompsett, C., & Alsop, G. (2003). On reification: A reinterpretation of designed and emergent practice. Research in Learning Technology, 11(2), 61–63. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v11i2.11277


Varga-Atkins, T. (2016). A study of the role of a technology-enhanced learning implementation group in mediating an institutional VLE minimum standards policy. Research in Learning Technology, 24, 32815. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.32815


Watson, P., & Livingstone, D. (2018). Using mixed reality displays for observational learning of motor skills: A design research approach enhancing memory recall and usability. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 2129. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2129


White, C. (1995). Microwave workshop for Windows. Research in Learning Technology, 3(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v3i1.9593


Whitelock, D., et al. (2003). Analysing tutor feedback to students: First steps towards constructing an electronic monitoring system. Research in Learning Technology, 11(3), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v11i3.11283


Zafitsara, J., & Velo, N. M. A. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 2020–2021 academic year at Fianarantsoa University: The use of Facebook as a mode to switch to online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 30. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2673
Published
2024-09-13
How to Cite
Voce J., Bennett L., Brunton J., Downes Rolewicz E., Flavin M., Honeychurch S., & Varga-Atkins T. (2024). Exploring 30 years of research in learning technology: an analysis of the RLT journal. Research in Learning Technology, 32. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v32.3332
Issue
Vol. 32 (2024)
Section
Original Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC