Adopting open textbooks in Moroccan secondary physics and chemistry education: a case study

Sara Ouahib; Rachid Bendaoud; Khalid Berrada

doi:10.25304/rlt.v34.3403

Sara Ouahib High Energy Physics, Astrophysics and Geoscience Laboratory, TransERIE, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco
Rachid Bendaoud High Energy Physics, Astrophysics and Geoscience Laboratory, TransERIE, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco
Khalid Berrada Faculty of Sciences of Rabat, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v34.3403

Keywords: open textbooks, K–12 education, OER, Open Educational Practices, openness

Abstract

Identified as the single most predominant curriculum delivery vehicle in schools, textbooks not only play a crucial role in disseminating knowledge and organising learning objectives but also reflect learning approaches and curricular orientations. In Morocco, as in many developing countries, the process of updating textbooks is often slow and struggles to keep pace with rapid technological advancements, resulting in significant gaps in students’ learning experiences, especially for physics and chemistry, which require experimental material and contemporary examples. The rise of digital educational resources, such as Open Educational Resources (OERs) and open textbooks, presents an opportunity to address these challenges by offering a more accessible, dynamic and regularly updated version of this indispensable teaching material. This study investigates the impact of adopting an open textbook dedicated to the physics and chemistry course at the scientific common core level in the secondary cycle (K–12) in Morocco on student learning outcomes by providing a qualitative and quantitative analysis involving a sample of 160 students over two academic years 2022/2023 and 2023/2024. Data were collected using a questionnaire developed around the four components of the COUP (Cost, Outcomes, Usage and Perceptions) framework. Results have shown positive feedback from students praising the accessibility, affordability and interactive features of the open textbook, enriching their learning experiences and helping to improve their academic performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altbach et al. (Eds.). (1991). Textbooks in American society: Politics, policy, and pedagogy (261 p.). State University of New York Press.

Arcos, B., & Weller, M. (2018). A tale of two globes: exploring the north/south divide in engagement with open educational resources. In J. Schöpfel & U. Herb (Eds.), Open divide: Critical studies on open access. Litwin Books. 147–155. http://litwinbooks.com/open-divide.php

Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1989). Designing science textbooks to enhance student understanding. Educational Psychologist, 24(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2403_5

Clinton, V., & Khan, S. (2019). Efficacy of open textbook adoption on learning performance and course withdrawal rates: a meta-analysis. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419872212

Cox, G., Willmers, M., & Masuku, B. (2022). Sustainable open textbook models for social justice. Frontiers in Education, 7, 881998. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.881998

CSEFR. (2015). Vision Stratégique de la Réforme : Pour Une École de L’équité, de la Qualité et de la Promotion. Retrieved from https://www.csefrs.ma/publications/vision-strategique-de-la-reforme/?lang=fr

Delimont, N. et al. (2016). University students and faculty have positive perceptions of open/ alternative resources and their utilization in a textbook replacement initiative. Research in Learning Technology, 24(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29920

Digital Open Textbooks for Development. (2021). Open Textbooks in South African Higher Education: Towards a National Agenda. Retrieved from https://ched.uct.ac.za/dot4d/articles/2021-10-27-open-textbooks-south-african-higher-education-towards-national-agenda

Farrow, R., Pitt, R., & Weller, M. (2020). Open textbooks as an innovation route for open science pedagogy. Education for Information, 36, 227–245. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-190260

Fischer, L. et al. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x

Friesike, S. et al. (2015). Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(4), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9375-6

Gaskell, A., & Mills, R. (2015). The quality and reputation of open, distance and e-learning: what are the challenges? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.993603

Griffiths, R., Mislevy, J., & Shuai, W. (2022). Encouraging impacts of an Open Education Resource Degree Initiative on college students’ progress to degree. Higher Education, 84, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-022-00817-9

HCETSR. (2015). For a School of Equity, Quality and Promotion. A Report of the Higher Consil of Edcuation Trainning and Scientific Research (p. 99). Retrieved from https://www.csefrs.ma/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Résumé-vision-Anglais-AR.pdf

Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-016-9434-9

Hilton III, J. (2020). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: a synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 853–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4

Huang, R. et al. (2020). Guidance on Open Educational Practices During School Closures : Utilizing OER under COVID-19 Pandemic in Line with UNESCO OER Recommendation. UNESCO, 1. Retrieved from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/

Jemni, M., & Khribi, M. K. (2016). Toward empowering open and online education in the arab world through OER and MOOCs. In Lecture Notes in Educational Technology (Issue 9783662529232). Springer, 73–100.

Jimes, C., Weiss, S., & Keep, R. (2013). Addressing the local in localization: a case study of open textbook adoption by three south african teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 17(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v17i2.359

Jobrack, B. (2012). Tyranny of the textbook: an insider exposes how educational materials undermine reforms. (248 p.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-7022

Kimmons, R. (2016). Expansive openness in teacher practice. Teachers College Record, 118(9), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800901

Lambert, S. R., & Fadel, H. (2022). Open Textbooks and Social Justice: A National Scoping Study. 1–81. Retrieved from https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/publications/open-textbooks-social-justice/

Ljubljana. (2017). Ljubljana OER Action Plan 2017. 2nd OER Congress. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ljubljana\_oer\_action\_plan\_2017.pdf

Llorent-Bedmar, V. (2014). Educational reforms in morocco: evolution and current status. International Education Studies, 7(12), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n12p95

Luo, T. et al. (2020). The power of open: benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learning, 35(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222

Ma, H. (2021). Empowering digital learning with open textbooks. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09916-9

Mason, S. L., & Kimmons, R. (2018). Effects of open textbook adoption on teachers’ open practices. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3517

Miao, F. et al. (2019). Guidelines on the Development of Open Educational Resources Policies. UNESCO Publishing.

Oelfke, A. L. et al. (2021). Using open educational resources at Viterbo University: faculty and student feedback. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V22I1.4970

OpenMed. (2016). OER Morocco Declaration. Retrieved from https://openmedproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/OER-Morocco-Declaration.pdf

Ouahib, S. et al. (2022). Open educational resources as a global solution for wider class courses. In K. Berrada & D. Burgos (Eds.), Pedagogy, didactics and educational technologies, Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, 31–48. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5137-4_4

Ouahib, S. et al. (2023). OER as a certain solution for uncertain times: a reflection on the initiatives undertaken in Morocco during the covid-19 period. Education Ouverte et Libre – Open Education, 2, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.52612/JOURNALS/EOL-OE.2023.E1118

Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211

Robinson, T. J. et al. (2014). The impact of open textbooks on secondary science learning outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14550275

SCDM. (2021). The new development model. New England Review, 42(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.1353/ner.2021.0041

Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20019

Tennant, J. P. et al. (2019). Ten Myths Around Open Scholarly Publishing. PeerJ Preprints. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27580v1

Tlili, A. et al. (2020). Current state of open educational resources in the Arab region: an investigation in 22 countries. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00120-z

Tonks, D. L. et al. (2013). « Opening » a new kind of high school: the story of the open high school of utah. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1345

UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the Impact of Open Courseware for Higher Education in Developing Countries–Final Report. 3(July), 15–18. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000128515

Van Allen, J., & Katz, S. (2023). Viewing open education within the Technological, Pedagogical, Content Framework: illustrating educator knowledge, skills and dispositions. Research in Learning Technology, 31, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.2829

Wiley, D. et al. (2012). A Preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in middle and high school science classes. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1153

Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V19I4.3601