A digital competence training program design based on DigComp 2.1

Keywords: Digital competence, DigComp 2.1, instructional design, middle school students, mixed-methods design

Abstract

This study aims to design a comprehensive and theoretically grounded digital competence training program for middle school students, based on DigComp 2.1: The European Digital Competence Framework. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. In the first phase, the Digital Competence Identification Survey (DCIS) was administered to 262 teachers to identify the most essential competencies for seventh-grade learners. Teachers’ evaluations focused on both the perceived importance of digital competencies and their suitability for the seventh-grade level. The quantitative findings were compared with the DigComp framework and the related literature, and the content development process was refined through expert review by three specialists. Rather than producing an assessment-oriented outcome, the study translated the identified competencies into a structured instructional design. The competencies selected through this process were organized into three instructional units: Information Literacy, Digital Content, and Ethics and Safety. The resulting program includes 10 themes, 22 instructional hours, and 45 learning outcomes structured according to Bloom’s Taxonomy and aligned with the basic, intermediate, and advanced proficiency levels of DigComp 2.1. Data analysis combined descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Instrument reliability was confirmed through high internal consistency coefficients, and content validity was ensured via expert consensus and iterative refinement. The developed program demonstrates strong alignment with national and international policy documents, including the Turkish Qualifications Framework, the Digital Turkey Action Plan, the MoNE 2023 Education Vision, and the EU Digital Education Action Plan. The study demonstrates a replicable process for translating broad digital competence frameworks into localized, actionable curricula for underserved middle school student populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding (pp. 7–60). Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.




Alptekin, Z. (2023). An Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Teaching Practices in Terms of Digital Competence. Master’s thesis, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University. (in Turkish).




Bayrakçı, S. (2020). Digital Literacy as a Set of Digital Competences: A Scale Development Study. Doctoral dissertation, Marmara University. (in Turkish).




Calvani, A. et al. (2008). Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school. Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society, 4(3), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/288




Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with Eight Proficiency Levels and Examples of Use. Publications Office of the European Union.




Creswell, J. W. (2017). Introduction to Mixed Method Research (M. Sözbilir, Trans.). Pegem Akademi Publishing. (in Turkish).




Çevik, E., & Toplu, M. (2023). Reflections of digital inequality in hybrid education. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 37(4), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.24146/tk.1356841 (in Turkish)




Çiftçi, S., Sağlam, A., & Yayla, A. (2021). Students, teachers, and educational environments in the context of 21st-century skills. RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 24, 718–734. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.995863 (in Turkish)




Ekmen, C., & Bakar, E. (2018). The place of digital competence in primary education curricula and textbooks. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 48(221), 5–35. (in Turkish).




Ergül, K. (2019). Developing 9th Grade Students’ Digital Competencies as Part of Statistics Lessons. Master’s thesis, Yeditepe University. (in Turkish).




Erişen, Y., Gürültü, E., & Bildik, C. (2018). Evaluation of digital competence by information technology teachers in Turkey in the context of 21st century skills and the quality framework of Ministry of Education. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(7), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1254623




Erten, P. (2019). Attitudes of Generation Z toward digital technology. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 10(1), 190–202. (in Turkish).




Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. JRC Technical Reports. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Commission.




Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.




Geçgel, H., Kana, F., & Eren, D. (2020). Examining the concept of digital competence in Turkish education from different perspectives. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 8(3), 886–904. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.742352 (in Turkish)




Görgün Baran, A., & Erdem, M. T. (2017). Digital divide in the information society: A discussion based on ICT usage skills. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 22(Special Issue), 1505–1518. (in Turkish).




Hatlevik, O. E., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2015). Examining factors predicting students’ digital competence. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.28945/2126




Hazar, E. (2018). Digital competence in primary education: The case of Turkish language, mathematics, and personal and social development courses. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 5(2), 443–458.




Ilomäki, L., Kantosalo, A., & Lakkala, M. (2011). What is digital competence? In Linked Portal (pp. 1–12). European Schoolnet (EUN). Retrieved from https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/files/48681684/Ilom_ki_etal_2011_What_is_digital_competence.pdf




Kırık, A. M., & Altun, E. (2019). A content analysis of the YouTube Kids application in the context of new media and Generation Z. Anemon Muş Alparslan University Journal of Social Sciences, 7(6), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.526344 (in Turkish)




Kızılkaya Namlı, A. (2021). Education & Science 2021. Efe Akademi. (in Turkish).




Kocatürk Kapucu, N. (2023). Evaluation of faculty members’ digital competence levels in the context of technology use in distance education courses. Doctoral dissertation, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University. (in Turkish).




Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2023). Education Vision 2023 for a Stronger Future. Retrieved from https://www.gmka.gov.tr/dokumanlar/yayinlar/2023_E%C4%9Fitim%20Vizyonu.pdf




Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology [MoSIT]. (2018). Turkey’s industrial Revolution: Digital Turkey Roadmap. Retrieved from https://www.gmka.gov.tr/dokumanlar/yayinlar/2023_Dijital-Turkiye-Yol-Haritasi.pdf




Mifsud, G. (2020). An Applied Digital Competences Curriculum for Secondary Schools. Master’s thesis, University of Malta.




Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016




Ng, D. T. K. et al. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041




Özdemir, Ş. (2021). Examining media usage habits of generations in the age of social media. İstanbul Arel University Journal of Communication Studies, 9(20), 281–308. (in Turkish).




Öztemel, E. (2018). Evaluation of new trends in education and Education 4.0. University Research Journal, 1(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.382041 (in Turkish)




Talan, T., & Aktürk, C. (2021). Examining high school students’ levels of digital literacy and information security awareness. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(1), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.668255 (in Turkish)




Tülübaş, T. et al. (2023). An interview with ChatGPT on emergency remote teaching: A comparative analysis based on human–AI collaboration. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.122.6




Turkey Vocational Qualifications Authority [TVQA]. (2015). Turkish Qualifications Framework. Ankara. Retrieved from https://myk.gov.tr/images/articles/editor/130116/TYC_teblig_2.pdf




Ünal, S., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2023). Digital literacy, digital addiction, and virtual loneliness levels of high school students. Bayburt University Journal of Education Faculty, et 18(37), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.1210839 (in Turkish)




UNESCO (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. UNESCO.




Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens – With New Examples of Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union.




Vuorikari, R. et al. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model. Publications Office of the European Union.
Published
2026-03-13
How to Cite
Canoğulları , E., & Sarı , M. (2026). A digital competence training program design based on DigComp 2.1. Research in Learning Technology, 34. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v34.3848
Section
Original Research Articles