Concept mapping and other formalisms as Mindtools for representing knowledge

  • David H. Jonassen
  • Rose M. Marra

Abstract

We seek to provide an alternative theoretical perspective on concept mapping (a formalism for representing structural knowledge) to that provided by Ray McAleese in this issue of ALT-J (auto-monitoring). We begin with an overview of concept maps as a means of describing a learner's knowledge constructs, and then discuss a broader class of tools, Mindtools, of which concept maps are a member. We proceed by defining Mindtools as formalisms for representing knowledge, and further elaborate on concept maps as a formalism for representing a particular kind of knowledge: structural knowledge. We then address McAleese's use of the term auto-monitoring and some of the steps in his model of concept maps. Finally, we describe some limitations of concept mapping as a formalism and as a cognitive learning strategy.

DOI:10.1080/0968776940020107

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (1). Concept mapping and other formalisms as Mindtools for representing knowledge. Research in Learning Technology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v2i1.9573
Section
Original Research Articles