Folk pedagogies and pseudo-theories: how lecturers rationalise their digital teaching
The gap in knowledge about how learning theories relate to everyday digital teaching practices in universities inhibits scholarly and practical developments in this area. This article reports on part of a qualitative research project which identified patterns across teaching modes, descriptions and accompanying rationales. It found that learning theories played a minor role in educators’ rationales, even though many of their teaching practices could be described as pedagogically ‘sound’. Although social constructivist approaches were strongly represented in the data, the most widespread rationales for technology uses were folk pedagogies and pseudo-educational theories. This contradicts much of what scholarship and ‘edtech’ culture espouses as pedagogically led technology use. Such educational technology orthodoxies hinder the progress of theory use in this area and fail to address the realities of how lecturers use digital technologies. While it may come as no surprise that educators did not articulate their practices referencing learning theories, the dominance of pseudo-theories in this research represents a threat to the criticality of scholarship and practice in this area. This article recommends that critical and scholarly approaches to digital teaching are encouraged, and that folk and pseudo-theories are acknowledged and leveraged in the support and development of digital teaching.
Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (2011) ‘Three generations of distance education pedagogy’, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 80–97. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890.
Bates, T. (2012) What’s Right and What’s Wrong about Coursera- Style MOOCs, [online] Available at: http://www.tonybates.ca/2012/08/05/whats-right-and-whats-wrong-about-coursera-style-moocs/
Bayne, S. & Ross, J. (2011) ‘“Digital Native”and “Digital Immigrant” Discourses’, in Digital Differences: Perspectives on Online Education, eds S. Bayne & R. Land, pp. 159–169, [online] Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-6091-580-2_12
Bennett, S. & Oliver, M. (2011) ‘Talking back to theory: the missed opportunities in learning technology research’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 179–189. doi: 10.1080/21567069.2011.624997.
Bulfin, S., Henderson, M. & Johnson, N. (2013) ‘Examining the use of theory within educational technology and media research’, Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 337–344. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.790315.
Cuevas, J. (2015) ‘Is learning styles-based instruction effective? A comprehensive analysis of recent research on learning styles’, Theory and Research in Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 308–333. doi: 10.1177/1477878515606621.
Cumming, T. (2015) ‘Challenges of “thinking differently” with rhizoanalytic approaches: a reflexive account’, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 137–148. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2014.896892.
Ho, A., Watkins, D. & Kelly, M. (2001) ‘The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: an evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme’, Higher Education, vol. 42, pp. 143–169. doi: 10.1023/A:1017546216800.
Howard, S. & Maton, K. (2011) ‘Theorising knowledge practices: a missing piece of the educational technology puzzle’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 191–206. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v19i3.17109.
Hunt, C. and Higher Education Strategy Group (2011) National Strategy for Higher Education to 2030, Department of Education and Skills, Dublin, Ireland, [online] Available at: http://www.hea.ie/files/files/DES_Higher_Ed_Main_Report.pdf
Johri, A. (2011) ‘The socio-materiality of learning practices and implications for the field of learning technology’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 207–217. doi: 10.1080/21567069.2011.624169.
Jones, C., et al., (2010) ‘Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university?’, Computers and Education, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 722–732. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022.
Kanuka, H. (2006) ‘Instructional design and e-learning: a discussion of pedagogical content knowledge as a missing construct’, E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–17.
Kanuka, H. (2008) ‘Understanding e-learning technologies-in-practice through philosophies-in-practice’, in Theory and Practice of Online Learning, ed T. Anderson, Athabasca University Press, Edmonton, AB, pp. 91–118. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-324-0.
Kemp, S. J. (2013) ‘Exploring the use of learner-focused teaching approaches in different academic disciplines’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 804–818. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2012.684041.
Moir, J. (2012) Developing and Supporting the Curriculum: Challenges and Changes for Staff, The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, Glasgow, [online] Available at: http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/pages/docdetail/docs/publications/developing-and-supporting-the-curriculum-challenges-and-changes-for-staff
Oliver, M. (2011) ‘Technological determinism in educational technology research: some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 373–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x.
Olson, D. R. & Bruner, J. S. (1996) ‘Folk psychology and folk pedagogy’, in The Handbook of Education and Human Development: New Models of Learning Teaching and Schooling, eds D. R. Olson and N. Torrance, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 9–27.
Selwyn, N. (2010) ‘Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 65–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x.
The Scottish Government (2010) Building a Smarter Future: Towards a Sustainable Scottish Solution for the Future of Higher Education, Scottish Government, Edinburgh, [online] Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/335256/0109656.pdf
Torff, B. (1999) ‘Tacit knowledge in teaching: folk pedagogy and teacher education’, in Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice, eds R. J. Sternberg and J. A. Horvath, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 195–214.
Watters, A. (2016) Re·Con·Figures: The Pigeons of Ed-Tech, Hack Education, [online] Available at: http://hackeducation.com/2016/09/22/pigeon
Wheeler, S. (2015) Personal Technologies in Education: Issues, Theories and Debates, [online] Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/264371745/Dr-S-Wheeler-Personal-Technologies-in-Education-Issues-Theories-and-Debates
Wu, W. H., et al., (2012) ‘Investigating the learning-theory foundations of game-based learning: a meta-analysis’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 265–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00437.x.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.