The seven principles of online learning: Feedback from faculty and alumni on its importance for teaching and learning
Effective online teaching and learning requires a carefully designed classroom that promotes student engagement with faculty, peers and course content. This research included an investigation of the importance of faculty–student communication and collaboration; student–student communication and collaboration; active learning techniques; prompt feedback; appropriate time for tasks; high performance expectations; and respect for diverse learning styles (preferences) (Chickering and Ehrmann 1996) to faculty in their online teaching and to alumni in their online learning. The participants were 14 college faculty and 111 alumni, from the same graduate program. A 45-item Likert survey and two open-ended questions were presented to the participants to explore the important factors contributing to their online teaching and learning. The results demonstrated that holding students to high standards of performance, academic honesty and professional conduct was the most important factor to both faculty in their online teaching and alumni in their online learning. Additionally, alumni valued engagement with their faculty more than engagement with other students or course content. Students need an online instructor who is organised and communicative in the online classroom, and faculty need a solidly designed online classroom, with engaged students who are timely in their work. An analysis of the findings with specific application to online teaching and learning is presented in this article.
Agar, M. (1996) Speaking of Ethnography, 2nd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Bali, M. (2014) ‘MOOC Pedagogy: gleaning good practice from existing MOOC’s’, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 10, no 4, pp. 44–56.
Bacchus, R., et al. (2019) ‘When rubrics aren’t enough: exploring exemplars and student rubric co-construction’, Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1080/15505170.2019.1627617
Bangert, A. W. (2004) ‘The Seven Principles of Good Practice: a framework for evaluating on-line teaching’, Internet and Higher Education, vol. 7, pp. 217–232. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.003
Berge, Z. L. (2002) ‘Active, interactive, and reflective eLearning’, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 181–190. ISSN 1528–3518.
Berry, G. R. & Hughes, H. (2019) ‘Integrating work–life balance with 24/7 information and communication technologies: the experience of adult’, American Journal of Distance Education, pp. 1–16. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2020.1701301
Bolliger, D. U. & Des Armier, D. (2013) ‘Active learning in the online environment: the integration of student-generated audio files’, Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 201–211. doi: 10.1177/1469787413498032
Bolliger, D. U. & Martin, F. (2018) ‘Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies’, Distance Education, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 568–583. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041
Çakýroðlu, H. (2014) ‘Evaluating students’ perspectives about virtual classrooms with regard to seven principles of good practice’, South African Journal of Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.15700/201412071201
Chickering, A. W. & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996, October) ‘Implementing the seven principles: technology as lever’, AAHE Bulletin, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 3–6.
Chickering, A. W. & Gamson, Z. F. (1987) ‘Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education’, AAHE Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 3–7.
Craig, R. (2015, August 4) ‘The 3 instructional shifts that will redefine the college professor’, EdSurge. Available at: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2015-08-04-the-3-instructional-shifts-that-will-redefine-the-college-professor
Dahalan, N., et al., (2013) ‘Engaging students online: does gender matter in adoption of learning material design?’, World Journal on Educational Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 413–419. Available at: http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/371/pdf_224
Fink, L. D. (2013) Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Fish, W. W. & Wickersham, L. E. (2009) ‘Best practices for online instructors: reminders’, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 279–284. ISSN 1528-3518.
Gallien, T. & Oomen-Early, J. (2008) ‘Personalized versus collective instructor feedback in the online classroom: does type of feedback affect student satisfaction, academic performance and perceived connectedness with the instructor?’, International Journal on eLearning, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 463–476. ISSN 1537–2456.
Gedik, N., Kiraz, E. & Ozden, M. Y. (2013) ‘Design of a blended learning environment: considerations and implementation issues’,. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 29, no. 1. pp. 1–19. doi: 10.14742/ajet.6
Glaser, B. G. (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
Hair, J., et al., (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Hathaway, K. L. (2014) ‘An application of the seven principles of good practice to online courses’, Research in Higher Education Courses, vol. 22, pp. 1–12.
Hewson, E. R. F. (2018) ‘Students’ emotional engagement, motivation and behaviour over the life of an online course: reflections on two market research case studies’, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.5334/jime.472
Hove, M. C. & Corcoran, K. J. (2008) ‘If you post it, will they come? Lecture availability in introductory psychology’, Teaching of Psychology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 91–95. doi: 10.1080/00986280802004560
Johnson, S. (2014) ‘Applying the seven principles of good practice: technology as a lever – in an online research course’, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 41–50. ISSN 1541–4914.
Jones, C. T., et al., (2009) ‘Development and implementation of a distance-learning certificate program in clinical research management at international sites’, Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–16.
Lee, J. (2014) ‘An exploratory study of effective online learning: assessing satisfaction levels of graduate students of mathematics education associated with human and design factors of an online course’, International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, vol. 15, no. 1. pp. 1–23. Available at: http://facultyecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/APLeePDF.pdf
Leedy, P. & Ormrod, J. (2019) Practical Research: Planning and Design, 12th edn, Pearson, San Francisco, CA.
Lewis, C. C. & Abdul-Hamid, H. (26, May 2006) ‘Implementing effective online teaching practices: voices of exemplary faculty’, Innovative Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 83–98. doi: 10.1007/s10755-006-9010-z
Magnussen, L. (2008) ‘Applying the principles of significant learning in the e-learning environment’, Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 82–86. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20080201-03
Martin, F. & Bolliger, D. U. (2018) ‘Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment’, Online Learning, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 205–222. doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Mayne, L. A. & Wu, Q. (2011) ‘Creating and measuring social presence in online graduate nursing courses’, Nursing Education Perspectives, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 110–114. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.110
Moore, M. J. (1993) ‘Three types of interaction’, in Distance Education: New Perspectives, eds K. Harry, M. John & D. Keegan, Routledge, New York, pp. 19–24.
Moore, M. G. (1997) ‘Theory of transactional distance’, in Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, eds D. Keegan, Routledge, New York, pp. 22–38.
Morris, C. & Chikwa, G. (2016) ‘Audio versus written feedback: exploring learners’ preference and the impact of feedback format on students’ academic performance’, Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 125–137. doi: 10.1177/1469787416637482
Morrison, D. (2015, Sept 2) Four-Step Strategy to Create Active Learning in Any Learning Space – Online, F2F or Blended, Online Learning Insights. Available at: https://onlinelearninginsights.wordpress.com/2015/09/02/four-step-strategy-to-create-active-learning-in-any-learning-space-online-f2f-or-blended/
Pallof, R. M. & Pratt, K. (2007) Building Online Learning Communities, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Plante, K. & Asselin, M. E. (2014) ‘Best practices for creating social presence and caring behaviors online’, Nursing Education Perspectives, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 219–223. doi: 10.5480/13-1094.1
Sato, T. & Haegele, J. A. (2018) ‘Physical educators’ engagement in online adapted physical education graduate professional development’, Professional Development in Education, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 272–286. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2017.1288651
Schwiebert, C. (2012) The 7 Principles of Online Learning. Are They Still Valid? Available at: http://northweststate.edu/wp-content/uploads/files/cschwiebert-7POnline.pdf
Serdyukova1, N. & Serdyukov, P. (2013) ‘Student autonomy in online learning’, 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU-2013), pp. 229–233. doi: 10.5220/0004353102290233. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/db95/634e8f5ded63618d6d15c92a3088893902d4.pdf
Silva, E. (2013, May 28) The Carnegie Unit – Revisited. Available at: https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/blog/the-carnegie-unit-revisited/
Sitzman, K. & Leners, D. W. (2006) ‘Student perceptions of caring in online baccalaureate education’, Nursing Education Perspectives, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 254–259. doi: 10.1043/1536-5026(2006)27[254:SPOCIO]2.0.CO;2
Stone, C., et al., (2016) ‘Opportunity through online learning: experiences of first-in-family students in online open-entry higher education’, Australian Journal of Adult Learning, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 146–169.
White, L. N., Brown, C. A. & Sugar, W. (2007) ‘One department’s transition to online instruction: library science and instructional technology Masters programs at east Carolina University’, TechTrends, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 52–58.
Winkler-Prins, A., et al., (2007) ‘Developing online geography courses: experiences from Michigan State University’, Journal of Geography, vol. 106, pp. 163–170. doi: 10.1080/00221340701677950
Young, S. (2006) ‘Student views of effective online teaching in Higher Education’, The American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 65–77. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.