A comparative study on the traditional and intensive delivery of an online course: design and facilitation recommendations
In this paper, we present findings from a comparative study on a fully online postgraduate course offered in traditional (i.e. 13-week academic session) and intensive (i.e. 6-week academic session) delivery formats. Keeping the course curriculum, structure and quality consistent in both delivery modes, the study investigated student participation and academic performance given different facilitation techniques applied to the discussion forums. Using data from the learning management system and students’ final marks, we conducted quantitative and qualitative analysis and found no difference in the academic performance of students in both courses; however, there was a statistically significant relationship between student participation and academic performance in the intensive delivery format but not in the traditional delivery format. We also found differences in the type of interactions in the different delivery formats. Two key takeaways emerge from our study. Firstly, intensive online courses can be as effective as traditional courses in terms of achievement of learning outcomes with variations in learning design, in this case, the facilitation approach used. Secondly, considering the level and nature of interactions, student-centred discussion forums that allow students to assume different roles work well in the intensive delivery format especially in open discussions. These are important findings for academics and practitioners who wish to offer intensive courses without compromising on course quality and student success.
Anastasi, J. S. (2007) ‘Full-semester and abbreviated summer courses: an evaluation of student performance’, Teaching Psychology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/009862830703400103
Aviv, R., Erlich, Z. & Ravid, G. (2005) ‘Reciprocity analysis of online learning networks’, Journal for Asynchronous Learning, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3–13.
Baran, E. & Correia, A. (2009) ‘Student-led facilitation strategies in online discussions’, Distance Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910903236510
Bedford, L. (2011) ‘The adjunct’s role in delivering quality online instruction’, in Cases on Innovations in Educational Marketing: Transnational and Technological Strategies, eds P. Tripathi & S. Mukerji, IGI Global, Hershey, PA. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-599-5.ch004
Chao, E. L., DeRocco, E. S. & Flynn, M. K. (2009) Adult Learners in Higher Education; Barriers to Success and Strategies to Improve Results, U.S. Department of Labour, Washington, DC.
Chen, S. (2007) ‘Instructional design strategies for intensive online courses: an objectivist-constructivist blended approach’, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 72–86.
Cohen, J. (1960) ‘A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales’, Educational and Psychology Measurement, vol. 20, pp. 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Daniel, E. L. (2000) ‘A review of time-shortened courses across disciplines’, College Student Journal, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 298–308.
Davies, M. (2006) ‘Intensive teaching formats: a review’, Issues in Educational Research, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–20.
Ellis, B. & Sawyer, J. (2009) ‘Regional summer schools: widening learning opportunities through intensive courses’, Education in Rural Australia, vol. 19, pp. 35–52, [online] Available at: http://www.spera.asn.au/
Ferguson, J. M. & DeFelice, A. E. (2010) ‘Length of online course and student satisfaction, perceived learning, and academic performance’, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 73–84. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i2.772
Fidalgo, P. & Thormann, J. (2012) ‘A social network analysis comparison of an experienced and a novice instructor in online teaching’, European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, vol. 1, pp. 1–15.
Gao, Q. (2013) ‘Effects of online course length on undergraduate student performance’, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 25–34.
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The Theory of Affordances. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
Grady, J. R. (2013) ‘Improving student satisfaction with large-scale, compressed timeline online courses’, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 195–208.
Hall, M. V., Wilson, L. A. & Sanger, M. J. (2012) ‘Student success in intensive versus traditional introductory chemistry courses’, Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 1109–1113. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100535d
Harasim, L. M. (1990) ‘Online education: an environment for collaboration and intellectual amplification’, in Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment, eds L. M. Harasim, Praeger, New York, pp. 39–64.
Harwood, K. J., et al., (2018) ‘Comparing student outcomes in traditional vs intensive, online graduate programs in health professional education’, BMC Medical Education, vol. 18, no. 240, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1343-7
Howell-Richardson, C. & Mellar, H. (1996) ‘A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses’, Instructional Science, vol. 24, pp. 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156003
Jan, S. K. (2018) ‘Identifying online communities of inquiry in higher education using social network analysis’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 26, pp. 231–241. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2064
Jan, S. K. & Vlachopoulos, P. (2018) ‘Influence of learning design on the formation of online communities of learning’, International Review of Research on Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1–16.
Kretovics, M. A., Crowe, A. R. & Hyun, E. (2005) ‘A study of faculty perceptions of summer compressed course teaching’, Innovative Higher Education, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-005-3295-1
Kuiper, A., Solomonides, I. & Hardy, L. (2015) ‘Time on task in intensive modes of delivery’, Distance Education, vol. 36, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1055058
Lovett, M., Meyer, O. & Thille, C. (2008) ‘The open learning initiative: measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning’, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, [online] Available at: http://oli.cmu.edu/wp-oli/wpcontent/uploads/2012/05/Lovett_2008_Statistics_Accelerated_Learning_Study .pdf. https://doi.org/10.5334/2008-14
McDonald, J. (2003) ‘Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product’, Computers & Education, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00168-9
Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (2007) Building Online Learning Communities: Effective Strategies for the Virtual Classroom, eds R. M. Palloff & K. Pratt, 2nd edn., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Salmon, G. (2000). E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online, London: Kogan Page.
Scott, P. (2003) ‘Attributes of high-quality intensive courses’, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, vol. 97, pp. 29–38.
Scott, P. A. & Conrad, C. F. (1992) ‘A critique of intensive courses and an agenda for research’, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 8, pp. 411–459.
Tsiotakis, P. & Jimoyiannis, A. (2016) ‘Critical factors towards analysing teachers’ presence in on-line learning communities’, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 28, pp. 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.09.002
Vlachopoulos, P. (2012) ‘The importance of power dynamics in the development of asynchronous online learning communities’, in Proceedings of ASCILITE – Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2012, eds M. Brown, M. Hartnett & T. Stewart, Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, [online] Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/42718/
Vlachopoulos, P. & Cowan, J. (2010a) ‘Choices of approaches in e-moderation: conclusions from a grounded theory study’, Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379684
Vlachopoulos, P. & Cowan, J. (2010b) ‘Reconceptualising moderation in asynchronous online discussions using grounded theory’, Distance Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587911003724611
Wlodkowski, R. J. (2008) Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn: Comprehensive Guide for Teaching All Adults, 3rd edn., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Wlodkowski, R. J. & Ginsberg, M. B. (2010) Teaching Intensive and Accelerated Courses: Instruction that Motivates Learning, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Yang, C.-C., et al., (2006) ‘Exploring the relationships between students’ academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments’, Internet and Higher Education, vol. 9, pp. 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.002
Yang, J. C., et al., (2016) ‘Effects of online presence on learning performance in blog-based online course’, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 30, pp. 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.04.002
Zhao, H. & Sullivan, K. P. (2017) ‘Teaching presence in computer conferencing learning environments: Effects on interaction, cognition and learning uptake’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 538–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12383
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.