Use of the game-based learning platform KAHOOT! to facilitate learner engagement in Animal Science students

  • Kristie E. Cameron School of Environmental and Animal Sciences, Unitec Institute of Technology
  • Lewis A. Bizo School of Psychology, University of New England
Keywords: ‘KAHOOT!’, gamification, online-learning tool, engagement, tertiary, learning, enjoyment

Abstract

Gamification of instructional activities is a useful approach that educators can use to promote more effective learning environments by increasing problem-solving, critical thinking and competence in the classroom. ‘KAHOOT!’ is an online multi-player real-time quiz game that allows students to measure learning in an engaging, immediate and entertaining manner. Lecturers can measure how well students absorb information and tailor their teaching to the next step or re-teach a concept after poor uptake by students. Seventy-two students participated in a 20-question survey about their experiences with ‘KAHOOT!’. Engagement scores were correlated with assessment grades to measure if ‘KAHOOT!’ affected student learning and achievement. The survey was deemed statistically sound in reliability and validity testing, and a principal components analysis (PCA) revealed that the attributes were strongly linked. There was no relationship between engagement score and assessment grade, indicating that ‘KAHOOT’!’ did not directly increase achievement. However, assessment of individual responses identified that students found it to be a positive social learning technology as it provided a fun, competitive and immersive end to a class. The benefits of fostering engagement, enjoyment and immersion within adult learning are especially important for maintaining a level of achievement within education to ensure that students are better equipped to deal with challenges and can turn a potential failure into an opportunity to improve their scholarship. The challenge provided by this study is to identify now how to measure the value of ‘fun’ activities in the tertiary classroom as a reinforcer for engagement, participation and learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


Bicen, H. & Kocakoyun, S. (2017) ‘Educational Technology: Current Issues’, World Journal on Educational Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18–23. Retrieved from http://dergipark.org.tr/itej/issue/39211/461500


Byrne-Davis, L., et al., (2015) ‘Just-in-time research: A call to arms for research into mobile technologies in higher education’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 23, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328


Cochran, C. & Brown, S. (2016) ‘Andragogy and the Adult Learner’. In Flores, K.A., Kirstein, K. D., Schieber, C. E., & Olswang, S. G. (Eds). Supporting the Success of Adult and Online Students. Washington, USA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, pp. 73–84


Cutri, R. P. E., et al., (2016) ‘Kahoot, a new and cheap way to get classroom-response instead of using clickers’. In ASEE’s 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA. #14649. June 26-29, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/64/papers/14649/view


Davis, M. H. & McPartland, J. M. (2012) ‘High school reform and student engagement’, in Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., and Wylie, C. (eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer, pp. 515–539.


Dellos, R. (2015) ‘‘KAHOOT!’ A digital game resource for learning’, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, vol. 12 no. 4, pp. 49–52. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Apr_15/Apr15.pdf


Dempsey, J. V., Haynes, L. L., Lucassen, B. A. and Casey, M. S. (2002) ‘Forty simple computer games and what they could mean to educators’, Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 33, pp. 157–168. Retrieved from www.savie.ca/SAGE/Articles/100013_013-Dempsey-2002.pdf


Fotaris, P., Mastoras, T., Leinfellner, R. and Yasmine, R. (2015) From hiscore to high marks: Empirical study of teaching programming through gamification. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Games Based Learning ECGBL 2015, Steinkjer, Norway, 8-9 October 2015. Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/28599


Hakulinen, L. & Auvinen, T. (2014) ‘The effect of gamification on students with different achievement goal orientations’. In The Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE) Proceedings, Kuching, Malaysia in April 2014. doi: 10.1109/LaTiCE.2014.10


Icard, B. (2014) ‘Educational technology best practices’, International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 37–42. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Mar_14/Mar14.pdf


Ismail, M. A.-A. & Mohammad, J. A.-M. (2017) ‘Kahoot: A Promising Tool for Formative Assessment in Medical Education’, Education in Medicine Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 19–26. doi: 10.21315/eimj2017.9.2.2


KAHOOT!’ (2015) ‘KAHOOT!’ is One of the World’s Fastest Growing Learning Brands. Accessed at https://support.kahoot.com/hc/en-us/categories/115000091647-About-Kahoot


Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02291575


Karaaslan, I. A. & Budak, L. (2012) ‘Research on the use of mobile phone features by university students and its impact on their communication practices in everyday life.’ Journal of Yasar University, vol. 26, pp. 4548–4525.


Koster, R. (2005) A theory of fun for game design. Scottsdale, AZ: Paragylph Press.


Malone, T.W. (1980) ‘What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games’, Technical report, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, California.


Malone, T. & Lepper (1987). Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning. In Snow, R. & Farr, M. J. (Eds), Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction Volume 3: Conative and Affective Process Analyses. Hillsdale, NJ. (pp 223-253).


Mark, S. F. (1983) ‘To succeed or not to succeed: A critical review of issues in learned helplessness.’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, pp. 1–19. doi: 16/0361-476X(83)90030-9


Moreno-Ger, P., Burgos, D. & Torrente, J. (2009) ‘Digital games in eLearning environments: Current uses and emerging trends.’, Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 40, pp. 669–687. doi: 10.1177/1046878109340294


Özer, H. H. & Bicen, H. (2017) ‘The Effect of Gamified Learning Environment on Student Success’, International Journal of Scientific Study, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 108–113. doi: 10.1108/IJILT-02-2017-0009


Prensky, M. (2001) Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw Hill.


Ren, C. & Wagner, J. (2016) ‘‘KAHOOT!’, The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language August, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej78/m1.pdf


Simoes, J., Redondo, R. D. & Vilas, A. F. (2003) ‘A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform.’, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 2, pp 345–353. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.007


Wang, A. I., Zhu, M. & Saetre, R. (2016) ‘The effect of digitizing and gamifying quizzing in classrooms’, In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Games Based Learning, Paisley, UK, pp. 729–737. Available at: https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2426374


Whitton, N. (2007) An investigation into the potential of collaborative computer game-based learning in higher education. Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland.


Whitton, N. (2011) ‘Game engagement theory and adult learning’, Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 596–609. doi: 10.1177/1046878110378587
Published
2019-05-15
How to Cite
Cameron, K., & Bizo, L. (2019). Use of the game-based learning platform KAHOOT! to facilitate learner engagement in Animal Science students. Research in Learning Technology, 27. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2225
Section
Original Research Articles