Analysing construction student experiences of mobile mixed reality enhanced learning in virtual and augmented reality environments
Mixed reality (MR) and mobile visualisation methods have been identified as important technologies that could reimagine spatial information delivery and enhance higher education practice. However, there is limited research on the impact of mobile MR (MMR) within construction education and improvement of the learners’ experience. With new building information modelling (BIM) workflows being adopted within the architecture, engineering and construction industry, innovative MMR pedagogical delivery methods should be explored to enhance this information-rich spatial technology workflow. This paper outlines qualitative results derived through thematic analysis of learner reflections from two technology-enhanced lessons involving a lecture and a hands-on workshop focussed on MMR-BIM delivered within postgraduate construction education. Seventy participants across the two lessons recruited from an Australian university participated to answer the research question: ‘Does applied mobile mixed reality create an enhanced learning environment for students?’ The results of the analysis suggest that using MMR-BIM can result in an enhanced learning environment that facilitates unique learning experiences, engagement and motivation. However, the study outcome suggests that to understand the processes leading to these learning aspects, further empirical research on the topic is required.
This paper is part of the special collection Mobile Mixed Reality Enhanced Learning edited by Thom Cochrane, James Birt, Helen Farley, Vickel Narayan and Fiona Smart. More papers from this collection can be found here.
Adria, M. (2019) ‘Reading the grand palimpsest of mixed reality’, Explorations in Media Ecology, vol. 18, no. 1–2, pp. 43–55. doi: 10.1386/eme.18.1-2.43_1.
Aguayo, C., Cochrane, T. & Narayan, V. (2017) ‘Key themes in mobile learning: prospects for learner-generated learning through AR and VR’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 27–40. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3671.
Akçayır, M. & Akçayır, G. (2017) ‘Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: a systematic review of the literature’, Educational Research Review, vol. 20, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002.
Alexander, B., et al., (2019) Horizon Report: Higher Education Edition, EDUCAUSE, Louisville, CO.
Antwi-Afari, M. F., et al., (2018) ‘Critical success factors for implementing building information modelling (BIM): a longitudinal review’, Automation in Construction, vol. 91, pp. 100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.010.
Birt, J. & Cowling, M. (2018) ‘Assessing mobile mixed reality affordances as a comparative visualization pedagogy for design communication’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 26, pp. 1–25. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2128.
Birt, J., Moore, E. & Cowling, M. (2017) ‘Improving paramedic distance education through mobile mixed reality simulation’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 69–83. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3596.
Birt, J., et al., (2018) ‘Mobile mixed reality for experiential learning and simulation in medical and health sciences education’, Information, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 31. doi: 10.3390/info9020031.
Bower, M., et al., (2014) ‘Augmented reality in education – Cases, places and potentials’, Educational Media International, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2014.889400.
Bower, M., Lee, M. J. W. & Dalgarno, B. (2017) ‘Collaborative learning across physical and virtual worlds: factors supporting and constraining learners in a blended reality environment’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 407–430. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12435.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Chan, A. P. C., et al., (2018) ‘Critical review of studies on building information modeling (BIM) in project management’, Frontiers of Engineering Management, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 394–406. doi: 10.15302/j-fem-2018203.
Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2016) E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, 4th edn, Wiley, New Jersey, NJ.
Cochrane, T., Smart, F. & Narayan, V. (2018) ‘Editorial: special issue on mobile mixed reality’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 26, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2195.
Crompton, H. & Burke, D. (2018) ‘The use of mobile learning in higher education: a systematic review’, Computers & Education, vol. 123, pp. 53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007
Dalgarno, B. & Lee, M. J. W. (2010) ‘What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments?’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 10–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x.
Dziuda, Ł., et al., (2014) ‘The effects of simulated fog and motion on simulator sickness in a driving simulator and the duration of after-effects’, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 406–412. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.003.
Fowler, C. (2015) ‘Virtual reality and learning: where is the pedagogy?’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 412–422. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12135.
Gugenheimer, J, et al., (2019) ‘Challenges using head-mounted displays in shared and social spaces’, in Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1145/3290607.3299028.
Jones, C, et al., (2010) ‘Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university?’, Computers & Education, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 722–732. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022.
Kolb, D. A. (2014) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, 2nd edn, Pearson, New Jersey, NY.
Miettinen, R. & Paavola, S. (2014) ‘Beyond the BIM utopia: approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling’, Automation in Construction, vol. 43, pp. 84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.009.
Milgram, P. & Kishino, F. (1994) ‘A taxonomy of mixed reality visual-displays’, Ieice Transactions on Information and Systems, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 1321–1329.
O’Brien, H. L. & Toms, E. G. (2008) ‘What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 938–955. doi: 10.1002/asi.20801.
Parveau, M. & Adda, M. (2018) ‘3iVClass: a new classification method for virtual, augmented and mixed realities’, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 141, pp. 263–270. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.180.
Puolitaival, T. & Forsythe, P. (2016) ‘Practical challenges of BIM education’, International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, vol. 34, no. 4/5, pp. 351–366. doi: 10.1108/SS-12-2015-0053.
Quintero, J, et al., (2019) ‘Augmented reality in educational inclusion. A systematic review on the last decade’, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, no. 1835, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01835.
Sacks, R, et al., (2018) BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, 4th edn, Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Sadler-Smith, E & Smith P. J., (2004) ‘Strategies for accommodating individuals’ styles and preferences in flexible learning programmes’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 395–412. doi: 10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00399.x.
Schott, C & Marshall S., (2018) ‘Virtual reality and situated experiential education: a conceptualization and exploratory trial’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 843–852. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12293.
Speicher, M., Hall, B. D. & Nebeling, M. (2019) ‘What is mixed reality?’, in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300767.
Steed, A., et al., (2016) ‘The impact of a self-avatar on cognitive load in immersive virtual reality’, IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), 19–23 March 2016, pp. 67–76. doi: 10.1109/VR.2016.7504689.
Thompson, P. (2013) ‘The digital natives as learners: technology use patterns and approaches to learning’, Computers & Education, vol. 65, pp. 12–33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022.
Vasilevski, N. & Birt, J. (2019) ‘Towards optimizing place experience using design science research and augmented reality gamification’, in Intersections in Simulation and Gaming: Disruption and Balance. ASC 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Springer, Singapore. pp. 77–92. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9582-7_6.
Vasilevski, N., Brand, J. & Birt, J. (2018) ‘Analysing micro-location beacon gamification: scenarios, types and characteristics’, in Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, ACM, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 484–489. doi: 10.1145/3292147.3292210.
Wylie, R. & Chi, M. T. H. (2014) ‘The self-explanation principle in multi-media learning’, in R. E. Mayer (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp. 413–432.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.