Integration of mobile augmented reality (MAR) applications into biology laboratory: Anatomic structure of the heart
The purpose of the current study is to design and develop a sample Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) application addressing the anatomic structure of the heart in a way suitable for laboratory learning for pre-service science teachers to achieve learning by constructing information in biology instruction. The implementation of the MAR design activity was conducted with the participation of 30 pre-service teachers taking the biology laboratory course. The implementation process of the activity consists of four stages. The first stage includes the introduction of the MAR application program and marker; the second stage includes the use of the MAR application in a laboratory environment; the third stage includes the operation of dissection and the last stage includes the association of the MAR application with the operation of dissection and general evaluation. Then, semi-structured interviews were conducted by involving pre-service teachers and the data obtained from these interviews revealed that integration of heart dissection with MAR application helped the pre-service teachers to better understand the anatomic structure of the heart and the related concepts. Thus, a sample activity demonstrating how MAR, which is an instructional method with strong potential for reification and visualisation, can be integrated into the teaching of concepts in laboratory settings was developed.
Abdüsselam, M. S. (2014) Development and Evaluation of an Instructional Material for Physic Lesson Magnetism Subject Based on Augmented Reality Environment, Ph.D. Dissertation Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University.
Akpınar, E. (2006) Computer Assisted Instruction in Constructing of Abstract Concepts in Science Teaching: The Unit Electricity in Our Life, Ph.D. Dissertation Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University.
Azuma, R. T. (1997) ‘A survey of augmented reality’, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 355–385. doi: 10.1162/pres.1918.104.22.1685
Bahar, M., et al., (2008) ‘Science student teachers’ ideas of the heart’, Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 78–85. http://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1404719630.pdf
Billinghurst, M. & Kato, H. (2002) ‘Collaborative augmented reality’, Communications of the ACM, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 64–70. doi: 10.1145/514236.514265
Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F. K. (2014) ‘A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course’, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 37, pp. 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018
Chen, C. M. & Tsai, Y. N. (2012) ‘Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools’, Computers & Education, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 638–652. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.001
Chen, M. M., Scott, S. M., & Stevens, J. D. (2018) ‘Technology as a tool in teaching quantitative biology at the secondary and undergraduate levels: a review’, Letters in Biomathematics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 30–48. doi: 10.1080/23737867.2017.1413432
Doğan, B. & Ay, T. (2013) ‘Biyolojinin toplum bilim ve teknoloji açısından önemi’, in Biyolojide Özel Konular, 3rd edn., eds F. Polat, Pegem Akademi, Ankara, pp. 2–15.
Dunleavy, M. & Dede, C. (2014) ‘Augmented reality teaching and learning’, in The Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 4th edn., eds J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen & M. J. Bishop, Springer, New York, pp. 735–745.
Elgün, A. & Kaya, S. (2015) ‘The influence of instructional games in science teaching on primary students’ achievement’, Kastamonu Education Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 329–342.
Erbaş, Ç. (2016) The Effects of Mobile Augmented Reality Applications on Students’ Academic Achievement and Motivation, Master Dissertation Thesis, Süleyman Demirel University.
Günüç, S. (2017) Eğitimde Teknoloji Entegrasyonunun Kuramsal Temelleri, 1st edn., Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Gürdal, A., Şahin, F., & Yalçınkaya, T. (2002) ‘Integration on developing the materials of science teaching’, Marmara University Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 16, no. 16, pp. 71–80.
Hsiao, K. F., Chen, N. S., & Huang, S. Y. (2012) ‘Learning while exercising for science education in augmented reality among adolescents’, Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 331–349. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2010.486682
Johnson, L., et al. (2015) NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition, The New Media Consortium, Austin, TX.
Kılıç, D. & Sağlam, N. (2004) ‘The effect of the concept maps on achievement and retention of learning in biology education’, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, vol. 27, pp. 155–164.
Kırılmazkaya, G. & Kırbağ-Zengin, F. (2016) ‘Determination of photosynthesis misconceptions’ through Vee diagrams and preservice teachers’ views towards these tools’, Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1537–1563. doi: 10.17556/jef.70209
Klopfer, E. & Squire, K. (2008) ‘Environmental detectives: the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations’, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 203–228. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6
Köse, S., Ayas, A., & Uşak, M. (2006) ‘The effect of conceptual change texts instructions on overcoming prospective science teachers’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants’, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 78–103.
Küçük, S. (2015) Effects of Learning Anatomy via Mobile Augmented Reality on Medical Students’ Academic Achievement, Cognitive Load, and Views toward Implementation, Ph.D. Dissertation Thesis, Atatürk University.
Lawson, A. (1988) ‘The acquisition of biological knowledge during childhood: cognitive conflict or tabula rasa?’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 25, pp. 185–199. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660250304
Lukin, K. (2013) ‘Exciting middle and high school students about immunology: an easy, inquiry-based lesson’, Immunologic Research, vol. 55, pp. 201–209. doi: 10.1007/s12026-012-8363-x
Özdemir, M. (2017) ‘Experimental studies on learning with augmented reality technology: a systematic review’, Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 609–632. doi: 10.17860/mersinefd.336746
Perez-Lopez, D. & Contero, M. (2013) ‘Delivering educational multimedia contents through an augmented reality application: a case study on its impact on knowledge acquisition and retention’, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 19–28.
Radu, I. (2014) ‘Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis’, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 18, pp. 1533–1543. doi: 10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y
Salmi, H., Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. (2010) ‘Visualising the invisible in science centres and science museums: augmented reality (AR) technology application and science teaching’, in Web-Based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice: Developing Virtual Environments for Social and Pedagogical Advancement, eds N. Karacapilidis, Information Science Reference, New York, NY, pp. 185–208.
Somyürek, S. (2014) ‘Öğretim sürecinde Z kuşağının dikkatini çekme: Artırılmış gerçeklik’, Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 63–80. doi: 10.17943/etku.88319
Sumadio, D. D. & Rambli, D. R. A. (2010) ‘Preliminary evaluation on user acceptance of the augmented reality use for education’, Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications, Bali Island, Indonesia, pp. 461–465.
Wojciechowski, R. & Cellary, W. (2013) ‘Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments’, Computers & Education, vol. 68, pp. 570–585. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014
Wu, H. K., et al., (2013) ‘Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education’, Computers & Education, vol. 62, pp. 41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
Yeşilyurt, S. & Gül, Ş. (2012) ‘Secondary school students’ misconceptions about the “transportation and circulatory systems” unit’, Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–48.
Yıldırım, S. (2016) The Impact of Augmented Reality to Student's Success, Motivation, and their Perception and Behavior Related to Problem Solving Abilities in Science Classes, Ph.D. Dissertation Thesis, Ankara University.
Yılmaz, Z. A. & Batdı, V. (2016) ‘A meta-analytic and thematic comparative analysis of the integration of augmented reality applications into education’, Education and Science, vol. 41, no. 188, pp. 273–289. doi: 10.15390/EB.2016.6707
Yip, D. Y. (2010) ‘Teachers’ misconceptions of the circulatory system’, Journal of Biological Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 207–215. doi: 10.1080/00219266.1998.9655622
Zachary, W., et al., (1997) ‘The use of executable cognitive models in simulation-based intelligent embedded training’, Proceedings of Human Factors Society 41st Annual Meeting, Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp. 1118–1122.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.