MESH360: a framework for designing MMR-enhanced clinical simulations

  • Thomas Cochrane Centre for Learning and Teaching, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-6118
  • Stephen Aiello Paramedicine, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Stuart Cook Garden City Aviation, Nelson, New Zealand
  • Claudio Aguayo Centre for Learning and Teaching, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Norm Wilkinson Paramedicine, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
Keywords: immersive reality, biometrics, design-based research, critical care health education

Abstract

This article evaluates the results of two prototype iterations of a design-based research project that explores the application of mobile mixed reality (MMR) to enhance critical care clinical health education simulation in Paramedicine. The project utilises MMR to introduce critical elements of patient and practitioner risk and stress into clinical simulation learning scenarios to create more authentic learning environments. Subjective participant feedback is triangulated against participant biometric data to validate the level of participant stress introduced to clinical simulation through the addition of MMR. Results show a positive impact on the learning experience for both novice and professional paramedic practitioners. The article highlights the development of implementation and data triangulation methodologies that can be utilised to enhance wider clinical simulation contexts than the original context of Paramedicine education. We argue that our collaborative transdisciplinary design team model provides a transferable framework for designing MMR-enhanced clinical simulation environments.

This article is part of the special collection Mobile Mixed Reality Enhanced Learning edited by Thom Cochrane, James Birt, Helen Farley, Vickel Narayan and Fiona Smart. More papers from this collection can be found here.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


Aguayo, C., Cochrane, T. & Narayan, V. (2017) ‘Key themes in mobile learning: prospects for learner-generated learning through AR and VR’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 33, pp. 27–40. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3671


Aguayo, C., et al., (2018) ‘Embodied reports in paramedicine mixed reality learning’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 26. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2150


Bannan, B., Cook, J. & Pachler, N. (2015) ‘Reconceptualizing design research in the age of mobile learning’, Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 24, pp. 1–16. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1018911


Barr, N. & Foster, J.-A. (2017) ‘Using consensus group methods to improve simulation using immersive media in paramedicine’, Journal of Paramedic Practice, vol. 9, pp. 121–125. doi: 10.12968/jpar.2017.9.3.121


Birt, J., Moore, E. & Cowling, M. (2017) ‘Improving paramedic distance education through mobile mixed reality simulation’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), vol. 33, pp. 69–83. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3596


Blaschke, L. & Hase, S. (2015) ‘Heutagogy, technology, and lifelong learning for professional and part-time learners’, in Transformative Perspectives and Processes in Higher Education, eds A. Dailey-Hebert & K. S. Dennis, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp. 75–94.


Blaschke, L. M. & Hase, S. (2019) ‘Heutagogy and digital media networks: setting students on the path to lifelong learning’, Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 1, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.24135/pjtel.v1i1.1


Burden, K. & Kearney, M. (2016) ‘Conceptualising authentic mobile learning’, in Mobile Learning Design: Theories and Application, eds D. Churchill, J. Lu, K. F. T. Chiu & B. Fox, Springer, Singapore. pp. 27–42. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_2


Cochrane, T. (2013a) ‘Mlearning as a catalyst for pedagogical change’, in Handbook of Mobile Learning, eds Z. Berge & L. Muilenburg, Routledge, New York, pp. 247–258. doi: 10.4324/9780203118764.ch22


Cochrane, T. (2013b) ‘A summary and critique of mlearning research and practice’, in Z. Berge & L. Muilenburg, Handbook of Mobile Learning, Routledge, New York, pp. 24–34.


Cochrane, T. (2014) ‘Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 45, pp. 65–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01384.x


Cochrane, T., et al., (2019) ‘Developing a mobile immersive reality framework for enhanced simulation training: MESH360’, in ASCILITE 2019: 36th International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education, eds S. C. Y. Wei, C. K. Mun & A. Alphonso, 2–5 December 2019, ASCILITE, Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS), Singapore, pp. 389–394.


Cochrane, T., et al., (2018a) ‘Designing immersive mobile learning mixed reality for paramedic education’, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), IEEE, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia, pp. 80–85.


Cochrane, T., et al., (2017) ‘A DBR framework for designing mobile virtual reality learning environments’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), 33, 54–68. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3613


Cochrane, T., et al., (2016) ‘Designing virtual reality environments for paramedic education: MESH360’, in Show Me The Learning. Proceedings ASCILITE 2016 Adelaide, eds S. Barker, S. Dawson, A. Pardo & C. Colvin, 28–30 November 2016, Ascilite, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 125–135.


Cochrane, T. & Narayan, V. (2014) ‘Cultivating creative approaches to learning’, in Experiences in Self-Determined Learning, eds L. M. Blaschke, C. Kenyon & S. Hase (eds.), CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, pp. 149–170.


Cochrane, T. & Narayan, V. (2016) ‘Principles of modeling COPs for pedagogical change: lessons learnt from practice 2006 to 2014’, in Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher Education: Dreamers and Schemers, eds J. Mcdonald & A. Cater-Steel, Springer, Singapore, pp. 619–643.


Cochrane, T. & Narayan, V. (2017) ‘Design considerations for mobile learning’, in Instructional-Design Theories and Models, eds C. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty & R. Myers, Routledge, New York.


Cochrane, T., et al., (2018b) ‘Authentic interprofessional health education scenarios using mobile VR’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 26, p. 2130. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2130


Cook, J. & Santos, P. (2016) ‘Three phases of mobile learning state of the art and case of mobile help seeking tool for the health care sector’, in Mobile Learning Design, eds D. Churchill, J. Lu, T. K. F. Chiu & B. Fox, Springer, Singapore, pp. 315–333. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_19


Dall’alba, G. & Barnacle, R. (2007) ‘An ontological turn for higher education’, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 32, pp. 679–691. doi: 10.1080/03075070701685130


Eames, C. & Aguayo, C. (2019) Using Mobile Learning in Free-Choice Educational Settings to Enhance Ecological Literacy [Online], Teaching and Learning Research Initiative, Available at: http://www.tlri.org.nz/tlri-research/research-progress/cross-sector/using-mobile-learning-free-choice-educational-settings.


Edgerton, J. (2019) ‘Wearable technology and intermittent health care monitoring: the wave is here, the tsunami is coming’, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 157, pp. 244–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.07.060


Foster, J.-A. (2017) ACODE Award 2017 [Online], University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia. Available at: https://youtu.be/r16K8WCHZhM


Hase, S. (2014) ‘An introduction to self-determined learning (Heutagogy)’, in Experiences in Self-Determined Learning, eds L. M. Blaschke, C. Kenyon & S. Hase, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Seattle, pp. 1–9.


Hase, S. & Kenyon, C. (2007) ‘Heutagogy: a child of complexity theory’, Complicity: an International Journal of Complexity and Education, vol. 4, pp. 111–118. doi: 10.29173/cmplct8766


Hellhammer, D. H., Wüst, S. & Kudielka, B. M. (2009) ‘Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research’, Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 34, pp. 163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.026


Kaufman, D. (2010) ‘Simulation in health professional education’, in Educational Gameplay and Simulation Environments: Case Studies and Lessons Learned, eds D. Kaufman & L. Sauvé, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA, pp. 51–67. doi: 10.4018/978-1-61520-731-2.ch003


Kearney, M., et al., (2012) ‘Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 20, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14406


Laschinger, S., et al., (2008) ‘Effectiveness of simulation on health profession students' knowledge, skills, confidence and satisfaction’, International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, vol. 6, pp. 278–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00108.x


Leonard, S. & Fitzgerald, R. (2018) ‘Holographic learning: a mixed reality trial of Microsoft HoloLens in an Australian secondary school’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 26.


Luckin, R. (2008) ‘The learner centric ecology of resources: a framework for using technology to scaffold learning’, Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 449–462. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.018


Mckenney, S. & Reeves, T. (2019) Conducting educational design research, Routledge, London.


Milgram, P. & Kishino, F. (1994) ‘A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays’, IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, vol. 77, pp. 1321–1329. https://search.ieice.org/bin/summary.php?id=e77-d_12_1321


Ming-Zher, P., Swenson, N. C. & Picard, R. W. (2010) ‘A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity’, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 57, pp. 1243–1252. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2038487


Muhanna, M. A. (2015) ‘Virtual reality and the CAVE: taxonomy, interaction challenges and research directions’, Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 27, pp. 344–361. doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2014.03.023


Narayan, V., Herrington, J. & Cochrane, T. (2019) ‘Design principles for heutagogic learning: implementing student-determined learning with mobile and social media tools’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), vol. 35. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3941


OECD. (2015) Students, Computers and Learning, OECD Publishing, Paris, Pisa.


Porter, W. W. & Graham, C. R. (2016) ‘Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 47, pp. 748–762. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12269


Reeves, T., Herrington, J. & Oliver, R. (2005) ‘Design research: a socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education’, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 16, pp. 97–116. doi: 10.1007/BF02961476


Stretton, T., Cochrane, T. & Narayan, V. (2018) ‘Exploring mobile mixed reality in healthcare higher education: a systematic review’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 26, p. 2131. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2131


Tobias, S. & Duffy, T. (eds.) (2009) Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure?, Routledge, London.


Vasilevski, N. & Birt, J. (2019) ‘Analysing construction student experiences of mobile mixed reality enhanced learning in virtual and augmented reality environments’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 27. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v28.2329
Published
2020-02-13
How to Cite
Cochrane, T., Aiello, S., Cook, S., Aguayo, C., & Wilkinson, N. (2020). MESH360: a framework for designing MMR-enhanced clinical simulations. Research in Learning Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2357
Section
Mobile Mixed Reality - Themed Collection