Performance, behaviour and perceptions of an open educational resource-derived interactive educational resource by online and campus university students
Platforms are now becoming available to allow for incorporating interactive elements into open educational resources (OERs), but little has been published about their use and effectiveness. Students enrolled in online and on-campus sections of an intermediate human nutrition course at a public Midwestern University in the United States used an OER that was adapted to an online platform, where it included embedded videos and summative assessments (interactive educational resource). Data were collected from the learning management system, course performance, resource platform and a survey. Student course grades were positively correlated with use of the interactive educational resource and percentage of questions correctly answered. Overall survey response rate was 84/109 (77.1%). Student respondents reported higher use of the interactive educational resource and preferred it over a static PDF or hard copy. Students were most motivated to utilise the interactive educational resource by the opportunity to earn extra credit followed by desire to earn a good grade. Student respondents reported that they were satisfied with their experiences using the interactive educational resource, and with a high likelihood, would recommend future students to use it. While these findings are limited to one semester at one university, they support future research efforts into the efficacy of interactive educational resources and OER-enabled pedagogy.
Ackerman, D. S. & Gross, B. L. (2005) ‘My instructor made me do it: task characteristics of procrastination’, Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 5–13. doi: 10.1177/0273475304273842
Akbar, M. (2016) ‘Digital technology shaping teaching practices in higher education’, Frontiers in ICT, vol. 3, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.3389/fict.2016.00001
Bushway, S. D. & Flower, S. M. (2002) ‘Helping criminal justice students learn statistics: a quasi-experimental evaluation of learning assistance’, International Journal of Phytoremediation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 35–56. doi: 10.1080/10511250200085321
Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D. & Guidry, K. R. (2010) ‘Engaging online learners: the impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement’, Computers and Education, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1222–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Chu, A. H. C. & Choi, J. N. (2005) ‘Rethinking procrastination: positive effects of “active” procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance’, Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 245–264. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.145.3.245-264
Clinton, V. (2019) ‘Reading from paper compared to screens: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Journal of Research in Reading, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 288–325. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12269
Clinton, V. & Khan, S. (2019) ‘Efficacy of open textbook adoption on learning performance and course withdrawal rates: a meta-analysis’, AERA Open, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1177/2332858419872212
Clinton, V., Legerski, E. & Rhodes, B. (2019) ‘Comparing student learning from and perceptions of open and commercial textbook excerpts: a randomized experiment’, Frontiers in Education, vol. 4, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00110
Colvard, N. B., Watson, C. E. & Park, H. (2018) ‘The impact of open educational resources on various student success metrics’, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 262–276.
Daniel, D. B. & Woody, W. D. (2013) ‘E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts’, Computers and Education, vol. 62, pp. 18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.016
Delimont, N., Turtle, E. C., Bennett, A., Adhikari, K., & Lindshield, B. L. L. (2016) ‘University students and faculty have positive perceptions of open/ alternative resources and their utilization in a textbook replacement initiative’. Research in Learning Technology, vol. 24. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v24.29920
Edgcomb, A et al. (2014) Student Performance Improvement using Interactive Textbooks: A Three-University Cross-Semester Analysis. Available at: http://static.cs.ucr.edu/store/techreports/UCR-CSE-2014-10030.pdf
Edgcomb, A et al. (2015) Student Usage and Behavioral Patterns with Online Interactive Textbook Materials. Available at: http://alumni.cs.ucr.edu/~aedgcomb/papers/ICERI15_StudentUsageandBehavioralPatternswithOnlineInteractiveTextbookMaterials.pdf
Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A. & Fawzi, H. (2018) ‘Using technology for formative assessment to improve students’ learning’, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology –TOJET, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 182–188.
Feldstein, Aet al. (2012) ‘Open textbooks and increased student access and outcomes’, European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, vol. 15, no. 2. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ992490
Haber, J. & Sarkar, N. (2017) ‘Sensitivity analysis of extra credit assignments’, Universal Journal of Management, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 291–300. doi: 10.13189/ujm.2017.050604
Harrison, M. A., Meister, D. G. & Lefevre, A. J. (2011) ‘Which students complete extra-credit work’, College Student Journal, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 550–555.
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R. & Graham, C. R. (2015) ’Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: a review’, Computers and Education, no. 90, pp. 36–53. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
Holmes, N. (2018) ‘Engaging with assessment: increasing student engagement through continuous assessment’, Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 23–34. doi: 10.1177/1469787417723230
Inside Higher Ed. (2019) Textbook Trade-Offs. Available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/07/26/students-sacrifice-meals-and-trips-home-pay-textbooks
Kachgal, M. M., Hansen, L. S. & Nutter, K. J. (2001) ’Academic procrastination prevention/intervention: strategies and recommendations’, Journal of Developmental Education, vol. 25, Fall, no. 1, pp. 14–24.
Liberatore, M. W. (2017) ‘High textbook reading rates when using an interactive textbook for a material and energy balances course’, Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 109–118.
Lim, W. N. (2017) ‘Improving student engagement in higher education through mobile-based interactive teaching model using socrative’, in IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, pp. 404–412. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942879
Lindshield, B. L., & Adhikari, K. (2011). The Kansas State University Human Nutrition (HN 400) Flexbook. EDUCAUSE Review Online. Available at: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2011/12/the-kansas-state-university-human-nutrition-hn-400-flexbook
Lindshield, B. L., & Adhikari, K. (2013a) ‘Campus and online U.S. college students’ attitudes toward an open educational resource course fee: a pilot study’. International Journal of Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 42–51. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v2n4p42
Lindshield, B. L., & Adhikari, K. (2013b). ‘Online and campus college students like using an open educational resource instead of a traditional textbook’. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 26–38. Available at: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no1/lindshield_0313.htm
Lindshield, B. (2020) Human Nutrition (Lindshield). Available at: https://med.libretexts.org/Courses/Kansas_State_University/Book%3A_Human_Nutrition_(Lindshield)
Michinov, Net al. (2011) ‘Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments’, Computers and Education, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 243–252. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025
Mills, M. S. (2016) ‘A case for authoring multi-touch interactive open educational resources’, TechTrends, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 456–464. doi: 10.1007/s11528-016-0097-5
Myers, C. A. & Hatchel, J. M. (2019) ‘Personality and cognitive factors related to completing extra credit assignments’, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–7.
O’Bannon, B. W., Skolits, G. J. & Lubke, J. K. (2017) ‘The influence of digital interactive textbook instruction on student learning preferences, outcomes, and motivation’, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 49, no. 3–4, pp. 103–116. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2017.1303798
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. Jet al. (2013) ‘Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: a comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning’, Computers and Education, no. 63, pp. 259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022
Sharp, L. A. & Sharp, J. H. (2016) Enhancing student success in online learning experiences through the use of self-regulation strategies. The role of DevOps in IS curriculum view project [online]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304073173
Silva, F. J. & Gross, T. F. (2004) ‘The rich get richer: students’ discounting of hypothetical delayed rewards and real effortful extra credit’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1124–1128. doi: 10.3758/BF03196747
Skinner, D. & Howes, B. (2013) ‘The required textbook friend or foe? Dealing with the dilemma’, Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 133–142. doi: 10.19030/tlc.v10i2.7753
The College Board. (2019) Trends in College Pricing 2019. Available at: www.collegeboard.org
UNESCO. (2019) Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER) [online]. Available at: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=49556&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Viegas, C., Alves, G. & Lima, N. (2015) ‘Formative assessment diversity to foster students engagement’, in Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL 2015, pp. 929–935. doi: 10.1109/ICL.2015.7318152
Wiley, D. (2018) Defining the open in open content and open educational resources [online]. Available at: https://opencontent.org/definition/
Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B. & Baker, C. A. (2010) ‘E-books or textbooks: students prefer textbooks’, Computers and Education, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 945–948. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.