An examination of student preference for traditional didactic or chunking teaching strategies in an online learning environment
This research examined first year undergraduate tertiary student preferences for different online video playback options by comparing a didactic long lecture recording versus a series of topical ‘chunked’ videos of identical learning material in an information literacy unit. Student preference was determined by student unique download choice of streaming video lecture material, cumulative visits and percent completion of viewing of lecture videos. De-identified click-stream data for 1268 university students across two academic years 2016 (n = 647) and 2017 (n = 621) were pooled to examine student preference. The major findings indicated a significant preference for chunk-style videos between 3 and 17 min duration when compared to traditional long-view didactic lecture materials. Results also highlighted an increase in unique views (60%–67%), cumulative visits (54%–67%) and percentage completions (25%) of chunked videos compared to didactic lectures (60 min). Additionally, student total viewing of the unit information influenced the final grade for the unit. Student preference and success were in favour of the smaller chunk-style lectures, which may also improve student attention, assist with time management to complete the materials and increase unit engagement. The overall findings of this research re-enforce the value of student-centric learning design in university education settings.
Agahi, F. & Dmytrenko, N. (2016) ‘Chunking decision information: a way to make big data actionable’, Journal of Decision Systems, vol. 25, pp. 11–22. doi: 10.1080/12460125.2016.1187402
Au-Yong-Oliveira, M., et al., (2018) ‘The social impact of technology on millennials and consequences for higher education and leadership’, Telematics and Informatics, vol. 35, pp. 954–963. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.007
Bodie, G. D., Powers, W. G. & Fitch-Hauser, M. (2006) ‘Chunking, priming and active learning: toward an innovative and blended approach to teaching communication-related skills’, Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 14, pp. 119–135. doi: 10.1080/10494820600800182
Brettle, A. & Raynor, M. (2013) ‘Developing information literacy skills in pre-registration nurses: an experimental study of teaching methods’, Nurse Education Today, vol. 33, p. 103. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.003
Chen, C.-M. & Wu, C.-H. (2015) ‘Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance’, Computers and Education, vol. 80, pp. 108–121. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015
Chia, W. C., et al., (2015) ‘Hybrid learning for teaching computer fundamentals to 700 first year undergraduate students in 7-weeks’, IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services, pp. 163–168. doi: 10.1109/IC3e.2015.7403506
Cohen, N. R. & Sekuler, R. (2010) ‘Chunking and compound cueing of movement sequences: learning, retention, and transfer’, Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 110, pp. 736–750. doi: 10.2466/pms.110.3.736-750
Ebbert, D. & Dutke, S. (2020) ‘Patterns in students’ usage of lecture recordings: a cluster analysis of self-report data’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 28. pp. 1–44. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v28.2258
Evmenova, A. S. & Behrmann, M. M. (2011) ‘Research-based strategies for teaching content to students with intellectual disabilities: adapted videos’, Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, vol. 46, pp. 315–325, [online] Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880588
Farland, M. Z., et al., (2015) ‘Assessment of student learning patterns, performance, and long-term knowledge retention following use of didactic lecture compared to team-based learning’, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, vol. 7, pp. 317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2014.12.009
Ferrer-Vinent, I. J., et al., (2015) ‘Introducing scientific literature to honors general chemistry ctudents: teaching information literacy and the nature of research to first-year chemistry students’, Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 92, pp. 617–624. doi: 10.1021/ed500472v
Folley, D. (2010) ‘The lecture is dead long live the e-lecture’, Electronic Journal of e-Learning, vol. 8, pp. 93–100, [online] Available at: www.ejel.org
Gobet, F., et al., (2001) ‘Chunking mechanisms in human learning’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 236–243. doi: 10.1016/S1364–6613(00)01662-4.
Gottlieb, M., Riddell, J. & Njie, A. (2017) ‘Trends in national emergency medicine conference didactic lectures over a 6-year period’, The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, vol. 37, pp. 46–49. doi: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000144.
Guerrero, S., Baumgartel, D. & Zobott, M. (2013) ‘The use of screencasting to transform traditional pedagogy in a preservice mathematics content course’, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 32, pp. 173–193, [online] Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/40579/
Hadie, S. N. H., et al., (2018) ‘Creating an engaging and stimulating anatomy lecture environment using the Cognitive Load Theory-based Lecture Model: students’ experiences’, Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, vol. 13, pp. 162–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.11.001
Koufogiannakis, D. & Wiebe, N. (2006) ‘Effective methods for teaching information literacy skills to undergraduate students: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, vol. 1, pp. 3–43. doi: 10.18438/B8MS3D
Lah, N. C., Saat, R. M. & Hassan, R. (2014) ‘Cognitive strategy in learning chemistry: how chunking and learning get together’, Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 9–15, [online] Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086202
Leppink, J. (2017) ‘Cognitive load theory: practical implications and an important challenge’, Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, vol. 12, pp. 385–391. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.05.003
Lewis, P. J. (2016) ‘Brain friendly teaching—reducing learner’s cognitive load’, Academic Radiology, vol. 23, pp. 877–880. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.01.018
Mayer, R., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R. & Tapangco, L. (1996) ‘When less is more: meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons’, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 88, pp. 64–73. doi: 10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.168
Mcgee, P. (2014) ‘Blended course design: where’s the pedagogy?’, International Journal of ‘Mobile and Blended Learning, vol. 6, pp. 33–55. doi: 10.4018/ijmbl.2014010103
Miller, C. J., Mcnear, J. & Metz, M. J. (2013) ‘A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course’, Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 37, pp. 347–355. doi: 10.1152/advan.00050.2013
Miller, G. A. (1956) ‘The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information’, Psychology Review, vol. 63, pp. 81−97. doi: 10.1037/h0043158
Ordás, V. C. (2015) ‘Learning Spanish wine language through lexical chunks’, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 173, pp. 113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.039
Palenque, S. M. (2016) ‘The power of podcasting: perspectives on pedagogy’, Journal of Instructional Research, vol. 5, pp. 4–7. doi: 10.9743/JIR.2016.1
Reis, L. O., et al., (2015) ‘Delivery of a urology online course using moodle versus didactic lectures methods’, International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 84, pp. 149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.001
Risko, E. F., et al., (2013) ‘Everyday attention: mind wandering and computer use during lectures’, Computers and Education, vol. 68, pp. 275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.001
Rubio, E. I., et al., (2008) ‘Effect of an audience response system on resident learning and retention of lecture material’, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 190, pp. W319–W322. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3038
So, S. (2016) ‘Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education’, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 31, pp. 32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.001
Stephenson, J. E., Brown, C. & Griffin, D. K. (2008) ‘Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: an empirical comparison of three delivery styles’, Computers and Education, Vol. 50, pp. 640–651. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.007
Uslu, Ö. (2018) ‘Factors associated with technology integration to improve instructional abilities: a path model’, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 31–50. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2018v43n4.3
Weightman, A. L., et al., (2017) ‘A systematic review of information literacy programs in higher education: effects of face-to-face, online, and blended formats on student skills and views’, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, vol. 12, pp. 20–55. doi: 10.18438/B86W90
Wilson, K. & Korn, J. H. (2007) ‘Attention during lectures: beyond ten minutes’, Teaching of Psychology, vol. 34, pp. 85–89. doi: 10.1080/00986280701291291
Young, M. S., Robinson, S. & Alberts, P. (2009) ‘Students pay attention!: Combating the vigilance decrement to improve learning during lectures’, Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 10, pp. 41–55. doi: 10.1177/1469787408100194
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.