Cheap, accessible, and virtual experiences as tools for immersive study: a proof of concept study
Virtual and augmented reality technology is becoming more commonly available within a plethora of environments in which we exist, including educational environments. With advances in technology, and more exposure to its capabilities, there is a greater expectations and reliance on it. However, much of the hardware (and some of the software) which makes this technology usable is expensive and inaccessible to many. This article introduces a method for capturing and providing cost-effective virtual reality experiences, used here as a tool to give students improved accessory data and context regarding geological lab samples. The method introduced utilises the Google Cardboard camera app and Google Cardboard viewers. The virtual reality environment created is a mini-immersive experience that could be provided to students, or collected by students for their own use. The article reports results from a study of 20 participants who answered a questionnaire outlining their experiences of implementing the method. They responded positively, highlighting the applicability of the method to the task, the ease of use of tool and the accessibility of technology. Image quality of the method was raised as an area for improvement.
Alexander, B. (2006) ‘Web 2.0: a new wave of innovation for teaching and learning?’, Educause Review, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 32.
Allcoat, D. & von Mühlenen, A. (2018) ‘Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 26. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2140
Bates, K. T. et al. (2008) ‘Three-dimensional modelling and analysis of dinosaur trackways’, Palaeontology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 999–1010. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2008.00789.x
Bellamy, M. & Warren, A. (2011) ‘Using online practicals to support lab sessions’, Unpublished paper [online]. Available at: http://edshare.soton.ac.uk/id/document/243301
Boudreaux, H. et al. (2009, November) ‘V-volcano: addressing students’ misconceptions in earth sciences learning through virtual reality simulations’, International Symposium on Visual Computing, Springer, Berlin, pp. 1009–1018.
Boyle, A. et al. (2007) ‘Fieldwork is good: the student perception and the affective domain’, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 299–317. doi: 10.1080/03098260601063628
Burden, D. J. H. et al. (2017) ‘Fieldscapes – creating and evaluating a 3D virtual field trip system’, Coimbra: Workshop, Long and Short Paper, and Poster Proceedings from the Third Immersive Learning Research Network Conference (iLRN 2017), eds D. Beck et al., Immersive Learning Research Network, pp. 18–29. doi: 10.3217/978-3-85125-530-0-09
Butler, R.(2008) Teaching Geoscience through Fieldwork, Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Geography, Open University, Earth and Environmental Sciences, [online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rwh_Butler/publication/237656424_Teaching_Geoscience_through_Fieldwork/links/02e7e53870eff62fc5000000/Teaching-Geoscience-through-Fieldwork.pdf
Delabrida, S. et al. (2016) ‘Building wearables for geology: an operating system approach’, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 31–45.
Edwards, M. R. & Clinton, M. E. (2018) ‘A study exploring the impact of lecture capture availability and lecture capture usage on student attendance and attainment’, Higher Education, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10734-018-0275-9
Elkins, J. T. & Elkins, M. L. (2007) ‘Teaching geology in the field: significant geoscience concept gains in entirely field-based introductory geology courses’, Journal of Geoscience Education, vol. 55, pp. 126–132. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-55.2.126
Gamoran Sherin, M. (2003) ‘New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education’, in Using Video in Teacher Education, ed J. Brophy. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 1–27. doi: 10.1016/S1479-3687(03)10001-6
Geikie, J. (1912) Structural and Field Geology for Students of Pure and Applied Science, 3rd edn, Oliver and Boyd, London, 452 pp.
Giles, S., Jackson, C. & Stephen, N. (2020) ‘Barriers to fieldwork in undergraduate geoscience degrees’, Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 77–78. doi: 10.1038/s43017-020-0022-5
Hodgetts, D. (2013) ‘Laser scanning and digital outcrop geology in the petroleum industry: a review’, Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 46, pp. 335–354. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.02.014
Hsu, J.(2007) ‘Innovative technologies for education and learning: education and knowledge-oriented applications of blogs, wikis, podcasts, and more’, International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 70.
Kirkwood, A. & Price, L. (2014) ‘Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is “enhanced” and how do we know? A critical literature review’, Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 6–36. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
Kennedy, G. E. & Cutts, Q. I. (2005) ‘The association between students’ use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 260–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00133.x
Kolb, D. A. (2014) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Pearson, FT Press.
Lang, N. P., Lang, K. T. & Camodeca, B. M. (2012) ‘A geology-focused virtual field trip to Tenerife, Spain’, Geological Society of America Special Papers, vol. 492, pp. 323–334. doi: 10.1130/2012.2492(23)
Lin, C. R. & Loftin, R. B. (1998, November) ‘Application of virtual reality in the interpretation of geoscience data’, Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, ACM, New York, pp. 187–194. doi: 10.1145/293701.293736
Litherland, K. & Stott, T. A. (2012) ‘Virtual field sites: losses and gains in authenticity with semantic technologies’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 213–230. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2012.697773
Lui, M. & Slotta, J. D. (2014) ‘Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 57–80. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2013.838452
Maag, M. (2006) ‘Podcasting and MP3 players: emerging education technologies’, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 9–13.
Martínez-Graña, A. M., Goy, J. L. & Cimarra, C. A. (2013) ‘A virtual tour of geological heritage: valourising geodiversity using Google Earth and QR code’, Computers & Geosciences, vol. 61, pp. 83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2013.07.020
Mather, A. E. et al. (2015) ‘Ten years on: what can Google Earth offer the geoscience community?’, Geology Today, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 216–221. doi: 10.1111/gto.12119
McCaffrey, K. J. W. et al. (2008) ‘Visualization of folding in marble outcrops, Connemara, western Ireland: an application of virtual outcrop technology’, Geosphere, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 588–599. doi: 10.1130/GES00147.1
McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. (2007) ‘Social software and participatory learning: pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era’, Proceedings Ascilite Singapore [online] Available at: http://researchbank.acu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3049&context=fea_pub
McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. (2010) ‘Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: international exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 664–675. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1100
Means, B. (1993) Using Technology to Support Education Reform, Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Means, B. (ed) (1994) Technology and Education Reform, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Meyer, J. H. F. & Land, R. (2003) ‘Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines’, in Improving Student Learning: Improving Student Learning Theory and Practice – Ten Years On, ed C. Rust, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford, pp. 373–388.
Meyer, J. H. F. & Land, R. (2005) ‘Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning’, Higher Education, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 373–388. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
Moysey, S. M. et al. (2015, December) ‘Enabling field experiences in introductory geoscience classes through the use of immersive virtual reality’, in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.
O’Callaghan, F. V. et al. (2017) ‘The use of lecture recordings in higher education: a review of institutional, student, and lecturer issues’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 399–415. doi: 10.1007/s10639-015-9451-z
Selwyn, N. (2007) ‘The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 83–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
Schroeder, A., Minocha, S. & Schneider, C. (2010) ‘The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 159–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00347.x
Simpson, V. & Oliver, M.(2007) ‘Electronic voting systems for lectures then and now: a comparison of research and practice’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 187–208. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1264
Tobin, K. G. (2012) The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, Psychology Press, Routlidge, New York. doi: 10.4324/9780203053409
Trinks, I. et al. (2005) ‘Mapping and analysing virtual outcrops’, Visual Geosciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–19. doi: 10.1007/s10069-005-0026-9
Webster, R. (2015) ‘Declarative knowledge acquisition in immersive virtual learning environments’, Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1319–1333. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.994533
Wu, Q. & Xu, H. (2003) ‘An approach to computer modelling and visualization of geological faults in 3D’, Computers & Geosciences, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 503–509. doi: 10.1016/S1006-1266(07)60048-0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.