The case for engaging online tutors for supporting learners in higher education in refugee contexts
International development initiatives such as the Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 are helping to position higher education as a key solution available to policy makers in their efforts to alleviate various ongoing refugee crises around the world. As technology develops and higher education embraces new forms of delivery, such as blended learning approaches, university courses can be accessed in far-flung places and reach more people than ever before. With this increased emphasis on higher education solutions and more refugees taking advantage of these solutions, there is a growing awareness among practitioners that digital learning requires adequate support beyond merely transmitting educational materials to learners. This support or scaffolding requires the input of various instructional and administrative actors to create a successful collaborative learning model. Using InZone’s collaborative learning ecosystem for enabling higher education refugee contexts as a case study, this study examines the role of online tutors in such scaffolding. Various factors that shape online tutoring are explored and data collected from nine courses enabled in Azraq and Kakuma refugee camps in 2017 and 2018 are presented to support the use of online tutoring for improving course completion rates and ultimately making the case for engaging online tutors for higher education in refugee contexts.
Baiwa, P. (2016) ‘Retention in online courses: exploring issues and solutions – a literature review’, SAGE Open. Jan–March 2019 :1–11. doi: 10.1177/2158244015621777
Balkin, J. & Sonnevend, J. (2016) The Digital Transformation of Education. Chapter in Education and Social Media: Toward a Digital Future, eds C. Greenhow, J. Sonnevend & C. Agur, MIT Press. Cambridge, MA
Berghmans, I., et al., (2012) ‘A typology of approaches to peer tutoring. Unravelling peer tutors’ behavioural strategies’, European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 28, no. 3 (September 2013), pp. 703–723.
Bonk, C., & Graham, C. R. (2012) The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, John Wiley & Sons. San Francisco, CA
Briggs, J. (2013) ‘How peer teaching improves student learning and 10 ways to encourage it’, InformEd, [online]. Available at: http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/peer-teaching/
Carron, D., (2019) The Study and Teaching of Human Rights in Refugee Camps: Learning from Experience. Available at: https://www.europenowjournal.org/2019/03/04/the-study-and-teaching-of-human-rights-in-refugee-camps-learning-from-experience/
Centre for Teaching Excellence (CTE). (2017) Collaborative Learning: Group Work. Cornell University [online]. Available at: https://www.cte.cornell.edu/teaching-ideas/engaging-students/collaborative-learning.html
Cohen, J. A., et al., (1982) ‘Educational outcomes of tutoring: a meta-analysis of findings’, American Educational Research Journal, vol. 19, no. 2 (Summer, 1982), pp. 237–248.
Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986) ‘Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design’, Management Science, vol. 32, pp. 554–571.
Dahya, N. (2016) Landscape Review: Education in Conflict and Crisis – How can Technology Make a Difference? Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). Bonn.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999) ‘What do you mean by collaborative learning?’, in Collaborative-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, ed P. Dillenbourg, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 1–19.
De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2010) ’Studying thought processes of online peer tutors through stimulated-recall interviews’, Higher Education, vol. 59, no. 5 (May 2010), pp. 645–661.
De Smet, M., et al., (2008) ‘Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: an exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour’, Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 207–223.
Dooley, K. (2009) ‘Intercultural conversation: building understanding together’, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, vol. 52, no. 6 (Mar., 2009), pp. 497–506.
Eisner, S. (2004) ‘Teaching Generation Y – three initiatives’, Journal of College and Teaching Learning [online]. Available at: https://phobos.ramapo.edu/~seisner/Teaching.htm
Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7: 22–30.
Greenaway, T., et al., (2016) ‘Can MOOC’s be a model for providing quality higher education to refugees? Lessons from the first experiment’, The European Conference on Education 2016 Official Conference Proceedings [online]. Available at: http://papers.iafor.org/papers/ece2016/ECE2016_29698.pdf
Hartman, H. (1990) ‘Factors affecting the tutoring process’, Journal of Developmental Education, vol. 14, no. 2 (Winter 1990), pp. 2–4, 6.
Hofstede, G., et al., (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Revised and Expanded 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
Kirkman, B. L., et al., (2006) A quarter century of ‘‘Culture’s Consequences’’: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 285–320.
Lantolf, J. P. & Pavlenko, A. (1995) ’Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 15, pp. 108–124.
Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (2006) Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lee, P., et al., (2011) ‘Internet communication versus face-to-face interaction in quality of life’, Social Indicators Research, vol. 100, no. 3, Quality of Life Research: Responses to Emerging Issue in a Changing World (February 2011), pp. 375–389.
Lin, L. (2015) Investigating Chinese HE EFL Classrooms: Using Collbaorative Learning to Enhance Learning, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Manathunga, K. & Hernández-Leo, D. (2015) ‘Has research on collaborative learning technologies addressed massiveness? A Literature Review’, Educational Technology & Society, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 357–370.
Marques, J. (2013) ‘A short history of MOOCs and distance learning’, MOOC News and Reviews [online]. Available at: http://moocnewsandreviews.com/a-short-history-of-moocs-and-distance-learning/
McLuckie, J. & Topping, K. J. (2004) ‘Transferable skills for online peer learning’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 29, pp. 563–565.
Mook-Maker (2016) MOOC-Maker Construction of Management Capacities of MOOCs in Higher Education. Available at: http://www.mooc-maker.org/wpcontent/files/WPD1.6_INGLES.pdf
Moser-Mercer, B. (2014) ‘MOOCs in fragile contexts’, Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014 [online]. Available at: https://www.emoocs2014.eu/sites/default/files/Proceedings-Moocs-Summit-2014.pdf
Moser-Mercer, B., Kherbiche, L. & Class, B., (2014) ‘Interpreting conflict: Training challenges in humanitarian interpreting’, International Journal of Human Rights Practice, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–19.
Okdie, B., et al., (2011) Getting to know you: Face-to-face versus online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior (January 2011) 27:153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.017
Sherman, L., et al., (2013) ‘The effects of text, audio, video, and in-person communication on bonding between friends’, Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, vol. 7, no. 2, article 3. doi: 10.5817/CP2013-2-3
Short, J. A., et al., (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
UNHCR. (2015) Missing Out: Refugee Education in Crisis [online]. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/en-ie/aiming-higher.html
UNHCR. (2017) Figures at a Glance [online]. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/en-ie/figures-at-a-glance.html
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, (eds M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman), MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
1 SDG 4 articulates the promotion of lifelong learning as a development goal for the 2016–2030 development initiative period. See https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
2 This review is available for download from the INEE website http://www.ineesite.org/en/resources/landscape-review-education-in-conflict-and-crisis-how-can-technology-make-a
3 InZone is an academic research centre based at the University of Geneva that pioneers innovative approaches to multilingual communication and higher education in communities affected by conflict and crisis. For more details and detailed explanations of InZone’s projects see http://www.unige.ch/inzone
4 InZone has developed the following online training course for online tutors who wish to tutor refugees in refugee camps: http://inzone.unige.ch/online-tutoring/#/
5 For a detailed explanation of the theory and an in-depth exploration of each dimension see https://geert-hofstede.com/national-culture.html
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.