The Development of an Integrated Scale of Technology Use in Physics
In this study, the Integrated Scale of Technology Use in Physics (ISTUP) was developed to determine students’ frequency of technology use, their perceptions about the effects of technology use on physics interest and achievement, and their preferences of technological tools and applications in learning physics. The scale was administered two different times to 670 high school students in total who took physics courses. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to validate the scale. The results of the study suggest that the ISTUP is a valid and reliable scale. Students’ frequency of technology use in learning physics corresponded to ‘sometimes’. Students perceived that technology use had slightly positive effect on their interest and achievement. Findings regarding the interrelations between students’ preference for technological tools and applications were also discussed.
Afzal, M. T. & Fardous, N. (2016) ‘Students’ preferences of technology usage for their learning engagement’, American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 4, no.10, pp. 749–751. doi: 10.12691/education-4-10-7
Akpınar, E. (2014) ‘The use of interactive computer animations based on POE as a presentation tool in primary science teaching’, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 23, pp. 527–537. doi: 10.1007/s10956-013-9482-4
Albayrak, D. & Yildirim, Z. (2015) ‘Using social networking sites for teaching and learning: students’ involvement in and acceptance of Facebook® as a course management system’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 155-179. doi: 10.1177/0735633115571299
Alpert, S. R. & Grueneberg, K. (2001) ‘Multimedia in concept maps: a design rationale and web-based application’, in Proceedings of Ed-Media 2001: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, eds C. Montgomerie & J. Viteli, pp. 31–36.
Başer, V. G., et al. (2012) ‘Perceptions of students about technology integration’, Education Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 591–598.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014) Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum, 15th edn, Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
Çalik, M. (2013) ‘Effect of technology-embedded scientific inquiry on senior science student teachers’ self-efficacy’, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 223–232. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2013.931a
Çalik, M., et al. (2014) ‘Improving science student teachers’ self-perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and scientific inquiry abilities’, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 448–460. doi: 10.1007/s10956-014-9529-1
Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D. & Guidry, K. R. (2010) ‘Engaging online learners: the impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement’ Computers & Education, vol. 54, pp. 1222–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, Prentice Hall, Hillside, NJ.
Conole, G., et al. (2008) ‘Disruptive technologies’, ‘pedagogical innovation’: what’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology’, Computers & Education, vol. 50, no.2, pp. 511–524. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.009
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. &Warshaw, P. R. (1989) ‘User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models’, Management Science, vol. 35, pp. 982–1002. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Ebenezer, J. V. (2001) ‘A hypermedia environment to explore and negotiate students’ conceptions: animation of the solution process of table salt’, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 73–91. doi: 10.1023/A:1016672627842
Ebenezer, J. V., et al. (2012) ‘One science teacher’s professional development experience: a case study exploring changes in students’ perceptions of their fluency with innovative technologies’, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 21, pp. 22–37. doi: 10.1007/s10956-010-9277-9
Ebert, E. K., et al. (2009) ‘Learning science with inquiry in the Clark County School District’, in Inquiry the Key to Exemplary Science (Vol. 6), ed R. E. Yager, NSTA Press, Arlington, VA, pp. 253–271.
Felder, R. M. (1996) ‘Matters of style’, ASEE Prism, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 18–23.
Felder, R. M. & Brent, R. (2017) ‘Effective teaching: workshop’, Available at: https://engineering.purdue.edu/Engr/AboutUs/Administration/AcademicAffairs/Resources/Teaching/effective-teaching.pdf
Field, A. (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd edn, Sage Publications Ltd., London.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012) How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th edn, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY.
Frantom, C. G., Green, K. E. & Hoffman, E. R. (2002) ‘Measure development: the children’s attitudes toward technology scale (CATS)’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 249–263. doi: 10.2190/DWAF-8LEQ-74TN-BL37
Gunuc, S. & Kuzu, A. (2014) ‘Tendency scale for technology use in class: development, reliability and validity’, Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 863–884. doi: 10.17244/eku.19404
Hamilton, D. N. (2007) ‘The scholarship of teaching as transformative learning’, Transformative Dialogues, vol. 1, no.1, pp. 1–6.
Hinkin, T. R. (1998) A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires, Available at http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/521
Ho, R. (2013) Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis with IBM SPSS, 2nd edn., CRC Press, New York, NY.
Jonassen, D. H. (2006) Modelling with Technology: Mindtools for Conceptual Change, 3rd edn., Pearson, Boston, MA.
Korur, F., Toker, S. & Eryılmaz, A. (2016) ‘Effects of the integrated online advance organizer teaching materials on students’ science achievement and attitude’, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 25, no.4, pp. 628–640. doi: 10.1007/s10956-016-9618-4
Kozhevnikov, M., Gurlitt, J. & Kozhevnikov, M. (2013) ‘Learning relative motion concepts in immersive and non-immersive virtual environments’, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 22, pp. 952–962, doi: 10.1007/s10956-013-9441-0
Landry, B. J., Griffeth, R. & Hartman, S. (2006) ‘Measuring student perceptions of blackboard using the Technology Acceptance Model’, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, vol. 4, no.1, pp. 87–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00103.x
Levy, D. (2013) ‘How dynamic visualization technology can support molecular reasoning’ Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 22, pp. 702–717. doi: 10.1007/s10956-012-9424-6
Linn, M. C. & Eylon, B.-S. (2011) Science Learning and Instruction: Taking Advantage of Technology to Promote Knowledge Integration, Routledge, New York, NY.
Liu, C. (2018) ‘Social media as a student response system: new evidence on learning impact’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 26, pp. 1–29. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2043
Ma, W. W., Andersson, R. & Streith, K. O. (2005) ‘Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 387–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00145.x
Mirriahi, N. & Alonzo, D. (2015) ‘Shedding light on students’ technology preferences: implications for academic development’, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 6.
Morgado, F., et al. (2017) ‘Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices’, Psicologica: Reflexao e Critica, vol. 30, Article 3. doi: 10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1
Oblinger, D. (2003) Boomers gen-xers millennials: understanding the new students. Educause Review, vol. 500, no. 4, pp. 37–47.
Öksüz, C., Ak, Ş. & Uca Tabak, S. (2009) ‘A perceptions scale for technology use in the teaching of elementary mathematics’, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 6, pp. 270–287.
Önal, N. (2017) ‘Use of interactive whiteboard in the mathematics classroom: students’ perceptions within the framework of the Technology Acceptance Model’, International Journal of Instruction, vol. 10, no. 4, pp.67–86. doi: 10. 67-86. 10.12973/iji.2017.1045a
O’Neil, J. (1995) ‘On technology and schools: a conversation with Chris Dede’, Educational Leadership, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 6–13.
Özel, S. (2009) Development and Testing of Achievement from Multiple Modes of Mathematical Representation: Audio, Audio-Visual, and Kinesthetic, Dissertation Thesis, University of Texas A&M.
Pallant, J. (2007) SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows, 3th edn, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
Pituch, K. A. & Stevens, J. P. (2016) Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS, 6th edn, Routledge, New York, NY.
Ramma, Y., et al. (2018) ‘Teaching and learning physics using technology: making a case for the affective domain’, Education Inquiry, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 210–236. doi: 10.1080/20004508.2017.1343606
Reigeluth, C. M. (2012) ‘Instructional theory and technology for the new paradigm of education’, RED. Revista de Educación a distancia, vol. 32, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.6018/red/50/1b
Robertson, G. (2017) ‘Developing valid and reliable survey scales’, [online] Available at: https://i2ifacility.org/system/documents/files/000/000/010/original/Developing_valid_and_reliable_survey_scales_i2i_October_2017.pdf?1507625556
Saeed, N., Yang, Y. & Sinnappan, S. (2009) ‘Emerging web technologies in higher education: a case of incorporating blogs, podcasts and social bookmarks in a web programming course based on students’ learning styles and technology preferences’, Educational Technology & Society, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 98–109.
Şahin, M. G. & Boztunç Öztürk, N. (2018) ‘Scale development process in educational field: a content analysis research’, Kastamonu Education Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 191–199. doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.375863
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Muller, H. (2003) ‘Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures’, Methods of Psychological Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 23–74.
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th edn, Pearson, Boston.
Tekin, H. (2002) Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, Yargı Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Venkatesh, V. & Bala, H. (2008) ‘Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions’, Decision Sciences, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 273–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Yurdugül, H. & Aşkar, P. (2008) ‘An investigation of the factorial structures of pupils’ attitude towards technology (PATT): a Turkish sample’, Elementary Education Online, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 288–309.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.