Beyond description: in search of disciplinary digital capabilities through signature pedagogies
Keywords:
digital capabilities, digital literacies, disciplines, curriculum design, signature pedagogies, professional learning, engineering, management, higher education
Abstract
The development of digital capabilities has received significant attention in higher education (HE) in recent years, with various attempts made to develop digital frameworks to support curriculum design. However, few studies have articulated these generic capabilities in terms of specific disciplines. This paper addresses the gap by exploring how digital capabilities are planned in HE curricula in two professional disciplines, engineering and management, at the two UK universities. Originality of the study is achieved in part through a newly proposed conceptual framework that weaves Shulman’s notion of signature pedagogies together with Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)’s Digital Capability Framework (DigiCap). This study employed a multiple-case study methodology, drawing on documentary sources and academic, professional and student perspectives via interviews and focus groups. This study offers insight into the digital capabilities in engineering and management education, as well as the digital practices of engineers and managers. Findings report on which DigiCap elements are prioritised, and how, in the two professions, followed by a discussion of their most distinct ‘signature digital capabilities’. These indicate that the development of digital capabilities is aligned with the respective discipline’s signature pedagogies. This study argues that, simply just using a descriptive, typological framework is not sufficient to identify signature digital capabilities of a subject without tending to their disciplinary aspects. It is the combination of a typological DigiCap framework through the lens of signature pedagogies, which can be effective in identifying disciplinary digital capabilities. This approach is one of the major outcomes of this study.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Anagnostopoulou, K. (2013) Professionalism in Digital Education (Project Report), University of Bath, Bath.
Baume, D. (2012, November 14). Digital literacies and digital fluency a process of development? [Web log post] SEDASIG. Retrieved fromhttp://sedasig.wordpress.com/2012/11/14/digital-literacies-and-digital-fluency-a-process-of-development/
Becher, T. & Trowler, P. (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, 2nd edn, Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Beck, D. & Eno, J. (2012) ‘Signature pedagogy: a literature review of social studies and technology research’, Computers in the Schools, vol. 29, no. 1–2, pp. 70–94. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2012.658347
Becker, S. A., Pasquini, L. A. & Zentner, A. (2017, November). Digital Literacy Impact Study: An NMC Horizon Project Strategic Brief, New Media Consortium, Austin, TX. (V3.5).
Beetham, H., McGill, L. & Littlejohn, A. (2009) Thriving in the 21st Century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age (LLiDA Project), The Caledonian Academy, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow.
Belshaw, D. A. J. (2012) What Is “Digital Literacy”? A Pragmatic Investigation,Doctoral dissertation, Ed.D., University of Durham, Durham, [online] Available at: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3446/
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. S. (2011) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, McGraw-Hill; Society for Research into Higher Education ; Open University Press, Maidenhead, England.
Brown, S. A. (2014) ‘Conceptualizing digital literacies and digital ethics for sustainability education’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 280–290. doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-08-2012-0078
Bruce, B. C. & Casey, L. (2012) ‘The practice of inquiry: a pedagogical “sweet spot” for digital literacy?’, Computers in the Schools, vol. 29, no. 1–2, pp. 191–206. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2012.657994
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R. & Punie, Y. (2018) DigComp 2.1: Digital Competence Framework for Citizens, with Eight Proficiency Levels and Examples of Use, Joint Research Centre & EU Commission, Seville, Spain.
Chick, N. L., Haynie, A. & Gurung, R. A. R. (eds) (2012) Exploring More Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind, 1st edn, Stylus Pub, Sterling, VA.
Coldwell-Neilson, J. (2017, June) ‘Digital literacy: a driver for curriculum transformation’, in Research and Development in Higher Education: Curriculum Transformation, eds R. G. Walker & S. B. Bedford, vol. 40, pp. 84–94, Paper presented at HERDSA Conference, Sydney, HERDSA, Hammondville, Australia.
Crawley, E. F., et al., (2014) Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, 2nd edn, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.
Creswell, J. W. (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Dewey, J. (1938) Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Djumalieva, J. & Sleeman, C. (2018) Which Digital Skills Do You Really Need? Exploring Employer Demand for Digital Skills and Occupation Growth Prospects, Nesta, London.
Dotger, B. H., Harris, S. & Hansel, A. (2008) ‘Emerging authenticity: the crafting of simulated parent–teacher candidate conferences’, Teaching Education, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 337–349. doi: 10.1080/10476210802438324
Dym, C., et al., (2005) ‘Engineering design thinking’, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
European Commission [EC]. (2016, June) A New Skills Agenda for Europe: Working Together to Strengthen Human Capital, Employability and Competitiveness. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. Brussels, Belgium: Author. Retrieved fromhttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0381&from=EN
Ferrari, A. (2012) Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks, Report EUR 25351 EN, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, Spain. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/digital-competence-practice-analysis-frameworks
Fielding, G., et al., (2017) 2017 Digital Capabilities Survey, Report, 384, UCISA, [N.p.].
Goodfellow, R. (2011) ‘Literacy, literacies and the digital in higher education’, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 131–144. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.544125
Handley, F. (2018) ‘Developing digital skills and literacies in UK higher education: recent developments and a case study of the Digital Literacies Framework at the Univ. of Brighton’, Publicaciones, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 109–126. doi: 10.30827/publicaciones.v48i1.7327
Hinrichsen, J. & Coombs, A. (2013) ‘The five resources of critical digital literacy: a framework for curriculum integration’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 21334. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v21.21334
Hyland, Á. & Kilcommins, S. (2009) ‘Signature pedagogies and legal education in universities: epistemological and pedagogical concerns with case method’, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29–42. doi: 10.1080/13562510802602517
Ilomäki, L., et al., (2016) ‘Digital competence: an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 655–679. doi: 10.1080/13562510802602517
James, L. T. & Casidy, R. (2018) ‘Authentic assessment in business education: its effects on student satisfaction and promoting behaviour’, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 401–415. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1165659
Janssen, J., et al., (2013) ‘Experts’ views on digital competence: commonalities and differences’, Computers & Education, vol. 68, pp. 473–481. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008
JISC. (2017a) Building Digital Capability: The Six Elements Defined, Joint Information Systems Committee, Bristol. http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6611/1/JFL0066F_DIGIGAP_MOD_IND_FRAME.PDF
JISC. (2017b) Developing Digital Literacies: Guide (Website), Joint Information Systems Committee, Bristol. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/developing-digital-literacies
John, G. (2014) Exploring ESL Students’ Perceptions of Their Digital Reading Skills, Doctoral dissertation, Ed.D., University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
Jones, C., et al., (2010) ‘Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university?’, Computers & Education, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 722–732. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022
Jupp, J. R. & Awad, R. (2013) ‘Developing digital literacy in construction management education: a design thinking-led approach’, Journal of Pedagogic Development, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 24–30. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/27318
Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H. & McGill, L. (2012) ‘Learning at the digital frontier: a review of digital literacies in theory and practice’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 547–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00474.x
Lucas, B. & Hanson, J. (2016) ‘Thinking like an engineer: using engineering habits of mind and signature pedagogies to redesign engineering education’, International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 4–13. doi: 10.3991/ijep.v6i2.5366
McDougall, J., Readman, M. & Wilkinson, P. (2018) ‘The uses of (digital) literacy’, Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 263–279. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2018.1462206
Mihailidis, P. (2018) ‘Civic media literacies: re-imagining engagement for civic intentionality’, Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 152–164. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2018.1428623
Newman, T., Beetham, H. & Knight, S. (2018) Digital Experience Insights Survey 2018:Findings from Students in UK Further and Higher EducationJISC, Bristol, https://digitalinsights.jisc.ac.uk/news/digital-experience-insights-survey-2018-findings-students-uk-further-and-higher-education/
NHS Health Education England. (2017, March 28) Digital literacy, [online] Available at: https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/research-learning-innovation/technology-enhanced-learning/digital-literacy
Orlik, J. (2018) Delivering Digital Skills: A Guide to Preparing the Workforce for an Inclusive Digital Economy, Readie and Nesta, London. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Readie_Digital_Skills_booklet_online.pdf
Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. (2013, October) Digital Literacy in the Disciplines Table, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
Passey, D. (2012) ‘Educational technologies and mathematics: signature pedagogies and learner impacts’, Computers in the Schools, vol. 29, no. 1–2, pp. 6–39. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2012.651092
Payton, S. (2012) Developing Digital Literacies: Briefing Paper, JISC, Bristol. https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140615230301/http:/www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/briefingpaper/2012/Developing_Digital_Literacies.pdf
QAA. (2015a) QAA Subject Benchmark Statement.Business and Management, QAA. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-statements/subject-benchmark-statement-business-and-management.pdf?sfvrsn=db39c881_5
QAA. (2015b) QAA Subject Benchmark Statement.Engineering, QAA, Gloucester. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-statements/subject-benchmark-statement-engineering.pdf?sfvrsn=1f2c881_16
Remneland-Wikhamn, B. (2017) ‘Challenges of adopting constructive alignment in action learning education’, Action Learning: Research and Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1080/14767333.2016.1251880
Ritchie, J. (ed) (2011) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (Repr), Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA.
Schmidt-Wilk, J. (2010) ‘Signature pedagogy: a framework for thinking about management education’, Journal of Management Education, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 491–495. doi: 10.1177/1052562910376508
Sharpe, R. (2014) ‘What does it take to learn in next generation learning spaces?’, in The Future of Learning and Teaching in Next Generation Learning Spaces, International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, vol. 12, ed K. Fraser, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK, pp. 123–145.
Shulman, L. S. (2005a) ‘Pedagogies of uncertainty’, Liberal Education, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 18–25. https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/pedagogies-uncertainty#:~:text=There%20are%20those%20who%20believe,the%20mission%20of%20liberal%20education.&text=Professional%20pedagogies%20are%20continuously%20attempting,key%20ideas%20and%20effective%20practice
Shulman, L. S. (2005b) ‘Signature pedagogies in the professions’, Daedalus, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 52–59. doi: 10.1162/0011526054622015
Sinclair, S. (2013) ‘Digital literacy in religious studies’, Diskus: The Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religions (BASR), vol. 14, pp. 37–54. http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/41290
Tight, M. (2015). Theory development and application in higher education research: Tribes and territories. Higher Education Policy, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 277–293.
Tsatsou, P. (2017) ‘Literacy and training in digital research: researchers’ views in five social science and humanities disciplines’, New Media & Society, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1240–1259. doi: 10.1177/1461444816688274
University of Bath & JISC. (2012) Learner Digital Literacies Attributes in Engineering and Management: Outcomes of the Professionalism in the Digital Environment (PRiDE) Project, Bath, UK.
Varga-Atkins, T. (2018) Designing Curricula to Develop Digitally Capable Professionals in Engineering and Management – The Case in Two UK Universities, Thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
Warren, L. (2011) ‘Digital skills for digital disruption and value creation’, in Global Knowledge Work: Diversity and Relational Perspectives, eds K. Nicolopoulou et al., Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 230–242.
Wilkerson, J. E. (2010) ‘Accounting educators as the accounting profession’s trustees: lessons from a study of peer professions’, Issues in Accounting Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.2308/iace.2010.25.1.1
Yin, R. K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA.
Published
2020-09-17
How to Cite
Varga-Atkins T. (2020). Beyond description: in search of disciplinary digital capabilities through signature pedagogies. Research in Learning Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2467
Issue
Section
Original Research Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
.png){kind=spacer}
