Transforming the online learning space through advanced development retreats
Abstract
Learning technologies have the potential to transform Higher Education, although multifaceted demands on staff time, confidence and training in using new technologies, and a lack of support can make this transformation difficult. The University of Huddersfield recently transitioned to a new virtual learning environment (VLE), which provided the opportunity to change the way staff view and use the new VLE for teaching and learning. As part of this project, three off-site retreats were run to help staff to reflect on and develop their teaching practice to better support student learning in the digital space and develop advanced online resources that support the democratisation of learning, close differential attainment gaps and give every student the best chance of success. Although much is written about different models of practice, there is a lack of theory and conceptualisation around changing practice. Examining the motivations and experiences of staff who participated provides insight into the challenges of implementing change on an institutional level, whilst examining their setup and design highlights ways to support staff during this process. Using participant feedback and experiences to underpin this research, we explore the immediate and ongoing outcomes of these off-site retreats to help transform the University’s approach to technology-enhanced learning.
Downloads
References
Al-Adwan, A. S., Al-Madadha, A. & Zvirzdinaite, Z. (2018) ‘Modeling students’ readiness to adopt mobile learning in higher education: An empirical study’, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 221–241. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3256
Al Meajel, T. M. & Sharadgah, T. A. (2018) ‘Barriers to using the blackboard system in teaching and learning: Faculty perceptions’, Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 351–366. doi: 10.1007/s10758-017-9323-2
Bayne, S. (2015) ‘What’s the matter with “technology-enhanced learning”?’, Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5–20. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2014.915851
Beetham, H. & Sharpe, R. (2013) Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning, 2nd edn, Routledge, London. doi: 10.4324/9780203078952
Bernhard, J. & Case, J. M. (2020) ‘How does EER conceptualize its object of study? – an exploration based on the “Didaktik Triangle”’, SEFI 2020, 48th Annual Conference, Enschede, the Netherlands, pp. 75–83.
Boud, D. & Brew, A. (2013) ‘Reconceptualising academic work as professional practice: implications for academic development’, The International Journal for Academic Development, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 208–221. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2012.671771
Brady, M. & O’Reilly, N. (2020) ‘Learning management systems and their impact on academic work’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 251–268. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1743746
Cheng, C. K., et al., (2011) ‘Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary online discussion forum on improving students’ course performance’, Computers and Education, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.024
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. R. B. (2018) Research Methods in Education, 8th edn, Routledge, London.
de Freitas, S. & Oliver, M. (2005) ‘Does E-learning policy drive change in higher education?: a case study relating models of organisational change to e-learning implementation’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 81–96. doi: 10.1080/13600800500046255
Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D. & Price, L. (2017) ‘Teaching with technology in higher education: understanding conceptual change and development in practice’, Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 73–87. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300
Ericsson, K. A. (2008) ‘Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview’, Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 988–994. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x
Flavin, M. (2016) ‘Technology-enhanced learning and higher education’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 632–645. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grw028
Gentles, S. J., et al., (2016) ‘Reviewing the research methods literature: principles and strategies illustrated by a systematic overview of sampling in qualitative research’, Systematic Reviews, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 172. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0343-0
Gregory, M. S. & Lodge, J. M. (2015) ‘Academic workload: the silent barrier to the implementation of technology-enhanced learning strategies in higher education’, Distance Education, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 210–230. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1055056
Hammersley, M. (2013) What is Qualitative Research?, Bloomsbury Academic, London. doi: 10.5040/9781849666084
Kemp, S. J. & Day, G. (2014) ‘Teaching medical humanities in the digital world: affordances of technology-enhanced learning’, Medical Humanities, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 125–130. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2014-010518
Kerr, C., Nixon, A. & Wild, D. (2010) ‘Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquiry supporting patient-reported outcomes research’, Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 269–281. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.30
Kirkwood, A. (2009) ‘E-learning: you don’t always get what you hope for’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 107–121. doi: 10.1080/14759390902992576
Kirkwood, A. & Price, L. (2005) ‘Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: what do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses?’, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 257–274. doi: 10.1080/03075070500095689
Kirkwood, A. & Price, L. (2014) ‘Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is “enhanced” and how do we know? A critical literature review’, Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 6–36. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
Kornhaber, R., et al., (2016) ‘The benefits and challenges of academic writing retreats: an integrative review’, Higher education research and development, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1210–1227. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2016.1144572
Latif, F. (2017) ‘TELFest: an approach to encouraging the adoption of educational technologies’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 25, p. 14. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v25.1869
Laurillard, D. (2008) ‘Technology enhanced learning as a tool for pedagogical innovation’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, vol. 42, no. 3–4, pp. 521–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00658
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Levy, D. (2017) ‘Online, blended and technology-enhanced learning: tools to facilitate community college student success in the digitally-driven workplace’, Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 255–261. doi: 10.19030/cier.v10i4.10039
Murphy, P. (2008) ‘Defining pedagogy’, in Pedagogy and Practice: Culture and Identities, eds K. Hall, P. Murphy & J. Soler, Sage, London, pp. 28–39.
Ng, W. (2015) New Digital Technology in Education: Conceptualizing Professional Learning for Educators, Springer International Publishing, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05822-1
Novak, G. M., et al., (1999) Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology, Prentice Hall, London; Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Patton, R. (2018) ‘Digital evolution: a new approach to learning and teaching in higher education’, Times Higher Education Blog, [online] Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/digital-evolution-new-approach-learning-and-teaching-higher-education
Petit dit Dariel, O., Wharrad, H. & Windle, R. (2013) ‘Exploring the underlying factors influencing e-learning adoption in nurse education’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 69 no. 6, pp. 1289–1300. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06120.x
Price, L. & Kirkwood, A. (2014) ‘Informed design of educational technology for teaching and learning? Towards an evidence informed model of good practice’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 325–347. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2014.942749
Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn, Free Press, New York.
Salmon, G., Jones, S. & Armellini, A. (2008) ‘Building institutional capability in e-learning design’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 95–109. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v16i2.10889
UCISA. (2020) ‘UCISA 2020 TEL survey report’, UCISA, [online] Available at: https://www.ucisa.ac.uk/TEL2020
Watermeyer, R., et al., (2020) ‘COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: afflictions and affordances of emergency online migration’, Higher Education, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 623–641. doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00561-y
Watters, A. (2020a) Ed-Tech and Trauma. Hack Education. [online] Available at: http://hackeducation.com/2020/11/05/trauma
Watters, A. (2020b) The Ed-Tech Imaginary. Hack Education. [online] Available at: http://hackeducation.com/2020/06/21/imaginary
Young, S. & Nichols, H. (2017) ‘A reflexive evaluation of technology-enhanced learning’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 25, p. 13. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v25.1998
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
_0%20(002).jpg)
.png){kind=spacer}
