Exploring the characteristics of adults’ online learning activities: a case study of EdX online institute
Online learning has become a prevailing trend among adult learners. Therefore, this study investigated the learning time preference and the relationship between the course completion and learning activities among adult learners based on data from one online learning platform. Results indicate that a periodical fluctuation of participating online course study exists among adult learners. Additionally, the activity of posting on the discussion board is a main learning activity factor that influences their online course completion. It is expected that this study would help online learning system designers, education administrators and instructors to better understand the characteristics of adult learners and their learning activities to provide better accessibility and flexibility in online learning environments for them.
Blackmore, J. (1996) ‘Pedagogy: learning styles’, in Telecommunications for Remote Work and Learning. Available at: http://granite.cyg.net/~jblackmo/diglib/styl-a.html
Blagojević, M. & Milošević, D. (2015) ‘Massive open online courses: EdX vs Moodle MOOC’, 5th International Conference on Information Society and Technology, Kopaonik, Serbia, pp. 346–351.
Bonk, C. J. & Reynolds, T. H. (1997) ‘Learner-centered Web instruction for higher-order thinking, teamwork, and apprenticeship’, Web-Based Instruction, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 167–178.
Brophy, J. & Alleman, J. (1991) ‘Activities as instructional tools: a framework for analysis and evaluation’, Educational Researcher, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 9–23. doi: 10.3102/0013189X020004009
Cercone, K. (2008) ‘Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design’, AACE Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 137–159.
Ch, S. K. & Popuri, S. (2013) ‘Impact of online education: a study on online learning platforms and edX’, 2013 IEEE International Conference in MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), IEEE, Jaipur, India, pp. 366–370.
Chuang, I. & Ho, A (2016) ‘HarvardX and MITx: Four Years of Open Online Courses – Fall 2012–Summer 2016’, Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2889436
Cross, K. P. (1981) Adults as Learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cundell, A. & Sheepy, E. (2018) ‘Student perceptions of the most effective and engaging online learning activities in a blended graduate seminar’, Online Learning, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 87–102. doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i3.1467
Dabbagh, N. (2007) ‘The online learner: characteristics and pedagogical implications’, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 217–226.
Davis, J. R. (1972) ‘The changing college calendar’, The Journal of Higher Education, [online] vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 142–150. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22904/
Diaz, D. P. (1999) ‘CD/Web hybrids: delivering multimedia to the online learner’, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, [online] vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 89–98. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/10810/
Díaz, H. J. P., et al., (2015) ‘Using video visualizations in open edX to understand learning interactions of students’, Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World, Springer, Cham, pp. 522–525.
Freire, M., del Blanco, Á. & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2014) ‘Serious games as edX MOOC activities’, 2014 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (Educon), IEEE, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 867–871.
Gaebel, M. (2013) ‘MOOCs – Massive open online courses’, EUA Occasional Papers, available at: http://www.eua.be, accessed December 6, 2016
Gao, F., Zhang, T. & Franklin, T. (2013) ‘Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: recent progress and possible future directions’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 469–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x
Gold, H. E. (2005) ‘Engaging the adult learner: creating effective library instruction’, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 467–481. doi: 10.1353/pla.2005.0051
Herrington, J., et al., (2004) ‘Designing authentic activities in web-based courses’, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3–29. doi: 10.1007/BF02960280
Hollands, F. M. & Tirthali, D. (2014) MOOCs: Expectations and Reality, Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/download/33728665/MOOCs_Expectations_and_Reality.pdf
Jaramillo-Morillo, D., et al., (2017) ‘Follow-up of learning activities in open edx: a case study at the University of Cauca’, European Conference on Massive Open Online Courses, Springer, Cham, pp. 217–222.
Kauffman, H. (2015) ‘A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 23, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
Mazzolini, M. & Maddison, S. (2007) ‘When to jump in: the role of the instructor in online discussion forums’, Computers & Education, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 193–213. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.011
Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mitros, P. F., et al., (2013) ‘Teaching electronic circuits online: lessons from MITx’s 6.002 x on edX’, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), IEEE, Beijing, China, pp. 2763–2766.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2001) Distance Education at Postsecondary Education Institutions: 2000–2001.Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003017.pdf
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019) Digest of Education Statistics: 2019. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019144.pdf
Nguyen, V. A. (2017) ‘The impact of online learning activities on student learning outcome in blended learning course’, Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, vol. 16, no.4, pp. 1750040. doi: 10.1142/S021964921750040X
Pardos, Z. A., et al., (2013) ‘Adapting Bayesian knowledge tracing to a massive open online course in edX’, EDM, vol. 13, pp. 137–144.
Park, J. (2007) ‘Factors related to learner dropout in online learning’, in Proceedings of the 2007 Academy of Human Resource Development Annual Conference, eds F. M. Nafukho, T. H. Chermack & C. M. Graham, AHRD, Indianapolis, IN, pp. 25-1–125-8.
Park, J. H. & Choi, H. J. (2009) ‘Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning’, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 207–217.
Parry, M. (2012, October 1). Five ways that edX could change education. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/article/5-ways-that-edx-could-change-education/
Roper, A. R. (2007) ‘How students develop online learning skills’, Educause Quarterly, [online] vo. 30, no. 1, pp. 62–65. Available at: https://www.vistacampus.gov/system/files/legacy/37/VISTABlend/documents/how_students_develop_online_learning_skills.pdf
Ruiz, J. S., et al., (2014) ‘Towards the development of a learning analytics extension in open edX’, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Salamanca, Spain, pp. 299–306.
Sanchez-Gordon, S. & Luján-Mora, S. (2013) ‘Web accessibility of MOOCs for elderly students’, 2013 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), IEEE, Antalya, Turkey, pp. 1–6.
Sanchez-Gordon, S. & Luján-Mora, S. (2016) ‘How could MOOCs become accessible? The case of edX and the future of inclusive online learning’, Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 55–81.
Shah, D. (2016) ‘MOOC aggregator class central’, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Salamanca, Spain, pp. 299–306.
Shrivastava, A. (2018) ‘Using connectivism theory and technology for knowledge creation in cross-cultural communication’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 26, pp. 1–16. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2061
Simonds, T. A. & Brock, B. L. (2014) ‘Relationship between age, experience, and student preference for types of learning activities in online courses’, Journal of Educators Online, vol. 11, no. 1, p. n1. doi: 10.9743/JEO.2014.1.3
Simonson, M. R., et al., (1997) Distance Education: Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Stein, D. & Glazer, H. R. (2003) ‘Mentoring the adult learner in academic midlife at a distance education university’, The American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7–23. doi: 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1701_2
Waits, T., & Lewis, L. (2003). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000–2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics
Waits, T. (2003) Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000–2001. National Center for Education Statistics.
Wang, M., et al., (2009) ‘The impact of mobile learning on students’ learning behaviours and performance: report from a large blended classroom’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 673–695. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00846.x
Zhang, A., Culbertson, B. & Paritosh, P. (2017) ‘Characterizing online discussion using coarse discourse sequences’, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Montreal, Canada, pp. 357–366.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.