Social presence as a training resource: comparing VR and traditional training simulations

  • Jakob Carl Uhl AIT Austrian Institute for Technology, Center for Technology Experience, Vienna, Austria; and Department for Artificial Intelligence and Human Interfaces, PLUS University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
  • Klaus Neundlinger Institute for Cultural Excellence GmbH, Oberalm, Austria
  • Georg Regal AIT Austrian Institute for Technology, Center for Technology Experience, Vienna, Austria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.2827
Keywords: Social Presence, Experiential Learning, Virtual Reality, Social Skills, Learning Engagement

Abstract

From immersive simulations to interactive tutorials, Virtual Reality (VR) is transforming the way we learn and practise new skills. Especially for social skills training, a growing number of simulations have been designed in which trainees learn to master difficult communicative situations. One of the factors to which the effectiveness of VR as a learning technology is attributed to is the users’ feeling of social presence during the simulated interaction. This paper presents the evaluation of (1) a role play training, (2) a learning app and (3) a VR training application in a workshop series. Social presence was perceived as equally convincing and engaging for the prototypical VR scene as for the traditional form of role play, although the course of the interaction in VR was highly determined compared to the interaction dynamics of a human role play. In our interpretation, this confirms social presence as a valuable resource for training social interaction, which spans across various learning settings and methods in increasingly blended or hybrid learning and working contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


Allen, T. T., et al., (2020) ‘Charisma™: a virtual reality training to promote Social Brain Health in adults’, in D.W. Nangle, C.A. Erdley & R.A. Schwartz-Mette, Social Skills Across the Life Span, Elsevier, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 295–309. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817752-5.00015-9

Beard, C. & Wilson, J. P. (2018) Experiential Learning: A Practical Guide for Training, Coaching and Education, Kogan Page Publishers, London (England, UK).


Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. (1995) ‘Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x


Biocca, F., and Harms, C. (2002). ‘Defining and measuring social presence: Contribution to the networked minds theory and measure,’ in Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Workshop on Presence (Porto).


Biocca, F., Harms, C. & Burgoon, J. K. (2003) ‘Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria’, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 456–480. doi: 10.1162/105474603322761270


Bylund, C. L., et al., (2008) ‘Training faculty to facilitate communication skills training: development and evaluation of a workshop’, Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 430–436. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.024


Cooren, F., et al., (2014) Language and Communication at Work: Discourse, Narrativity, and Organizing, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford (England, UK).


Eckert, D. & Mower, A. (2020) The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Soft Skills Training in the Enterprise: A Study. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/546376


Edmondson, A. C. (2012) Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (New Jersey, United States).


Edmondson, A. C., Casciaro, T. & Jang, S. (2019) ‘Cross-silo leadership’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 130–139.


Fox, J., et al., (2015) ‘Avatars versus agents: a meta-analysis quantifying the effect of agency on social influence’, Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 401–432. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2014.921494


Frankus, E., et al., (2021) ‘Co-creating interactive virtual reality training environments. Reflections on a model for a participatory design process’, in ICCGI 2021. The Sixteenth International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology. pp. 1–5, Nice, France.


Guimaraes, M., et al., (2020) ‘The impact of virtual reality in the social presence of a virtual agent’, in Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, pp. 1–8.


Gunawardena, C. N. (1995) ‘Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences’, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 147–166.


Holt, S. & Marques, J. (2012) ‘Empathy in leadership: appropriate or misplaced? An empirical study on a topic that is asking for attention’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 95–105. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0951-5


Howard, M. C. & Gutworth, M. B. (2020) ‘A meta-analysis of virtual reality training programs for social skill development’, Computers & Education, vol. 144, p. 103707. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103707


Kolb, D. (2015) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, FT Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ.


Lugrin, B., Pelachaud, C. & Traum, D. (2021) The Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents: 20 years of Research on Embodied Conversational Agents, Intelligent Virtual Agents, and Social Robotics Volume 1: Methods, Behavior, Cognition, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, doi: 10.1145/3477322.3477324


Mangham, I. L. & Overington, M. A. (1987) Organizations as Theatre: A Social Psychology of Dramatic Appearances. John Wiley & Sons.


Neundlinger, K., et al., (2022) ‘Training social skills in virtual reality machine learning as a process of co-creation’, in Disruptive Technologies in Media, Arts and Design, eds. A. Dingli et al., Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 139–156. ISBN: 978-3-030-93780-5.


Nissley, N., Taylor, S. S. & Houden, L. (2004) ‘The politics of performance in organizational theatre-based training and interventions’, Organization Studies, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 817–839. doi: 10.1177/0170840604042416


Nowak, K. & Biocca, F. (2001) ‘Understanding the influence of agency and anthropomorphism on copresence, social presence and physical presence with virtual humans’, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 481–494. doi: 10.1162/105474603322761289


Persky, S., et al., (2009) ‘Presence relates to distinct outcomes in two virtual environments employing different learning modalities’, CyberPsychology & Behavior, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 263–268. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0262


Regal, G., et al., (2022) ‘Marcus or Mira – investigating the perception of virtual agent gender in virtual reality role play-training’, in Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST ’22, Association for Computing Machinery, Tsukuba, Japan. ISBN: 9781450398893. doi: 10.1145/3562939.3565629


Robb, C. A. & Sutton, J. (2014) ‘The importance of social presence and motivation in distance learning’, The Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering, vol. 30, no.2, pp. 1–10. https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jtmae/issue/1101/info/


Sajjadi, P., et al., (2019) ‘A personality-based emotional model for embodied conversational agents: effects on perceived social presence and game experience of users’, Entertainment Computing, vol. 32, p. 100313. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2019.100313


Schmid Mast, M., et al., (2018) ‘The future of interpersonal skills development: immersive virtual reality training with virtual humans’, Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 125–141. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21307


Schreyogg, G. & Dabitz, R. (1999) Unternehmenstheater, Dr. Th. Gabler Verlag. ISBN: 978-3-409-11480-6, Wiesbaden (Germany).


Theeuwes, J. & Van der Stigchel, S. (2006) ‘Faces capture attention: evidence from inhibition of return’, Visual Cognition, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 657–665. doi: 10.1080/13506280500410949


Troeger, J. Tümler, J. (2020) ‘Virtual Reality zur Steigerung empathischer Anteilnahme’, in Weyers, B., Lürig, C. & Zielasko, D. (eds.): GI VR / AR Workshop Proceedings, Trier.


Uhl, J. C., et al., (2023) ‘Tangible immersive trauma simulation: is mixed reality the next level of medical skills training?’, in Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’23, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1145/3544548.3581292


Waterworth, J., Riva, G. (2014) Feeling Present in the Physical World and in Computer-Mediated Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.


Zhao, H., Sullivan, K. P. H. & Mellenius, I. (2014) ‘Participation, interaction and social presence: an exploratory study of collaboration in online peer review groups’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 807–819. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12094

Published
2023-06-20
How to Cite
Uhl J. C., Neundlinger K., & Regal G. (2023). Social presence as a training resource: comparing VR and traditional training simulations. Research in Learning Technology, 31. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.2827
Issue
Vol. 31 (2023)
Section
Original Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors contributing to Research in Learning Technology retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC