Predicting the secondary school students’ intention to use e-learning technologies

Keywords: e-learning, TAM, technology acceptance, perceived enjoyment, secondary school students, K-12


Technology acceptance studies are interesting because they are practical and theoretically helpful in explaining the adoption and intention to use a particular technology. There is a large amount of research on e-learning and other technologies in the literature, but there is limited evidence to explain why secondary school students’ intention to use e-learning. This study explains secondary school students’ intentions to use e-learning with an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). TAM is a useful theory to explain how people adopt new technologies in different fields. Data were collected from 2739 secondary school students in Turkey (Mage = 11.95). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM) were used to test the conceptual model. The results are consistent with the original TAM model. The most critical variable affecting secondary school students’ intention to use e-learning technologies is enjoyment. The results show that there may be differences in the intention to use e-learning technologies for secondary school students in different cultures and contexts.


Download data is not yet available.


Abdullah, F. & Ward, R. (2016) ‘Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors’, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 56, pp. 238–256. doi: 10.1016/J.CHB.2015.11.036

Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Aktay, S. & Keskin, T. (2016) ‘Eğitim Bilişim Ağı (EBA) incelemesi’, Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 238–256. Available at:

Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A. & Althunibat, A. (2020) ‘Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 25, pp. 5261–5280. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y

Al-Rahmi, W. M. et al., (2019) ‘Integrating technology acceptance model with innovation diffusion theory: an empirical investigation on students’ intention to use e-learning systems’, IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 26797–26809. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899368

Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) ‘Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 411–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Arnesen, K. T. et al., (2019) ‘K-12 online learning journal articles: trends from two decades of scholarship’, Distance Education, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 32–53. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1553566

Asvial, M., Mayangsari, J. & Yudistriansyah, A. (2021) ‘Behavioral Intention of e-Learning: a case study of distance learning at a junior high school in Indonesia due to the COVID-19 pandemic’, International Journal of Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 54–64. doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v12i1.4281

Atmaca, D. (2021) ‘A study on the Educational Informatics Network (EBA) live course application in the “COVID-19” pandemic process’, Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 301–313. Available at:

Bandura, A. (1993) ‘Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning’, Educational Psychologist, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 117–148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

Bhaumik, R. & Priyadarshini, A. (2020) ‘E-readiness of senior secondary school learners to online learning transition amid COVID-19 lockdown’, Asian Journal of Distance Education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 244–256. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.3891822

Bozkurt, A. (2017) ‘Türkiye’de Uzaktan Eğitimin Dünü, Bugünü ve Yarını’, Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–124. Available at:

Can, E. (2020) ‘Coronavirüs (Covid-19) pandemisi ve pedagojik yansımaları: Türkiye’de açık ve uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları’, Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 11–53. Available at:

Castiblanco Jimenez, I. A. et al., (2020) ‘Commonly used external TAM variables in e-learning, agriculture and virtual reality applications’, Future Internet, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 7. doi: 10.3390/fi13010007

Chang, C.-T., Hajiyev, J. & Su, C.-R. (2017) ‘Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for E-learning approach’, Computers & Education, vol. 111, pp. 128–143. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010

Cheng, M. & Yuen, A. H. K. (2018) ‘Student continuance of learning management system use: a longitudinal exploration’, Computers & Education, vol. 120, pp. 241–253. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.004

Cheng, M. & Yuen, A. H. K. (2019) ‘Cultural divides in acceptance and continuance of learning management system use: a longitudinal study of teenagers’, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1613–1637. doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09680-5

Cheng, Y.-M. (2011) ‘Antecedents and consequences of e-learning acceptance’, Information Systems Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 269–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00356.x

Cicha, K. et al., (2021) ‘COVID-19 and higher education: first-year students’ expectations toward distance learning’, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 1889. doi: 10.3390/su13041889

Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995) ‘Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test’, MIS Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 189. doi: 10.2307/249688

Davis, F. D. (1989) ‘Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology’, MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) ‘Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace1’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 1111–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x

Davis, F. D. & Venkatesh, V. (1996) ‘A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 19–45. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040

Findik-Coşkunçay, D., Alkiş, N. & Özkan-Yildirim, S. (2018) ‘A structural model for students’ adoption of Learning Management Systems: an empirical investigation in the higher education context’, Educational Technology and Society, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 13–27. Available at:

Fiş Erümit, S. (2021) ‘The distance education process in K–12 schools during the pandemic period: evaluation of implementations in Turkey from the student perspective’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 75–94. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1856178

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981) ‘Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312

Gallagher, M. W. (2012) ‘Self-efficacy’, in Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, V.S. Ramachandran, (ed.), 2nd edn, Elsevier, New York, pp. 314–320. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00312-8

Hair, J. F., Page, M. & Brunsveld, N. (2019) Essentials of Business Research Methods, 4th edn, Routledge, New York. doi: 10.4324/9780429203374

Hara, H., Takemura, A. & Yoshida, R. (2010) ‘On connectivity of fibers with positive marginals in multiple logistic regression’, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 909–925. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2009.12.014

Hwang, L.-A. et al., (2021) ‘Nurturing academic enthusiasm and creativity among children from vulnerable communities: the role of computers’, Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 41, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1938227

Kanwal, F. & Rehman, M. (2017) ‘Factors affecting e-learning adoption in developing countries–empirical evidence from Pakistan’s higher education sector’, IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 10968–10978. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2714379

Kline and Rex, B. (2011) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn, The Guilford Press, New York.

Kuliya, M. & Usman, S. (2021) ‘Perceptions of E-learning among undergraduates and academic staff of higher educational institutions in north-eastern Nigeria’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1787–1811. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10325-x

Lavrakas, P. (2008) Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. doi: 10.4135/9781412963947

Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K. & Chen, Z. (2005) ‘Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation’, Information & Management, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1095–1104. doi: 10.1016/

Legris, P., Ingham, J. & Collerette, P. (2003) ‘Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model’, Information & Management, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 191–204. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4

Marangunić, N. & Granić, A. (2015) ‘Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013’, Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 81–95. doi: 10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

McCoy, S., Galletta, D. F. & King, W. R. (2007) ‘Applying TAM across cultures: the need for caution’, European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 81–90. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000659

Nguyen, H. T. H. et al., (2020) ‘Factors influencing students’ intention to use e-learning system: a case study conducted in Vietnam’, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 15, no. 18, pp. 165–182. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i18.15441

Purnomo, S. H. & Lee, Y.-H. (2013) ‘E-learning adoption in the banking workplace in Indonesia’, Information Development, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 138–153. doi: 10.1177/0266666912448258

Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008) An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis, An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis, Routledge, New York. doi: 10.4324/9780203809532

Rizun, M. & Strzelecki, A. (2020) ‘Students’ acceptance of the COVID-19 impact on shifting higher education to distance learning in Poland’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 18, p. 6468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186468

Salloum, S. A. et al., (2019) ‘Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model’, IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 128445–128462. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467

Teo, T. et al., (2019) ‘Exploring the drivers of technology acceptance: a study of Nepali school students’, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 495–517. doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09654-7

Teo, T., Luan, W. S. & Sing, C. C. (2008) ‘A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: an application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)’, Educational Technology and Society, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 265–280. Available at:

Teo, T. & Noyes, J. (2014) ‘Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a multi-group analysis of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology’, Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 51–66. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2011.641674

Venkatesh, V. & Bala, H. (2008) ‘Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions’, Decision Sciences, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 273–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Vladova, G. et al., (2021) ‘Students’ acceptance of technology-mediated teaching – how it was influenced during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: a study from Germany’, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, p. 636086. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086

Zhao, Y. et al., (2021) ‘Do cultural differences affect users’ e-learning adoption? A meta-analysis’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 20–41. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13002
How to Cite
Bahçekapılı E. (2023). Predicting the secondary school students’ intention to use e-learning technologies. Research in Learning Technology, 31.
Original Research Articles