Achieving online dialogic learning using breakout rooms

  • Shonagh Douglas Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
Keywords: breakout rooms, dialogic learning, conversational framework, online, learning

Abstract

The use of breakout rooms is an increasingly used tool in online teaching. This study uses Laurillard’s (2013) Conversational Framework to evaluate the effectiveness of breakout rooms in achieving learning through peer-to-peer dialogue in large-scale teaching. Data were collected through online surveys, comprising Likert ratings and open questions, to undergraduate students (n = 115) and tutors (n = 9) at Aberdeen Business School (Robert Gordon University) reflecting on Year 1 studies in the 2020–2021 academic year. Key findings indicate that breakout rooms can be successful in achieving effective learning through peer-to-peer dialogue. However, this is highly dependent on the participation by students, which was variable. In order to facilitate effective breakout rooms, tutors need to ensure they set a clear task, with evidence suggesting a perception gap between tutors and students on how effectively this was done, and regularly visit breakout rooms to encourage participation and provide support.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


Alexander, R. (2018) ‘Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial’, Research Papers in Education, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 561–598. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140


Bjuland, R. & Helgevold, N. (2018) ‘Dialogic processes that enable student teachers’ learning about pupil learning in mentoring conversations in a Lesson Study field practice’, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 70, pp. 246–254. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.026


Brewster, D. M. (2009) Interrupted Conversations: Enhancing Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Take Account of ‘Disruption’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Sussex.


Cadieux, M., et al., (2020) ‘Journal club using virtual breakout rooms: interactive continuing education with no learner preparation during COVID-19’, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 217–219. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000321


Castelli, F. R. & Sarvary, M. A. (2021) ‘Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so’, Ecology and Evolution, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 3565–3576. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7123


Chandler, K. (2016) ‘Using breakout rooms in synchronous online tutorials’, Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 16–23. doi: 10.14297/jpaap.v4i3.216


Chappell, K. & Craft, A. (2011) ‘Creative learning conversations: producing living dialogic spaces’, Educational Research, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 363–385. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2011.598663


Holmberg, J. (2016) ‘Applying a conceptual design framework to study teachers’ use of educational technology’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 2333–2349. doi: 10.1007/s10639-016-9536-3


Domakin, A. (2017) ‘Practice makes perfect: Designing Integrated Learning Experiences in Social Work Education using Laurillard’s ‘Conversational Framework’ for Learning’ The Journal of Practice Teaching & Learning, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 56–75. doi: 10.1921/jpts.v15i2.1077


Howe, C., et al., (2019) ‘Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: does it really impact on student outcomes?’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 28, no. 4–5, pp. 462–512. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730


Jayasundara, J. M. P. V. K., et al., (2022) ‘How UK HE STEM students were motivated to switch their cameras on: a study of the development of compassionate communications in task-focused online group meetings’, Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 317. doi: 10.3390/educsci12050317


Jones, P. & Hammond, J. (2016) ‘Talking to learn: dialogic teaching in conversation with educational linguistics’, Research Papers in Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2016.1106691


Jung, H. & Brady, C. (2020) ‘Maintaining rich dialogic interactions in the transition to synchronous online learning’, Information and Learning Sciences, vol. 121, no. 5/6, pp. 391–400. doi: 10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0096


Laurillard, D. (2012) Teaching as a Design Science Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology, Routledge, New York, NY.


Laurillard, D. (2013) Rethinking University Teaching a Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies, 2nd edn., Taylor and Francis, Hoboken.


Lim, J. and Richardson, J.C. (2016) ‘Exploring the effects of students’ social networking experience on social presence and perceptions of using SNSs for educational purposes’ The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 29, pp. 31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.001


Littleton, K. & Howe, C. (2010) Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction, Routledge, London.


Macdonald, J. & Campbell, A. (2012) ‘Demonstrating online teaching in the disciplines. A systematic approach to activity design for online synchronous tuition’, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 883–891. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01238.x


Mcgrath, L. & Wolstencroft, P. (2021) ‘I Want to Break Free’ How Online Breakout Rooms have Become a Modern Educational Curse,’ Chartered Association of Business Schools Blog, [online] Available at https://charteredabs.org/i-want-to-break-free-how-online-breakout-rooms-have-become-a-modern-educational-curse/


Mullen, G. E. & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (2006) ‘Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors’ demands and support in online and traditional classrooms’, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 257–266. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.005


Pask, G. (1976) Conversation theory: Applications in Education and Epistemology, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.


Pavlov, V., Smirnova, N. V. & Nuzhnaia, E. (2021) ‘Beyond the avatar: using video cameras to achieve effective collaboration in an online second language classroom’, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 228–243. doi: 10.53761/1.18.7.14


Powell, J. P. (1974) ‘Small group teaching methods in higher education’, Educational Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 163–171. doi: 10.1080/0013188740160301


Rucker, J., et al., (2020) ‘Utilizing zoom breakout rooms to expose preclerkship medical students to telemedicine encounters’, Medical Science Educator, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1359–1360. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01113-w


Rule, P. (2011) ‘Bakhtin and Freire: dialogue, dialectic and boundary learning’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 924–942. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00606.x


Saltz, J. & Heckman, R. (2020) ‘Using structured pair activities in a distributed online breakout room’, Online Learning, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 227–244. doi: 10.24059/olj.v24i1.1632


Sharmin, S. & Zhang, L. Y. (2022) ‘Experience report on the use of breakout rooms in a large online course’, Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, pp. 328–334. doi: 10.1145/3478431.3499328


Simpson, A. (2016) ‘Designing pedagogic strategies for dialogic learning in higher education’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 135–151. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2015.1038580


Skidmore, D. & Murakami, K. (eds) (2016) Dialogic Pedagogy: The Importance of Dialogue in Teaching and Learning, Multilingual Matters, Bristol.


Tomczak, J. & Bel, E. (2021) ‘A conversational framework for learning design (in adverse times)’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 22, pp 17. doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi22.705


Tonsmann, G. (2014) ‘A study of the effectiveness of blackboard collaborate for conducting synchronous courses at multiple locations’, InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, vol. 9, pp. 54–63. doi: 10.46504/09201404to


Tsihouridis, C., et al., (2021). ‘Learning to be Together Again!–Using Virtual Breakout Rooms to Fill the Communication and Cognitive Gap in Online Classrooms’, International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, vol. 389, pp. 370–381. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_38


Venton, B. J. & Pompano, R. R. (2021) Strategies for Enhancing Remote Student Engagement Through Active Learning.


Venton, B.J. and Pompano, R. R. (2021). ‘Strategies for enhancing remote student engagement through active learning’, Anal Bioanal Chem, vol. 413, pp. 1507–1512. doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03159-0


Von Der Heyden, B. P. (2019) ‘Interviews with professional geologists enhance learning about the applied aspects of economic geology for final-year university students’, Journal of Geoscience Education, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 20–33. doi: 10.1080/10899995.2018.1511959


Vygotsky, L. S. & Cole, M. (1978) Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.


Wegerif, R. (2008) ‘Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue’, British Educational Research Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 347–361. doi: 10.1080/01411920701532228
Published
2023-03-24
How to Cite
Douglas S. (2023). Achieving online dialogic learning using breakout rooms. Research in Learning Technology, 31. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.2882
Section
Original Research Articles