I do, I understand: engaging distance and campus students in sustainability through active learning

  • Sarah J. Wakes Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
  • Linda A. Dunn Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
Keywords: learning technologies, online, asynchronous learning, learning resources, distance teaching, sustainability

Abstract

Distance online learning connects students to education opportunities without having to be present at the institution offering the learning module. This case study involved development of a dual on-campus and distance course into a fully online course. It required a student-focused approach and an innovative application of learning technologies, additional resources and learning frameworks to encourage student engagement, independent learning and growth of critical-thinking skills. Changes to the design of the teaching approach and the use of technology improved the quality and quantity of interaction and communication between staff–students and students–students and facilitated a hands-on learning experience for online students interacting asynchronously. Student engagement with the course material, other students and teachers increased compared to previous years. Additional resource videos, learning and assessment guides (written and video), and online field trips helped develop critical-thinking skills and connectedness of learning to real-world applications. Recommendations are provided of learning approaches that could be used by other educators in different subject courses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


Agins, T. (2000) The End of Fashion: How Marketing Changed the Clothing Business Forever, Harper Collins Publishers Inc., New York.


Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K. & Natvig, D. (2007) ‘Strategies to engage students and reduce attrituin rates’, The Journal of Educators Online, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-09949-5


Annansingh, F. (2019) ‘Mind the gap: cognitive active learning in virtual learning environment perception of instructors and students’, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 3669–3688. doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-09949-5


Baran, E. & Correia, A. P. (2009) ‘Student-led facilitation strategies in online discussions’, Distance Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 339–361. doi: 10.1080/01587910903236510


Dai, Y. (2019) ‘Situating videoconferencing in a connected class toward intercultural knowledge development: a comparative reflection approach’, The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 41, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.001


DeLotell, P. J., Millam, L. A. & Reinhardt, M. M. (2010) ‘The use of deep learning strategies in online business courses to impact student retention’, American Journal of Business Education, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 49–55. doi: 10.19030/ajbe.v3i12.964


Devlin, M. & McKay, J. (2016) ‘Teaching students using technology: facilitating success for students from low socioeconomic status backgrounds in Australian universites’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 92–106. doi: 10.14742/ajet.2053


Diep, A. N., et al., (2019) ‘Adult learners’ needs in online and blended learning’, Australasian Journal of Adult Learning, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 223–253. doi: 10.3316/ielapa.592385127057281


Dixson, M. D. (2010) ‘Creating effective student engagement in online courses: what do students find engaging?’, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–13.


Garrison, D. R. (2003) ‘Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: the role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition’, Elements of Quality Online Education: Ptractie and Direction, vol. 4, no. pp. 47–58.


Greenland, S. J. & Moore, C. (2014) ‘Patterns of student enrolment and attrition in Australian open access online education: a preliminary case study’, Open Praxis, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 45–54. doi: 10.3316/informit.935906696497074


Hege, B. A. (2011) ‘The online theology classroom: strategies for engaging a community of distance learners in a hybrid model of online education’, Teaching Theology and Religion, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 13–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9647.2010.00668.x


James, A. (2006) ‘Critical moments in the production of ‘rigorous’ and ‘relevant’ cultural economic geographies’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 289–308. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph610oa


Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A. & Santiague, L. (2017) ‘Issues and challenges of teaching successful online courses in higher education: a literature review’, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 4–29. doi: 10.1177/0047239516661713


Knightley, W. M. (2007) ‘Adult learners online: students’ experiences of learning online’, Australian Journal of Adult Learning, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 264–288.


Kuiper, A., Solomonides, I. & Hardy, L. (2015) ‘Time on task in intensive modes of delivery’, Distance Education, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 231–245. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1055058


Laurillard, D. (2012) Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology, Routledge, New York.


Martin, F. & Bolliger, D. U. (2018) ‘Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment’, Online Learning Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 205–222. doi: 10.24059/olj.v22il.1092


Mimirinis, M. & Bhattacharya, M. (2007) ‘Design of virtual learning environments for deep learning’, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 55–64.


Nicol, D. (2008) Technology Supported Assessment [online]. Available at: https://www.reap.ac.uk/Portals/101/Documents/REAP/Technology_supported_assessment.pdf


Nicol, D. (2021) ‘Promoting dialogue in technology-enhanced learning’, in Early Careers in Education: Perspectives for Studentsa and NQT, eds A. Gillespie, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley. pp. 133–142.


Nieuwoudt, J. E. (2020) ‘Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors of academic success in online education’, Australasian Journal of Education Technology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 15–26. doi: 10.14742/ajet.5137


Nordmann, E., et al., (2020) ‘Ten simple rules for supporting a temporary online pivot in higher education’, PLOS Computing Biology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008242


Sheridan, K. & Kelly, M. A. (2010) ‘The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online courses’, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 767–779.


Stone, C. (2017) ‘Opportunity through online learning: improving student access, participation and success in higher education’, National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education [online], Available at: https://apo.org.au/node/94591


Stone, C. & Springer, M. (2019) ‘Interactivity, connectedness and “teacher-presence”: engaging and retaining students online’, Australian Journal of Adult Learning, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 146–169.


Tanis, C. J. (2020) ‘The seven principles of online learning: feedback from faculty and alumni on its importance for teaching and learning’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 28, https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/2319


Tyler, J. & Zurick, A. (2014) ‘Synchronous versus asynchronous learning: is there a measurable difference?’, Proceedings of the 2014 Institute for Behavioural and Applied Management Conference, Orlando, FL. pp. 52–54.


Vlachopoulos, P., Jan, S. K. & Lockyer, L. (2019) ‘A comparative study on the traditional and intensive delivery of an online course: design and facilitation recommendations’, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 27, no., pp. doi: 10.25304/rlt.v27.2196


Zilka, G. C., Cohen, R. & Rahimi, I. D. (2018) ‘Teacher presence and social presence in virtual and blended courses’, Journal of Information Technology Teaching: Research, vol. 17, pp. 103–126. doi: 10.28945/4061
Published
2023-01-12
How to Cite
Wakes S. J., & Dunn L. A. (2023). I do, I understand: engaging distance and campus students in sustainability through active learning. Research in Learning Technology, 31. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.2823
Section
Original Research Articles